Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Largobob
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 103 next>>
Feb 19, 2019 10:07:12   #
Nice images. For me, #1, #5, #7, and #8 are most appealing.
Go to
Feb 19, 2019 09:59:48   #
NCMtnMan wrote:
Check out the Sigma 150-600mm with 1.4 teleconverter. Excellent lens!


Sorry NCMtnMan. I have to disagree with this recommendation for this OP. This OP has a great Nikon FX camera, and primarily owns "Gold Band" lenses.

Ya, if you want to save a few bucks you might consider Sigma, Tamron, etc. They make good lenses....but if you want a lens that will function as designed, auto focus quickly and accurately, and produce a superb image on a Nikon camera (without having to buy and use a 'tap-in' or USB Focus dock to bring it into acceptable standards) my suggestion to the OP is to stick with Nikon/Nikkor.
Go to
Feb 19, 2019 07:38:25   #
Ahhh, yes. Leaf vs Focal Plane Shutter....

When I was 14, my dad gave me his seldom used 4x5" Speed Graphic....which was at the time, one of the most popular press cameras used. It had BOTH a Focal Plane and a leaf shutter. (Sometimes the challenge was remembering that when using the focal plane shutter, the leaf shutter had to be open....and vice versa.)
I learned to use both shutter types, to achieve my desired results.

Focal Plane shutters are big and clunky...more mass, more inertia, more vibration to blur your image. In comparison, the leaf shutter (housed within the lens) is smaller, less massive, and causes much less vibration that deteriorates image quality. The old rangefinder cameras (which also didn't have a mirror to slap up and down) and TLR medium format cameras all had leaf shutters. Hasselblad, Bronica, Mamiya have leaf shutters.....because leaf shutters offer advantages.

One disadvantage of having leaf shutter systems, is that every time you buy a new lens, you have to also buy the whole new shutter....generally raising the cost of those lenses. A have a collection of 'PG' lenses for my Bronica GS-1....each has its own internal, electronically controlled, leaf shutter...made by SEIKO. Another advantage to leaf shutters is when using iTTL speed light...because they are electronically controlled and faster to respond (less inertia)....the exposure tends to be more uniform and accurate.
Go to
Feb 19, 2019 06:37:06   #
Depending on the degree of accuracy you need, Harbor Freight has a small digital multimeter that they GIVE AWAY FREE, with other purchase. I have several and they work fine for automotive and household use.
Go to
Feb 19, 2019 06:04:18   #
larryepage wrote:
The difference is that 1.2 volts from a 1.5 volt alkaline cell (which I am supposing is what you are referencing) represents a fairly depleted cell, especially if it is a no-load open circuit voltage. Once you put that cell under load, the voltage is going to drop quite a bit further, I'd expect. And even if it is not supplying any power to the flash, its increased internal resistance (one characteristic of a depleted cell) could be causing further problems.

I have and use two SB-800 Speedlights, but do not have experience with the SB-900. It would not surprise me if its newer, presumably more sophisticated design and circuitry just behaves differently from the SB-800.
The difference is that 1.2 volts from a 1.5 volt a... (show quote)


I agree with larryepage. It is the CURRENT, not the voltage that does the work. The working voltage of a battery under load, can be significantly lower than the voltage measured without the load....which you did. I'm guessing the SB-900 draws/requires more current (amps, milliamps) than the other speed light. Those batteries could not deliver the required current to power the flash tube.
Go to
Feb 18, 2019 11:07:24   #
John Gerlach wrote:
Two things that continually amaze me when teaching photography is how badly clients have their cameras set up. So I am wondering how many here are taking advantage of some simple camera settings to help them shoot photos. First, I have no idea why this is so, but it seems all the cameras I look at require the user to active the cameras highlight alert to show blinkies in an image that is shot during playback. Why would you not want to have the highlight alert active? It seems to me the factory default should have the highlight alert on, and not have to be turned on by the user. I have been using the highlight alert exclusively for about four years now - more than a million shots - and I don't have any exposure problems. It is quick and easy and I can actually see the "blinkies" a lot easier than a little bit of rightmost data on the histogram. Second, for some reason cameras are set up to require the user to turn the shutter or aperture dial to the left (if using the top of the dial) to add light and move the histogram data to the right. It doesn't seem logical to have to turn dials left to move histogram data right. A client physicist pointed out this to me about 15 years ago and then I knew why I would use one of the custom settings on my cameras called "Reverse dial direction TV/AV." But it also works on manual. On all of my cameras, turning the exposure dials to the right adds light and moves the histogram data more right too. It is so logical to do it that way. I do have clients who insist they have learned to turn their dials left, to add light and move the histogram data right. But, when I observe them, I notice they are just as likely to turn the dial the wrong way as the right way, so I would point out that perhaps they should switch because it is not as intuitive as they assume it is for them.
Two things that continually amaze me when teaching... (show quote)


Love your rant....but you are describing malpractice among users. Anyone who knows the rudiments of photography, would know this.
Go to
Feb 18, 2019 09:30:25   #
juan_uy wrote:
Hi all, hope you can help me with some suggestions and/or opinions.

I have the opportunity to buy the Nikon AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED Lens, used, at a very good price from what I understand (asking USD 500, probably can get it by less) at least around my country.
I have thought of this lens to give macro a try and that may also be useful as a portrait lens.

It will be used on a D7200, so not sure if the crop factor would make it too long for portraits and I have read it has some breath issues for macro.
Could you let me know what your opinions are on this lens for these uses?
For portraits should I just stick to the 50mm 1.8?
For macros should I look for another one?

I have read very good reviews from Tokina's equivalent (if you can find it in stock), and I guess that there wouldn't be much difference in cost between new Tokina and used Nikon. I could wait until June/July when I may have the chance to buy a lens on the USA. Would you suggest this?

And finally, if I go for the used Nikon lens, is there something specific I could check/try with the lens to be sure there are no issues with it? (I think that is a little cheaper than I expected and that makes me doubt).

TIA as always!
Hi all, hope you can help me with some suggestions... (show quote)


I certainly can't judge the quality of the used lens you are considering. I own the Nikkor 105, and have found it to produce remarkably good images....when I do my part. I use the lens primarily for close-up/macro....flowers, insects, etc. I don't do portraits with this lens, so I have no comment there. If the used lens is in good condition, the asking price is more than fair.
Go to
Feb 18, 2019 08:43:48   #
Longshadow wrote:
Yup, yup, yup.
Then we (a group of us) found that DEC made a dual 5-1/4 floppy that would interface with the disk controller "cartridge". NO MORE TAPE! Discs 0 & 1!
And of course we flew & daisy chained the added address lead on 64K memory chips, making it a 64K machine!!!
Boy were we happy!!!


I took engineering courses as electives in college ('67-'72), including several 'Computer' courses. Programming languages included binary/hex/machine code, assembler, BASIC, FORTRAN, COBOL, etc. Later, as a Secondary Science Teacher, I got a job at a local Science Center that had a Honeywell Mainframe that it transitioned for "timesharing" applications. It was great fun. Our students re-wrote the entire operating system, to make it "bullet-proof" to the outside users. At the time, I believe it had 8K (no, that is not a typo) of RAM....the magnetic core memory was very expensive then.

At the same time, I remember Atari, NEC, Apple, and a few others. I went with Apple, with two 5-1/4" floppy drives. Because I was a programmer and 'application' software was not available, I had fun with this machine....it even had compilers for Fortran and advance basic. ( I'm guessing my machine was made in 'Ol' Waz's garage.) Except for my working life, I have personally stuck with Apple. Just a preference.....
Go to
Feb 18, 2019 07:50:55   #
Longshadow wrote:


(I forgot the nickname for the TRS-80! )


I'm not sure whether the name "Mickey Mouse" actually came from Walt Disney, or from the cassette tape drives of the TRS-80... How did we ever survive.
Go to
Feb 18, 2019 07:41:24   #
Nikonnorm wrote:
It's now called The Source.
https://www.thesource.ca/en-ca/shopFlyer


Sorry, Mate.....not at all the same.
Go to
Feb 18, 2019 07:33:19   #
Back in the day, I shot with the Mamiya 645. I too, love the images from "medium format." Now, I shoot with a Bronica GS-1 (6x7cm format) using 120 film...which is scanned into digital format. The cost of digital backs on medium format cameras is still prohibitive to me.
Go to
Feb 18, 2019 07:26:24   #
dpullum wrote:
Rich1939 I recall Tandy/Radio Shack in Nashville, it was spectacular. It had a central area which was entertaining... and 8 arms for different specialties... one for Software, one for children, an Audio, a TV, Computer and so on.

If ever I was bored, it was the place to go... it was mind exciting refreshing... each month new computers, new whatevers

Let us take a moment of silence and remember the loved Trash 80 ... "The TRS-80 Micro Computer System is a desktop microcomputer launched in 1977"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80

--------------------------------------
Largobob ... wow, such excitement when the box from Heathkit was delivered. I recall sitting and working and not eating all day... building and picture wiring was a passion.
Rich1939 I recall Tandy/Radio Shack in Nashville, ... (show quote)


My college roommate and I would assemble Heathkit components (mostly audio amps and pre-amps) for other students. We charged a "flat" fee for assembly, and would guarantee successful operation. Those were the days.
Go to
Feb 18, 2019 06:00:05   #
Longshadow wrote:
I miss it (when they carried LOTS of pieces parts) and Lafayette Radio.


LOL. Yes, I do remember Radio Shack/Tandy (trash-80 computer) and "Laugh-at-it" Radio.

But then there was Heathkit....kept me busy for hours!
Go to
Feb 17, 2019 08:01:03   #
MSW wrote:
ok- -here's the real deal
!. we are i***ts, politically. most americans cannot name their congressman and their senators.
2. we are i***ts. most of my daughters' contemporaries cannot explain how a bill becomes law.
3. we are i***ts. the few of us who bother to get off our collective dead duff and v**e go into the booth, hold the nose, and pull the lever.
4. we are i***ts. we allow the power elite to promise us the sun and moon, and then make a bunch of lame-o excuses when they just use their power to fill their own coffers and trample what few right we have remaining.
we are i***ts. if you have a degree from Harvard (or, for that matter, any Ivy League or other elite university), it appears that you're smart enough to run things, even though you have no experience in running anything... other than your mouth.
5. we are i***ts. If I don't v**e for the black or the woman, i'm a misogynist bigot r****t from hell exploited of the masses... if I don't v**e from some 'protestant fundamentalist,' then i'm a bomb throwing pinko anarchist.
6. we are i***ts. and we elect i***ts, and we deserve what we get.




ok - the rant is over … it's safe to come out now, but next time you see a car with state senate plates on it, go ahead and wave - using all of your fingers is optional.
ok- -here's the real deal br !. we are i***ts, po... (show quote)



yes, we are i***ts!
Go to
Feb 17, 2019 07:35:23   #
swartfort wrote:
Wow, I really liked the image. I love your enthusiasm, and am struck at the comments you received. Why would someone take a moment of their time just to dump on someone's happiness. There are some grumpy people here.

Just keep shooting and I am sure that your results will bring you the happiness you desire.

I would have a special "full moon" for those grumpy gus'


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 103 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.