sodapop wrote:
My sentiments exactly. When I started with digital I took a short course at he local Community college. the instructor was a professional, and recommended to all of us beginners the Photoshop and Lightroom combo. He said that for 10 bucks a month you can have the industry standard and grow into it. He said if you can afford a thousand dollar camera you surely can afford the price of a big mac sandwich once a month. I took his advice and am glad I never had to go through a bunch of free or substandard programs .Photoshop has a lot of things which I will probably never use. It also has a lot of things I thought I would never need and am glad I found them and use them. (A good dictionary has a lot of words that I will never use either, but they will always be there in case I need them.)
My sentiments exactly. When I started with digital... (
show quote)
Your 'professional' IMO did a disservice to his students by not at least touching on other software solutions, likely because he knows Adobe and didn't want to invest the time to learn anything else.
I've used a number of editors over the years, Adobe among them. I dropped my subscription to Adobe this year in favor of darktable/GIMP. For me, darktable is well ahead of Lightroom when it comes to editing RAW files (tons of powerful modules, most of which conform to its localized editing capabilities made possible by its powerful parametric masking tool). GIMP has also progressed nicely and now can handle up to 32-bit floating files. Updates, like the applications themselves, are always free.
So many Adobe users only know Adobe and seem threatened when any other solution is offered. The OP said clearly he/she did not want a subscription based platform. Why, then, do so many Adobe proponents pile on and hi-jack the thread to wage defense of Adobe. Four years of Adobe's subscription saved will go a long way towards purchasing new photographic equipment or funding forays into some remote area to actually shoot photos.
As an old film guy, I first learned PS after having learned how to scan negatives and slides. I've learned many different photo editing applications since then, and most of them are quite good. As a person new to editing, the OP might try Lightzone. Masking is similar to darktable, but all is done manually by clicking to create the mask. Lightzone is free and open source and can process RAW files. Rawtherapee is also well respected, although I much prefer darktable.
Whatever you choose, look for some online tutorials for your chosen software. You only really need to find one or two to get you started, then, progress through them at your own pace. There is no learning curve in any of these fine applications that cannot be tamed by a good tutorial or two.
The nonsense about Adobe being the 'industry standard' is, to me, just that. The 'industry standard' thing brings no magical processing power to your photos, and, the OP doesn't sound to me as though he/she is looking to submit photos to some high-powered gallery. Most of the Adobe users admit they do not use all of its many features, and I would say that most darktable/GIMP users do not use all the many features in that robust package. So, why should you pay for features you are not using? As for support, there is plenty of support for all of these packages online, so no need to stick with Adobe. You will not actually need more than one or two sources, but there exist plenty more for all packages discussed here.
My advice to the OP is to try the free stuff first, if you find it lacking (I bet you will not), you can always bite the bullet and go with Adobe.
Good luck, and have fun.
Caruso