Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: imagemeister
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1972 next>>
Apr 21, 2024 13:51:36   #
BAchme wrote:
I am trying to explore my options for flowers, so I tried Home Depot. It was a very sunny day with some wind. I went inside, and it was slightly better, but sometimes they were crammed together!

I wasn't satisfied with the last flower post, so I thought I would try again! I went to two other places, so all I can do is keep practicing!

I hope you enjoy this journey and process! Still, see soft focus sometimes!

Being a work in progress isn't always fun!

Feedback is welcomed!
I am trying to explore my options for flowers, so ... (show quote)


Well, you are doing quite well ! IMO, the biggest concern with florals is DOF control and back round rendering .....I mostly go to Lowes for my florals. Soft focus is GOOD - when it is in the right place 8-)
Go to
Apr 21, 2024 13:17:18   #
btbg wrote:
Whether noise is a problem or not is subjective. Get rid of the noise and you probably hurt sharpening. In my job noise is a non issue as newsprint does not show noise. For your use it may be more important to get rid of noise.


Yes, attacking noise in post will always hurt sharpness - even the best noise abatement software ! So, the best idea is to control noise in the camera !

Yes, newsprint is very forgiving in showing fine details of any kind - including noise......
.
Go to
Apr 21, 2024 11:00:58   #
btbg wrote:
I decided to post these images because of recent discussions about whether or not people should use 2x extenders. I know these are birds, but putting them in the bird subsection will prevent the converter discussion.
The photos are taken with a Nikon 400f2.8s lens. The built in 1.4 converter is being used and coupled with a 2x converter. The wren also has a 5mm extension tube for closer focus.
So, the question is are these photos sharp enough, or should people not use the converters and attempt to gain the extra reach by cropping. I believe that any loss of image quality from using the converter is more than offset by the additional reach and the ability to come closer to filling the frame, but I thought it would be interesting to see where any discussion would go. Those of you who believe that no one should use teleconverters, go ahead and have your say. The photos will be posted in the first reply.
I decided to post these images because of recent d... (show quote)


Noise is really hurting your examples here .....always a concerning by-product of converter light loss ....
Go to
Apr 21, 2024 10:11:23   #
NICE work ! .....thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 21, 2024 10:07:31   #
billnikon wrote:
First, you posted in the wrong section.
Second, no teleconverter ever produced improves image sharpness.
Third, combining teleconverter's really makes sharpness suffer, as seen in your images.
Forth, I use a 600mm f4 without any converter on a full frame mirrorless camera that I use for my wildlife photography.
Fifth, I never use teleconverter's because of the reasons I have given.
Sixth, Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.


LOL
Go to
Apr 21, 2024 10:04:49   #
It mostly depends on the quality of the lens and the f-stop speed of the lens and the ISO performance of the camera you are using. The other part is the light level you are using them with and the pixel density of the sensor.

Lower light levels and higher pixel densities favor cropping with AI pixel enlargement. And then, there is the loss of AF speed with converter .....also favoring cropping

Yes, I have used the Canon 2XII with the 300 2.8 and the 2X III with the 400 f4 DO.....

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-795438-1.html
.
Go to
Apr 20, 2024 19:01:01   #
NICE - very Lovely Quail ! ......thanks for sharing !
Go to
Apr 20, 2024 14:43:19   #
Patsworld wrote:
I printed a pelican on metal. It is so beautiful. The only down side is that it’s very reflective so you wouldn’t want to hang it by a window or light source.


Yes, a serious consideration !
Go to
Apr 20, 2024 14:32:37   #
Gorgeous shots of this gorgeous hawk ! ......thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 20, 2024 14:28:30   #
Out looking for Eagles and this guy jumped up on the boardwalk behind me ! 8-) ......NO eagles 8-(

Sony RX10m4, 450mm equiv. , f4, 1/200, ISO 100, hand held early morning direct sun .....best in DL !

Thanks to ALL for stopping by and comment ! .....Larry
.


(Download)
Go to
Apr 20, 2024 12:09:13   #
A cutie ! Love otters - always very challenging !
Go to
Apr 20, 2024 12:01:28   #
very NICE ! .....thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 20, 2024 11:50:37   #
Great variety - GREAT shots ! .....thanks for sharing
Go to
Apr 20, 2024 11:39:13   #
hdfilmnoir wrote:
Is printing to metal a good choice for wildlife?

This is the first time I will be using Bay Photo to print my bird picture on metal.
I have read everything I can on the subject and still have questions?
1. Not sure if I should print to canvas or metal for wildlife?
2. High Gloss, Mid-Gloss, Satin, Sheer Glossy, Sheer Satin, & Textured
3. Which is better a floating back which pulls the picture from the wall or just wire hang it?
4. I was thinking of going with the rounded corners and no frame?
I have attached a photo of what I’m thinking of printing.
Like to hear your thoughts and advise
Is printing to metal a good choice for wildlife? b... (show quote)


Sharply detailed subjects do well on glossy metal. The lesser the detail, the better it looks more diffused - with matte canvas being the most diffused. For your image, I would recommend a less glossy metal or a glossy canvas. I do like floating mounts.
.
Go to
Apr 19, 2024 09:55:28   #
The GBH shows the amazing AF of the RX10 amidst lots of back round clutter .......600mm f4 equiv., 1/1000, 400 ISO - this with a 50% crop in soft overcast light....

Another shot of the nest with mom, pop, and the single Eaglet munching on breakfast - 600mm f4 equiv. + 2X CIZ = 1200mm + 50% crop from about 130 yards distance - hand held/braced.

Thanks to ALL for stopping by and for comment .....
.


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1972 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.