Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: WNYShooter
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 580 next>>
Apr 21, 2023 06:03:29   #
And the Dem Useful I***ts here ate that letter up. I'm sure some of them will still believe it even after this admission--their heads so far up their asses.
Go to
Apr 20, 2023 04:40:21   #
CBS News Commits a Random Act of Journalism:

https://rumble.com/v2jbyj8-shock-cbs-covers-biden-crime-familys-newest-scandal.html
Go to
Apr 19, 2023 09:37:57   #
DennyT wrote:
Not quite true
Article V of the Constitution,

Under Article V of the Constitution, Congress is required to convene a constitutional convention if two-thirds of state legislatures (34 states) call for one


And there is no limit what the result of a constitutional convention could bring


Exactly what part of his post wasn't quite true?????????????????????????
Go to
Apr 19, 2023 08:20:46   #
https://alec.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/2023-16th-Rich-States-Poor-States.pdf
Go to
Apr 19, 2023 07:50:07   #
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/dollarization-happening-stunning-pace-jen-082144378.html

(Bloomberg) -- The dollar is losing its reserve status at a faster pace than generally accepted as many analysts have failed to account for last year’s wild exchange rate moves, according to Stephen Jen.

The greenback’s share in global reserves slid last year at 10 times the average speed of the past two decades as a number of countries looked for alternatives after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine triggered sanctions, Jen and his Eurizon SLJ Capital Ltd. colleague Joana Freire wrote in a note. Adjusting for exchange rate movements, the dollar has lost about 11% of its market share since 2016 and double that amount since 2008, they said.

“The dollar suffered a stunning collapse in 2022 in its market share as a reserve currency, presumably due to its muscular use of sanctions,” Jen and Freire wrote. “Exceptional actions taken by the US and its allies against Russia have startled large reserve-holding countries,” most of which are emerging economies from the so-called Global South, they said.

Jen is the former Morgan Stanley currency guru who coined the dollar smile theory.

Last year, Bloomberg’s gauge of the greenback surged as much as 16% as the conflict helped fuel a rise in global inflation that triggered widespread interest rate hikes which sank bond and currency markets alike. It finished the year up 6%.

Biden’s Dollar Weaponization Supercharges Hunt for Alternatives

Smaller nations are experimenting with de-dollarization while China and India are pushing to internationalize their currencies for trade settlement after the US and Europe cut Russian banks from the global financial messaging system known as SWIFT. There’s also concern the dollar may become a permanent political tool, or be used as a form of economic statecraft to put extra pressure on countries to enforce sanctions that they may disagree with.

The US currency now represents about 58% of total global official reserves, down from 73% in 2001 when it was the “indisputable hegemonic reserve,” the Eurizon pair said.

That said, the dollar’s role as an international currency won’t be challenged anytime soon as developing countries don’t yet have the ability to divest from the greenback for t***sactions due to its large, liquid and well-functioning financial markets, Jen and Freire wrote.

Still, the persistence of those conditions “is not preordained” and there may come a time when the rest of the world actively avoids using the dollar, they wrote.

“The prevailing view of ‘nothing-to-see-here’ on the US dollar as a reserve currency seems too innocuous and complacent,” the two wrote. “What needs to be appreciated by investors is that, while the Global South is unable to totally avoid using the dollar, much of it has already become unwilling to do so.”
Go to
Apr 19, 2023 06:07:02   #
https://www.theepochtimes.com/in-depth-bidens-ev-plan-could-be-key-to-chinas-global-economic-dominance_5201194.html

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) “strongest-ever” vehicle emissions standards designed to drive mass adoption of electric cars within a decade will increase the United States’ dependence on China, experts warn.

“It benefits the Chinese C*******t Party because they control the critical minerals supply chain that is going to be necessary to build out the batteries for those electric vehicles,” said Mandy Gunasekara, director of the Center for Energy and Conservation at the Independent Women’s Forum, a conservative think tank, in an April 17 interview with The Epoch Times.

Gunasekara served as chief of staff in the EPA under former President Donald Trump. She argued that the Trump administration did a better job of integrating environmental, economic, and strategic considerations than the Biden team, including when it came to the critical minerals used in electric vehicles (EVs) and other technologies.

“There was a concerted effort to ensure we weren’t setting regulations that shut down industrial activity here in the United States, knowing good and well that productivity doesn’t go away—it just materializes somewhere else, and typically a place like China,” she said.

The agency anticipates that with the new standards, two-thirds of new light-body vehicles will be electric by the model year 2032, up from less than six percent today.

The proposed rules, which would go into effect with cars from model year 2027 onward, target tailpipe emissions from light-, medium-, and heavy-body vehicles.

The EPA claims the standards would “significantly reduce climate and other harmful air pollution, unlocking significant benefits for public health, especially in communities that have borne the greatest burden of poor air quality.”

‘Industrial Suicide’
“This is industrial suicide,” said James Kennedy, a U.S. mine owner and rare earths expert, in an April 17 interview with The Epoch Times.

“By design, their goal is to wipe out, to destroy, to effectively terminate the massive economic investment that the auto companies have made in the internal combustion engine,” he said.

He outlined China’s long-range, strategic plan to dominate the mining and refining of rare earths, as well as the production of downstream technologies.

“No one in the West will accept the reality that China has total domain control at every level,” he added.

The rare earth metals terbium, holmium, and dysprosium are one key choke point for Chinese control over EV production.

Kennedy explained that the elements enable neodymium magnets to function at the high temperatures found in the motors of electric cars.

“China is the only country in the world, period, exclamation point, that can separate those materials,” he said.

U.S. Climate Envoy John Kerry has emphasized what he sees as the urgent need to cooperate with China in fighting c*****e c****e, recently informing Axios that talks between the powers have stalled due to escalating geostrategic tensions.

In Gunasekara’s view, the Chinese C*******t Party has succeeded by banking on the Democrats’ climate agenda, which generally goes far beyond what Republicans advocate.

“They’re the ones who, at the end of the day, get to profit off of our bad policies,” she said.

Conflict Within Biden Administration

Nadia Schadlow, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute who served on the National Security Council under Trump, thinks the Biden administration is not entirely off track regarding critical minerals and other materials that go into EVs.

“We should be giving the administration credit for pushing the onshoring of these important and critical inputs,” she told The Epoch Times in an April 17 interview.

Along these lines, the Department of Energy on April 4 announced $16 million in funding for a rare earth and critical minerals extraction and separation refinery.

“President Biden’s Investing in America agenda is helping reduce our overreliance on adversarial nations and positioning the country as a global manufacturing leader,” Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said in an accompanying statement.

Last February, the administration announced $35 million in funding to Nevade-based MP Materials, which operates the country’s only rare earths mine in Mountain Pass, California.

Rare earths also figured in Biden’s February 2021 executive order on America’s supply chains, and in February 2022 remarks at a roundtable on bolstering America’s supply chains, when he listed them among the critical materials that are “badly needed for so many American products.”

“The problem is, they’re in conflict with some of the other parts of the administration that are less concerned about the competition with China and more focused on traditional environmental issues,” Schadlow said.

Like others who spoke with The Epoch Times, she drew attention to the slow pace of mine permitting.

“If there is a disconnect with actual capabilities–whether charging stations around the country or minerals sources in the United States or in allied countries–then the timing just does not seem to work,” she said.

Gunasekara stressed the need for effective p**********l leadership, given China’s fundamental challenge to the United States.

“I do think it’s going to take a strategic initiative from the top to address this situation, because it hasn’t been addressed in past years. There’s a lot of small decisions that will have to be made to ensure that the United States isn’t shifting reliance on OPEC into reliance on the Chinese C*******t Party,” she said.

The EPA, in response to a query from The Epoch Times on whether the new rules will aid China, defended the proposed standards, saying that they are “in line with the direction the American auto industry is already going.” The industry has made significant investments in zero-emissions vehicles, which the administration is building upon, an EPA spokesperson said.

“In addition, there is enormous investment in zero-emissions vehicle technology and chip manufacturing, for example there has been more than $120 billion of private investments in EVs and batteries in the United States since President Biden has taken office,” the spokesperson said.

“With President Biden’s investment in accelerating American zero emission vehicles production, the U.S. is positioned to lead the clean vehicles future.”

‘China Empowerment Plan’
“The Biden EPA plan is the China empowerment plan,” said Marc Morano, executive director of ClimateDepot.com, a project of the Washington-based think tank Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, in an April 17 interview with The Epoch Times.

Morano, like other experts who spoke with The Epoch Times, questioned the EPA’s ambitious projections of large-scale EV adoption within ten years.


“The plan, if it actually goes forward, will create chaos in the automobile industry,” Morano said.

Kennedy agreed, saying “They are so unrealistic.”

He pointed out that the mass adoption of EVs and other green technologies would require extraordinarily high quantities of lithium, rare earths, copper, and other minerals.

“There’s just not enough of these materials to go around,” he said.

Kennedy also voiced skepticism about claims that China’s hold on rare earths has relaxed, now that their production has fallen to as low as 60 percent of the global total.

“China raised the margins available to resource producers to the point where they would go out, develop projects, and start shipping to China. China didn’t want to pollute its country anymore or exhaust its resources, so it created a margin opportunity for producers–and that is where we’re at at this exact moment,” he said.


He provided The Epoch Times with a pre-released paper that he wrote with other experts from around the planet, including rare earth industry insiders who chose to remain anonymous out of concern over the professional consequences of highlighting China’s dominance in that sector.

In it, Kennedy and his colleagues argued that China is positioned to “disrupt the production of close to 100 percent of the world’s REE [rare earth element]-dependent technologies and products, including U.S. weapon systems.”

“Rare earths are critical to many military systems. You’re going to see the same set of problems of needing to loosen permitting requirements in that domain as well,” Schadlow, of the Hudson Institute, told The Epoch Times.

Epoch Times Photo
Jeremy Catholique, a member of the Lutsel K’e Dene First Nation and shift supervisor at Vital Metals’ Nechalacho rare earth elements mine in the Northwest Territories, overlooks bags of concentrated ore ready to be shipped to the plant in Saskatoon. (Bill Braden/Vital Metals)
Yet, even just when it comes to commercial vehicles, China’s monopolistic power over critical minerals gives them leverage–and not just over the United States and its domestic automakers.

“At the end of the day, they control the density of the economy of the adversarial country. They quit shipping this material to General Motors or Tesla or Lexus–they’re literally holding a threat over all of these countries,” Kennedy, the mine owner, told The Epoch Times.

The Bigger Picture
Morano said that the EPA’s proposed rules are just the latest effort to boost EVs and end gas-powered cars, not just in the United States, but around the world.

Notably, the EPA rolled them out one year after British climate economist Baron Nicholas Stern told the World Bank that the planet needs “clarity on timescales” for banning the sale of such vehicles.

Oxford, England, has led the way in the “15-minute city” concept, which restricts free markets and free movement in the name of going green.

Meanwhile, various localities in the United States are banning or otherwise heavily restricting the construction of new gas stations.

Morano thinks the rules will raise the demand for used cars, as Americans struggle to buy expensive new electric vehicles, all as the cost of charging increases too.

“You can look to Cuba to find out what it’s like to have a raging used car market because that’s what we’re looking at here,” he said.

Kennedy said, “It’s all for an idea that Mother Nature can’t sustain.”

The White House did not return a request for comment.
Go to
Apr 19, 2023 06:00:02   #
travelwp wrote:
Upon proven guilty, FOX says this:

"This settlement reflects FOX's continued commitment to the highest journalistic standards."

What the F-ck does that mean?


Um, No, They weren't proven guilty, the two parties settled in the civil trial.

Guilt is proven in criminal cases, no civil cases.
Go to
Apr 18, 2023 06:32:24   #
dpullum wrote:
A well-designed beer ad and it then brings political affiliation to the local bar. If you are not drinking the ultra-right then you are not one of us and must be a "liberal". The brief flash of a woman in the tub trying to be masculine and our man's man standing outside the "womans room" then suddenly the "MEN'S" suggests real men drink Ultra Right Beer.


I guess the whole thing went right over your head. BTW, the "woman" in the tub is really a male pretending to be a female.
Go to
Apr 18, 2023 05:49:41   #
https://youtu.be/KUokwmZcFMM
Go to
Apr 18, 2023 04:25:52   #
Bob Smith wrote:
Are assault gun owners mainly Republican male's that need them to boost their masculinity because they are either socially /sexually inadequate or have repressed homosexual feelings.


I know and have competed against a good many women, biological women BTW, who own and enjoy shooting your so called "assault guns", would you pose the same question to them???
Go to
Apr 17, 2023 18:21:43   #
Bob Smith wrote:
No seriously why are so many Republicans gay


More importantly, why do you care?
Go to
Apr 17, 2023 17:20:48   #
Bob Smith wrote:
Why are so many Republican supporters homosexual


Better check the closet door, your true Liberal colors are leaking out.
Go to
Apr 17, 2023 17:11:40   #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
You can also conceal carry into bars in TN... and other states.

This law makes absolutely no sense what-so-ever! The requirement of "complete sobriety" is a joke. What is the purpose of entering a bar if it is NOT to drink?

I'm sure the AHs like wnyshooter will be able to explain.


Plenty of people go into bars and don't drink alcohol--that's why they serve non-alcoholic drinks. I know tons of musicians who play in bars regularly and never touch a drop of alcohol. A great many bars serve food, and many go there for just that.

I will never understand your imbecilic idea that making sure a business or area is considered gun free based on some arbitrary reasoning automatically makes people safer. Statistically, the majority of criminal scumbags who have intentionally committed mass shootings, specifically targeted places where they knew most if not all would be unarmed, as those law-abiding folks would be following the well-intentioned but completely STUPID designation of "Gun Free Zone".

The more accurate label for these designated areas is "Defenseless Victim Zone."
Go to
Apr 17, 2023 16:49:36   #
Frank T wrote:
Although comparing guns to cars is a bit ridiculous, let's do it just for fun.
1. There have been numerous court cases throughout the country regarding bartenders serving inebriated customers.
2. There have been numerous court cases where the bartender or host was held liable for serving an intoxicated person who left their bar or residence and got into an accident while operating a vehicle while intoxicated.
3. Bartenders, in many states must undergo training regarding serving alcohol and in particular serving alcohol to obviously intoxicated persons.

So let's carry these precedents over to people carrying firearms, and hold not just the inebriated person liable for his actions but extend that to the person serving them alcohol.

Seems completely logical to me. One problem would be that people would violate the rules by carrying a weapon concealed, into a bar without the knowledge of the proprietor, and in violation of the established rules.

In that case, there needs to be a separate criminal charge for that action and as there is no law addressing that, another law will have to be passed.

Yes, it's all very difficult, but so is telling a mother that her child won't be coming home because he was shot by a drunk.
Although comparing guns to cars is a bit ridiculou... (show quote)


Driving is not a constitutional right, so your comparison is complete bogus, as are most all of your ridiculous arguments.
Go to
Apr 17, 2023 07:24:29   #
Triple G wrote:
You can in TN depending on who is selling the gun. It can be done at shows, online, etc. Who enforces whether a gun seller is "casual"? In TN, you can buy and carry without a background check.

https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/attorneygeneral/documents/ops/2016/op16-044.pdf

https://www.chicagotribune.com/nation-world/ct-aud-nw-tennessee-guns-background-checks-20210408-ho6prsoc3nfyhh5kfs2473i3re-story.html


Again for the I***TS who can't read or comprehend:

ALL of the insurance companies who will underwrite gunshow events in the US REQUIRE Federal background checks for ALL firearm sales on the premises during the term of coverage. Also, pretty much all of the venue insurance underwriters also require the checks for such events. The insurance underwriting requirements are in addition to any and all local, state, or federal laws.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 580 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.