I respectfully disagree. The water is blown out (overexposed) and the shutter speed is too slow to render the rocks in sharp focus. I say this constructively with no meaness intended. Not clear if you used a tripod, but at f10, the rocks etc should be tack sharp which is almost impossible to achieve at 1/8 sec handheld. When I shoot moving water, I experiment with various shutter speeds and keep a close eye on the histogram and chimp to see how well focused the image. It can take multiple (many sometimes) to achieve a pleasing pic.

Added comment - you mentioned blurry leaves due to wind. Wind is something that is not in your control obviously, so you need to understand the limits of what you can do compared to what you want to do. If it’s windy and the leaves are moving, but you want them sharp, your SS is determined by the leaf movement, not how silky you want the water to look. If the leaves are dancing too much and you want them in sharp focus, your necessary ss might be too high to blur the water much at all, if any. In nature, there is a limit to the number of variables you can control. I can envision a scene where nicely rendered flowing water (“nicely” being a subjective adverb) with slightly blurred leaves to suggest the breeze and razor sharp rocks might be quite effective. In your situation, I think the evaluation of your photo has much less to do with the amount of blur in the water which is highly subjective and far more to do with the exposure value of the water (blown out in my opinion) and the sharpness of the items that are NOT moving (the rocks). Again - you asked for a critique and I offer mine in the spirit of trying to be constructive and helpful.

Fran, I really like the image, particularly the composition and colors. As far as the blurring is concerned, that's a personal decision. Photographers have a lot of opinions on how much blurring and how much exposure.

What I would suggest you try in the future is to trade off low ISO settings for higher F-stops. ISO manifests itself as noise while F-stop increases sharpness and depth of field. With a higher F-stop, I'd move the ISO high enough to get your shutter speeds faster than 1/100 sec or even faster. With shutter speed that fast, movement due to wind or camera motion due to hand holding is much diminished.

And after saying all that, I'm reminded that everyone has a great idea that won't work. This may be one of mine. Only way to find out is to try it. Nice job