geolaval wrote:
These don't seem like your standard house boat. Thanks for posting
All are pretty well permanent in location
bcheary wrote:
Good shot. :thumbup: :thumbup: I prefer to see water like you have photographed it rather than those milky artistic flows. :-D
So you don't like shaving cream pictures - this kind of photo just needs enough to denote the motion - in my estimation. This one was a relatively fast shutter speed due to the extreme turbulence in the water and I wanted to stop the run off on the rocks.
Done with light painting and no post processing
Thought I would give it a shot - long way to go yet before I can say I'm any good.
This was taken at a predator bird show where trainers were in control of the birds
Captured in British Columbia at a focal length of 220 mm
turtlepond wrote:
Here are two shots that I took of the heard. The second one shows the moon but no elk. It was taken at 1/600. both shots were on a tripod. I left everything the same. f4, iso400 only changed speed. The first photo was 2 sec. Thank you for your imput. I need to keep learning. UHH is a great place with wonderful people with great ideas.
digital pictures don't cost much.
There is no better way of learning than to put your mode into manual andplay with the settings. Don't be afraid to use a high iso, most modern cameras let you go really high, I can go to 12,500 if i needed to but generates too much noise, With 1600 being near noise free and 3200 generally being acceptable
dependant on my aperature setting and focal length
practice, practice, practice,
A beautiful place about 30 kilometers east of Chiliwack BC
Ruthiel wrote:
That's a huge waterfall and the trees in the foreground really give it perspective.
There is another couple hundred feet above what you see, ts highest point is 384 metres (1,260 ft) from its base,
Takakkaw Falls in Yoho National Park, British Columbia