In my opinion, the photograph seems to be "cluttered" or stated another way what is the point? There seems to be some points within the picture that could be made by cropping.

Next, I believe it world have been a better photograph if there was a greater DOF. It seems the "dogs" on the back of the shirt is not in very good focus.

I like the B&W approach.

I wonder what event made people think these laws needed to be enacted??

That is very good one.

I have recently started taking pictures of BIF.

For the learning process and in order to get some photographs, I went to a target rich environment -- The Sonoran Desert Museum.

I appreciate all comments.

You comments will part of the information I need to overcome my photography learning curve.


Thank you.

BIF 2

(Download)

I have recently started taking pictures of BIF.

For the learning process and in order to get some photographs, I went to a target rich environment -- The Sonoran Desert Museum.

I appreciate all comments.

You comments will part of the information I need to overcome my photography learning curve.


Thank you.

BIF 1

(Download)

I want to thank everyone for their comments.

Given all the comments about the rule changes relative to one last photo being posted, I think I my be OK in posting my final -- if not it will be dumped. So here is hoping I am not violating any current rule(s) for this site.

I have modified the original photo and removed the distracting objects (people, cans?, etc) and removed some of white building on the left side.

I believe I need to let it go or I could end up in an "analyze paralysis" situation and never get another photo taken.

(Download)

Thank you for your comments -- I appreciate all of them. You provide me with part of the information I need to overcome my photography learning curve.

Thank you for your comments -- I appreciate all of them. You provide me with part of the information I need to overcome my photography learning curve.

I would like your analysis, critique and ranking on and of these 3 photos.

Thank you for your time and effort.

(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Correction

I would like to receive feedback on the photo & thank whoever remove the light one.
Sorry I screwed up.

I would like to receive you option(s) on each of the attached photos and your comparision opinion

(Download)

Thank you for sharing -- they are very nice

This Tread reminds me of two items from my past.

First, When I was first starting my military carrier, an old Colonel told me "If someone says something you do not agree with and you do not say anything -- then it is assumed you agree” and,

Second, is a famous statement and provocative poem attributed to pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the cowardice of German intellectuals following the Nazis' rise to power and the subsequent purging of their chosen targets, group after group. There is some disagreement over the exact wording of the quotation and when it was created; the content of the quotation may have been presented differently by Niemöller on different occasions.

“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.”

The above forces me to provide the following for your consideration:

I am concerned about the minimal amount of information that supports the one-sided rants that verge one hate propaganda. The majority of the rants appear to be based on varying degrees of hate, stupidity and misinformation with the intent to be divisive.

It does not matter what group of individuals you select; there is typically a good spread of the good, bad, and ugly individuals in each group, please don’t let the bad individuals define the group.

I like the crop. Have you tried to adjust for more detail in the white area?

It is a good shot.

Thanks for posting.

nice