Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Paulish
Page: 1 2 next>>
Dec 11, 2011 21:57:17   #
Roger Hicks wrote:
DennisK wrote:
Ok,I guess I should have added a little more here....I actually meant if you send your pics out to be printed;i.e Wal-mart.Are most labs capable to print .TIFF?


Dunno, sorry. Any good lab should be able to. Personally I'd not trust Wal-Mart to find their posterior anatomy with both hands, unless I knew and trusted their staff.

Cheers,

R.


Walmart allows you to upload pictures setup for their printer's profile. If you're finicky, that can be an important consideration indeed!
Go to
Dec 11, 2011 15:00:57   #
You wouldn't.
Go to
Dec 11, 2011 06:19:35   #
ltruex wrote:
lindysuewho wrote:
Just curious as to your reasons for doing so.


Shooting JPEG and lets say you use your camera to open and show images to friends...everytime you close the image...it distorts with pixels, and do it enough times it will damage your captured image. Note has never happened to me, but the class of study I was attending gave that reason not to shoot only in JPEG as from the obvious you want your data as stated earlier. L3


No, that will only happen if you *edit* and then save the image. Then yes, there wil be a lossy jpeg re-compression. But just displaying the image in your camera's viewfinder or screen will have no effect on the stored image.
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 16:40:26   #
Pentax definitely makes some great cameras. A friend of mine, noted for his wilderness photography, has one of their 40-mxp medium format models. It's only serious drawback, I think, is that he probably has to hire Sherpas to lug it for him on his numerous mountain treks.
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 16:30:45   #
ole sarg wrote:
I would urge you to get the T3i and learn and grow with it. The Lumix does not have the versatility of a DSLR. It is a glorified point and shoot, and a mirrorless viewfinder does not give one the intimacy of a mirror view finder. It is like looking at things via a tv camera rather than in person. also, lens selection is limited w/lumix


I must disagree vehemently with your comments relating to lack of versatility and "glorifired point and shoot"- nature of the G3. As far as your view, as it were, on the viewfinder is concerned, I've already pointed out the one significant flaw in an all Live View system. You're feelings about lack of "intimacy" may be perfectly valid *for you*, but it boils down to a matter of taste. In practical terms of perfectly previewing an image to be captured, the Lumix' viewfinder does the job flawlessly.

The G3 uses Panasonic's own range of lenses as well as the Olympus line without the need for an adaptor. That makes the camera sufficiently versatile for serious photographers in the interchangeable lens arena.

The G3 focuses *more* quickly, and at least as accurately, as it's DSLR competition. It's 4/3 sensor results in less noisy shots than those snapped by DSLR's which, in that format/price-range, have smaller sensors. The G3 offers the same array of convenient professional features offered by full sized DSLR's. It has no in-camera HDR, but its exceptionally flexible bracketing capabilities make software HDR a breeze.

There is one minor caveat relating to bracketing though. The self timer does not work with the multishot modes. If you want to bracket, you must hold your finger on the shutter button until the sequence is completed. This, of course, admits the possibility of user-introduced vibration. If, however, multishot work is essential to you, the issue can be remedied via the purchase of a remote, available from Panosonic.

Your highly critical remarks were not backed up by examples of specific deficiencies.

My suggestion is that serious shoppers disregard the possibly prejudiced opinions of both of us and read the readily available reviews in the media, talk to owners of both kinds of camera, and get some hands-on experience, if possible, in a camera store.
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 15:53:03   #
snowbear wrote:
Paulish wrote:
Focus manually?

Not necessarily; if set to continuous (multipoint) mode, the AF can get confused as to what to focus on, especially when the background is close to the subject or overly bright. Switching to single-point mode reduces the number of things the AF can see.


Good point (so to speak).
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 06:56:26   #
Focus manually?
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 06:53:00   #
In that price range right now, I'm very partial to the Panasonic Lumix DMC G3. As a mirrorless 4/3 format camera, it's much more compact than the DSLR'S you're considering yet outshines them in almost every respect. The one notable exception though, is that it's not the best choice if your main application will be high speed sports video. Its viewfinder is live view, not optical; so the viewfinder image may lag behind the action.
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 06:37:34   #
Have you tried using flash with slow shutter sync? Some cameras have settings for night scenes or "illuminations." Have you tried that?
Go to
Dec 3, 2011 00:35:31   #
Yeah, and the cows are good looking too!
Go to
Dec 2, 2011 18:38:51   #
You're welcome--and thanks for sharing your appreciation. It's always rewarding to know you were helpful.
Go to
Dec 2, 2011 18:34:52   #
Just a tip for you all. If you want to sports, be sure to get a camera with an optical viewfinder, not just "live view."
Go to
Dec 1, 2011 07:26:42   #
Best of luck.
Go to
Dec 1, 2011 07:22:50   #
I prefer something a little on the lighter side, but that's just me.
Go to
Dec 1, 2011 06:54:10   #
Of you like cows, you'll probably enjoy these videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXKDu6cdXLI&feature=youtube_gdata_player

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NA-ST8nXl4U&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.