Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Posts for: Mondolinni
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 next>>
Mar 10, 2015 13:04:22   #
Now That's Awesome!! :D
Go to
Feb 19, 2015 09:23:44   #
EXCELLENT MY MAN.
Swede wrote:
A little old lady explains the “Green Thing”

Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the much older lady that she should bring her own grocery bags, because plastic bags are not good for the environment.
The woman apologized to the young girl and explained, "We didn't have this 'green thing' back in my earlier days."

The young clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment for future generations."

The older lady said that she was right -- our generation didn't have the "green thing" in its day. The older lady went on to explain:
Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were recycled. But we didn't have the "green thing" back in our day.

Grocery stores bagged our groceries in brown paper bags that we reused for numerous things. Most memorable besides household garbage bags was the use of brown paper bags as book covers for our school books. This was to ensure that public property (the books provided for our use by the school) was not defaced by our scribblings. Then we were able to personalize our books on the brown paper bags. But, too bad we didn't do the "green thing" back then.
We walked up stairs because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks.

But she was right. We didn't have the "green thing" in our day.

Back then we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throw away kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy-gobbling machine burning up 220 volts. Wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing.

But that young lady is right; we didn't have the "green thing" back in our day.
Back then we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana. In the kitchen we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity.

But she's right; we didn't have the "green thing" back then.

We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blade in a r azor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull.

But we didn't have the "green thing" back then.

Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service in the family's $45,000 SUV or van, which cost what a whole house did before the "green thing." We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 23,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest burger joint
.
But isn't it sad the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn't have the "green thing" back then?
:|

Sad but OH so very true
Swede
A little old lady explains the “Green Thing” br b... (show quote)
Go to
Jan 15, 2015 15:10:58   #
imagemeister wrote:
Since none of my longer lenses have IS/OS/VC, and since I regularly shoot at 600mm, I have been on a quest for maximum stabilisation techniques for some time now. Having adequate support for the lens/camera is a big part of the equation. But beyond that, there are still other things you could/should do. On longer lenses, having a firm grip towards the front of the lens works well for me. Pushing the camera against your face at the moment of exposure is another sharpness technique with high merits from my experience.
So, my first thought was to install an extended eyepice on my Canon's - and that was better. Then I thought, I really need broader contact areas for even better stabilisation properties and comfort. I searched the net and found nothing of what I was looking for. So, I decided to make it. I went to Ace and got a "T brace" that had some holes already drilled in it and bent the "T" part at 90 degree angle in a vice and installed a piece of self stick insulating foam to the "T" part. I then ordered off ebay some metal feet that fit in the accessory shoe on the top of the camera with a 1/4-20 stud - for the forehead brace. the bottom chin brace is held by a screw in the tripod socket. This results in exceptional stability and comfort ! - and makes me wonder why I have never seen this or thought of it before in my 40 + years in photography ! See below........
I now consider this hardware/technique to be indispensable in obtaining maximum sharpness at 300-600mm focal lengths. You will also find this keeps sweat from getting into your navigation wheels and other switches on the back of your camera. It also affords you a little more room to use BBF if you are left eyed like me.
If anyone knows of the commercial availability of similar hardware, please let us know !
Since none of my longer lenses have IS/OS/VC, and ... (show quote)


Very well done Imagemeister !
Go to
Jan 15, 2015 08:44:19   #
lazyjt1 wrote:
Here you go

http://photolisticlife.com/2012/11/12/convert-the-d600-viewfinder-into-a-round-viewfinder-works-with-d5100-d7000-and-others/

Works on D7100


Great article, thanks for the info!
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 17:22:26   #
RWR wrote:
Would this do it? $4.25 isn't bad.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/407314-REG/Nikon_25335.html


Thanks RWR, no , that isn't bad!
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 17:21:10   #
boberic wrote:
As long as we are talking about a vello eye cup, you can take a look at the vello clear glass LCD screen protector. It works to protect the screen from scratches. and from damage from exceessive cleaning


Sounds Good! Thanks!!
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 16:07:09   #
RWR wrote:
You don't need to apologize to anyone. The way it works here is that if anyone doesn't like a particular thread, they are free to move on and ignore it. After you're here awhile, you will make up your own mind as to which ones you'll ignore. Welcome to the forum! The majority here do try to help.


Thanks RWR, I got that sense of help from the start, I just got confused as to who I was answering. Much Appreciated.
Go to
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Jan 14, 2015 16:03:08   #
redhogbill wrote:
hello mondolinni, if you click on "quote reply" you will be conversing with "that" person , plus it makes it easier to understand to whom you are talking to,
good luck and welcome to the HOG!

btw {by the way} this is YOUR thread,


Thank You Redhogbill, I appreciate the education, I will know better now.
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 15:45:26   #
End of Thread...
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 15:43:44   #
Geez, I didn't think I was going "on & on", I already ordered the Vello per your suggestion, I was just explaining to the gentleman what I saw on the Nikon site at his request. Sorry! :(
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 15:06:31   #
From what I see on the Nikon site, I guess the FX models have round viewfinders as opposed to the DX rectangle. The only one Nikon sells are compatible with the round viewfinder.
Go to
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Jan 14, 2015 13:52:56   #
Thanks Guys,
I guess there isn't much call for it or Nikon would have it available for DX formats as well as FX.
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 11:22:52   #
Hello Folks,
Does anyone have any suggestions for a "good" eye cup for D7100 ?
From what I see on Nikons website, they only have one for the FX models.
Could use something to keep my big nose off the LCD screen.
Thanks.
Frank
Go to
Jan 13, 2015 08:40:03   #
"I Pledge Allegiance"
Beautiful...Thanks for sharing.
Go to
Jan 9, 2015 11:40:29   #
Thanks Much!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 next>>
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.