Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: cbtsam
Page: <<prev 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 next>>
Dec 5, 2014 17:32:38   #
donnahde wrote:
Does anyone have a recommendation for a lab you've used for this size print - 30x40? I've never done one this big and it's for a client. Thanks!


I've been verrrry happy with Full Circle in Baltimore. I used them in the old days with Cibachrome & Ilfochrome, and I've also used them since that stuff went the way of the dinosaurs.
Go to
Nov 24, 2014 14:34:47   #
bsprague wrote:
Everything I've read says there is no loss of picture quality or necessary info. However, you can always find a debate!

http://www.mosaicarchive.com/2013/05/01/the-raw-truth-about-dng/



Thanks. Another LAW OF NATURE to add to my collection, such as 'In a gravity field, matter expands to fill the available horizontal space.'
Go to
Nov 23, 2014 22:33:44   #
bsprague wrote:
You can ignore all the Nikon software and converting to TIFFs. You can continue working in your favorite software. You can keep your money in your pocket.

Adobe supplies DNG Converter for free and keeps it current. DNG Converter 8.7 for your MAC is here: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5854

It quickly batch converts the raw files from your camera to raw files that end in .DNG which are fully functional raw files for use in whatever work flow you have.


So the DNG Converter works, but I just noticed that the DNG files are approximately 25% smaller than the NEF files (e.g., one DNG is 35.2 MB, while the corresponding NEF is 43.2 MB).

Does this compression - if that's what it is - mean I've compromised or lost some of the info in the NEF? If so, what sort of info?

(BTW, I elected not to embed the NEF in the DNG - otherwise the DNG is bigger than the NEF. Nor did I elect "Lossy Compression" or "Embed Fast Load Data." For compatibility, I elected "Camera Raw 6.6 and later," so my Photoshop 5.1 could read it.)
Go to
Nov 22, 2014 15:17:31   #
bsprague wrote:
Look again!!!! (Copy attached)

If you've not looked at it before it can be confusing. Each camera as the first release where it is covered. The D810 is 8.6 and later. The D750 is newer, so it is 8.7 and later. But, there won't be a "later" for a few months. It's a moving target as cameras are introduced.


So I just clicked on bsprague's link - http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5854 - which got me this:

"Support for the following cameras has been added. Visit the Camera Raw page for a complete list of supported cameras.


Canon

Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Casio

Casio EX-100PRO

Fujifilm

Fujifilm X30

Fujifilm X100T

Fujifilm X-T1 Graphite Silver

Leaf

Leaf Credo 50

Leica

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109)

Leica M-P

Leica V-Lux (Typ 114)

Leica X (Typ 113)

Nikon

Nikon D750

Olympus

Olympus PEN E-PL7

Olympus STYLUS 1s"


Which is the source of my "Ooops."

HOWEVER, I have downloaded the DNG Converter, and it seems to work smooth as silk.

Thanks to all who have helped.
Go to
Nov 22, 2014 11:11:33   #
bsprague wrote:
You can ignore all the Nikon software and converting to TIFFs. You can continue working in your favorite software. You can keep your money in your pocket.

Adobe supplies DNG Converter for free and keeps it current. DNG Converter 8.7 for your MAC is here: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5854

It quickly batch converts the raw files from your camera to raw files that end in .DNG which are fully functional raw files for use in whatever work flow you have.


Ooops! Just checked your reference for the DNG Converter page, and it lists the D750 but not the D810. Is that because the 750 came later than the 810, so that the 810 is old news?
Go to
Nov 22, 2014 11:05:55   #
bsprague wrote:
You can ignore all the Nikon software and converting to TIFFs. You can continue working in your favorite software. You can keep your money in your pocket.

Adobe supplies DNG Converter for free and keeps it current. DNG Converter 8.7 for your MAC is here: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5854

It quickly batch converts the raw files from your camera to raw files that end in .DNG which are fully functional raw files for use in whatever work flow you have.


Thank UUU! That looks like a VERRRY good solution.
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 19:07:47   #
JD750 wrote:
You can use ViewNX to download the NEF files then save them in TIFFANY format for import to your other software.

Capture NX-D is the replacement for Capture NX2 Nikons excellent photo editing software that was written by Nik but no longer available after Google bought Nik. NX-D is a work in process and it does not include a transfer program. Picture control is a utility for manipulating pic control settings on NEF files.you only need ViewNX For what you want.


Clear & concise! Thank you so much
Go to
Nov 21, 2014 16:49:17   #
Just bought a Nikon D810, so I now have three new pieces of software: 1) ViewNX2, 2) Capture NX-D, and 3) Picture Control Utility 2, and about 150 pages of manuals to slog through.

I have been using Photoshop CS5.1 & Bridge CS5.1 with great satisfaction on my iMac, but I know this won't open the D810 NEF Raw files. [I am resisting the new Photoshop at $1,200.00 (or more) per decade.] I also have Lightroom 3, but haven't really gotten into it. It all worked so well with my D300 I could dance a jig for joy.

So, I could use some help figuring out what these new pieces of software 1) thru 3) are good for. My inclination is to just use View (or Capture?) to convert the NEF files to TIFFs, and push these through Photoshop 5.1's Raw Converter and other tools, but I think its clear that I don't really know what to do, so I'm seeking all the help I can get.

Thanks in advance to all you helpful hogs who try to come to my rescue.
Go to
Nov 19, 2014 10:11:06   #
I see B&H is offering significant savings on various lenses if I buy a camera. For example, if I buy a D810, I get $400 off on a 70-200mm f/4 lens.

Does anyone know if this is a routine seasonal sale? If the sale is likely to get better as Xmas gets closer? If it is just B&H, or if it is a Nikon offer available at other retailers?
Go to
Oct 23, 2014 22:30:44   #
Walterdad wrote:
When ever I find myself in Manhattan, I try to carve out a little time and hit the galleries to see what's happening. This summer and early fall, I hit the Gary Winogrand show at the Met, The Survey of Latin American Photography 1944-1913 at ICP and the Steven Shore show over in Chelsea.
After the initial delight of seeing prints of classic Winogrand street shots ( full frame and no cropping here) I found myself dragging a bit as one room unfolded into the next. Probably more to do with museum fatigue on my part, rather than Winogrand. As exiting and reading some of the wall texts it became apparent that almost full 25% of the images were posthumously selected from either undeveloped film or negatives. Other than the interest this might have for a
Winogrand scholar, One has to wonder if this is a good idea ?
I could see a case for either way.
The Latin American Survey with the exception of Alberto Korda, was chock full of photographers I had no idea existed. For obvious reasons having to do with the history of the region, the political subjects were particularly powerful. Most, but certainly not all of political subject matter you see shot from here is light weight by comparison. A number of shots had a factual reality that comes from the photographer literally taking his life in own hands without the distanced look of some photo journalism.
Steven Shore, color photo pioneer, despite his established reputation was a breath of fresh air as well. After having gone from one gallery to the next, featuring epic scaled photographic prints with seemingly interchangeable authorship, here was work that didn't rely on the "hey wow factor"of giant prints. The still life shots done in the Ukraine had the hallmark characteristics
that Shore has developed and has been emulated so much by other contemporary photographers. That is the look of the mundane and anonymous that on a quick, lazy or uninformed first glance has the sort of passive presence that seems to have the all the intention of a snap shot. Hardly the case - All the pictorial considerations one would expect are there - just understated and subtle.
Wondering if any one else has seen any of this work and what their impressions were ?
When ever I find myself in Manhattan, I try to car... (show quote)



Well, I saw the Winogrand show. I understand what you mean by museum fatigue; it started to hit me, and I thought about quitting early, but the more I got into the exhibit, the more impressed I became with the work, and I became energized by the experience. Much of it was familiar, of course, but not all of it.
Go to
Oct 5, 2014 13:16:52   #
Rongnongno wrote:
I have one. I never turn it on when I am by myself and when my wife is here it still mostly off... Ah, no cable no antenna, all BS coming out of those anyway... :hunf:

So too much time on my hands! :shock:

What is your cure then? :lol: :lol: :lol:




My cure: take the time outta yer hands, put yer camera in, and take more photographs. :mrgreen:
Go to
Aug 12, 2014 09:00:09   #
Using Adobe Bridge, I routinely create a duplicate of the image & import the copy into Camera Raw.
Go to
Aug 9, 2014 10:43:21   #
Lanny wrote:
I have hiked several of the trails in and around Yosemite over the years, including to the top of Half Dome. For a two day trip, I would consider taking a tram up to the top of Glacier Point and hiking the 8 mile trail down by Nevada Falls and Vernal Falls into the valley floor and perhaps the 4 mile hike up to the top of Yosemite Falls. I understand that you have to have a permit to go to the top of Half Dome now and if you do that, it is a long day's hike up and back. Here are some pictures from my last trip, all of which were taken only from the valley floor. Unfortunately it was late in the year and the falls were not running full like they usually do in the Spring. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lannypartain/sets/72157627699703876/
I have hiked several of the trails in and around Y... (show quote)


Wow, that sunrise @ tunnel view is very nice indeed!
Go to
Aug 8, 2014 10:09:23   #
Almost half a century ago, a friend introduced me to extension tubes. I got a set of K tubes for my 85mm 1.8 lens & Nikon F, and my pictures have never been the same. I don't always shoot closeup or macro, but the experience really changed how I look for images to make.
Go to
Aug 8, 2014 10:07:21   #
Almost half a century ago, a friend introduced me to extension tubes. I bought a set of K tubes for my Nikon F, put my 85mm 1.8 lens on it, and my photography has never been the same.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.