gessman wrote:
There's one other thing I failed to mention. I did a lot of work with the census a few years back, doing demographic research work for my own edification. One thing I did, not for personal use but in researching for a piece I was writing, was to count, zipcode by zipcode, the number of men and women at various age levels to see how badly women outnumber men since so many women were complaining that there weren't enough men to go around. I don't mean I literally "counted them." I can do a little database programming so it was quick and painless for me and very efficient.
I don't mean this to be discouraging on your birthday but, what I found was, from 18 to 55, through the most likely courting years, men outnumber women in our society. That draws to a near tie at 65. Then and only then do women start to outnumber men on up to the end. Need I point out that most of the women who constitute the numerical advantage we hear about are in some kind of institutional living arrangement which also speaks to many other issues such as political power, etc. My database I created could be manipulated to show which zipcode, in descending order, all 43,043 of them, where a woman could go to find the most favorable zipcode where the ratio of men to women was the greatest without respect to the issue of how many were actually available, read that "married" which seems to be less of an issue now. I did the analysis in 1993 comparing the '80 and '90 census. That said, we don't change as much as we might think or as fast. My analysis would still be good today in 95% of the instances. It also worked the other way around for men too but a person has to be capable of "getting there" where the odds are most fertile. That's not always the easy part. I was also analyzing for several other reasons and that was just a little part of what I was doing but nonetheless, very interesting.
By the way, I sure like your work with the old house. That ol' demon rum. Looks like someone enjoy themselves "'til their house fell down around them." I've been hearing that all my life but that's the first time I've seen enough evidence to justify the saying, albeit circumstantial.
There's one other thing I failed to mention. I di... (
show quote)
:-D :-D Ya know, I think you and I would be great friends if we live close enough, I like your wry style and the information you just gave me is great albeit I do not know exactly why my perseption is that women outnumber men in my demographic, I'll just have to take your word for it.
As for mating habits, well, I never said women in their 50's were all bad and/or ugly, only that it came as a rude awakening to me; there has to be some chemestry there because I would rather be alone than tied to a warm body that I can't bear to be around, it wouldn't be fair to either of us. Perhaps it will be just me and my camera for the rest of my life, I do have family; perhaps that will have to do socially for me, but alas, only time will tell but I do love the company of attractive women (for their age and in my age range) who have level and intellegent heads on their shoulders.