InfiniteISO wrote:
Being found liable is not being convicted. You really are dense. The jury that sided with Carroll would have found him liable of anything if they could hurt him financially. You can sing the praises of that kangaroo court, but is that the kind of country you want to live in?
Ask yourself this. If Bill Clinton was charged with the same "evidence", after the same amount of time had elapsed, in the same jurisdiction, would he have been found liable? No, of course not.
I still trust the trail system more than tribal/political nonsense.