Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: sb
Page: <<prev 1 ... 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 ... 1174 next>>
Feb 20, 2016 07:27:11   #
firtree wrote:
I have a couple of shots (both terrible) but you can get an idea of male vs female. The female is wearing her green eye shadow.


Thanks! Probably one of the few bird species where the female is arguably prettier than the male!
Go to
Feb 20, 2016 07:24:42   #
Sadly some real studies are just as bad. A few years back there was a major study of some new (very expensive) genetically engineered drug - from which the FDA based their decision to approve the drug. The study was funded by Genentech. And you know everyone involved was loaded down with stock options for Genentech, whose stock was bound to shoot up when this drug was approved. Bias in science - nah, never....
Go to
Feb 17, 2016 14:18:42   #
angler wrote:
Nice shot Sb.


Thanks, Angler.
Go to
Feb 17, 2016 14:18:26   #
Cwilson341 wrote:
Steve, I think I understand better now. What I quoted earlier is what is in both of my hard copy guides. However, they also say the male is darker, mostly black and the female more brown. I googled Anhinga and found a site that mentioned that the female also develops the enhanced eye color during mating season. It did not mention the head feathers but the feathers on this particular bird are not nearly as prominent as some I have seen so I am guessing the female also develops that characteristic but to a lesser extent. The guides are great but they don't cover every detail. Also, the color of a bird may appear different in different light.

This shot is an exceptional capture no matter what!!
Steve, I think I understand better now. What I qu... (show quote)


Yes - the more I read the more unclear it is to me! I am still not sure. I am paying more attention to the anhingas and some are indeed very dark all over. Only a few seem to have the blue/green skin around the eye. Waiting for a new bird guide that I ordered - probably won't clear things up.
Go to
Feb 17, 2016 14:13:19   #
ebbote wrote:
Very good series Steve.


Thanks, Earnest!
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 16:37:30   #
docshark wrote:
Wow Steve that would have been quite a series if you had arrived a little earlier. Maybe not one you would have wanted to post though!
-Doc


We see lots of gators and have always wondered why we don't see them eating - I imagine they do a lot of their eating early in the morning. It would have been interesting to see! Normally we watch them as they lie there motionless for hours it seems - it seems they are just waiting for some hapless bird to let down its' guard and get just a little TOO close in front of them - and pow! If I had more patients I would go and sit there for hours... but I am not that patient.
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 16:32:17   #
docshark wrote:
This is a wonderful series Steve. Very sharp and well composed. -Doc


Thanks, Doc!
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 16:32:02   #
orrie smith wrote:
nice shoot


Thanks, Orrie!
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 16:31:49   #
Cwilson341 wrote:
Great series with a pleasing assortment of birds! Things are looking up!


Thanks, Carol!
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 09:06:15   #
Violameister wrote:
Beautiful series. Thanks.


Thanks, Viola.
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 09:05:50   #
firtree wrote:
Actually this is a super shot of a female. The males are black all over, females have the brown neck and throat.


OK - thanks. I am going to have to look this up - or at least order a more detailed field guide!
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 08:51:40   #
Really nice set! Here in the 'states we would call that duck a "Donald Trump Duck"!
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 08:49:19   #
jerryc41 wrote:
The last thing we need is women politicians making laws about men's reproductive rights! Next thing you know, men will be passing laws about what women can do with their bodies. ;-)


That would never happen! :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 08:48:51   #
Chaostrain wrote:
So you're saying that since one person is wronged it's okay for another person to be wronged? Why not fix the original wrong instead?


Because the legislature is heavily weighted with good-ole' boys who don't seem to think it an intrusion for the government to force a woman to have a vaginal probe ultrasound. All "small-government republicans" I am sure. She knows there is no chance of her bill succeeding or of changing the ultrasound bill, but she wants to make these folks THINK about what they are doing.
Go to
Feb 16, 2016 08:40:12   #
DavidPhares wrote:
What are you, the "Topic Police?"


Yes, and he has the badge to prove it! :) Lighten up, all!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 ... 1174 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.