Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: foathog
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 357 next>>
Nov 30, 2023 14:09:13   #
I think the camera companies, editing, and printing assume everyone knows all about it. I think they are missing the boat with people who are new to it. I've looked at some tutorials and they seem to leave the newbie in the dust. But now we're starting a new thread. LOL That's the main reason cell phones are popular.....it's easy.
Go to
Nov 30, 2023 14:02:12   #
It can be fairly frustrating trying to learn all this stuff. I bet a lot of people weren't prepared for it.
Go to
Nov 30, 2023 13:53:30   #
I seriously doubt it.
Go to
Nov 30, 2023 13:05:46   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
We haven't heard a peep from the OP either.


He committed suicide
Go to
Nov 30, 2023 12:29:25   #
I'm reading all this stuff and can't help thinking what a newbie might be thinking. He's probably selling all of his/her equipment as we speak. LOL
Go to
Nov 29, 2023 11:00:38   #
Cheese wrote:
But they did mention the aperture range:


I didn't see that.
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 13:46:59   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
So, you understand the responses so far, right?

This prime lens has a single 100mm focal length. The f/2.8 aperture can vary from f/2.8 to f/32. As others noted, variable aperture lenses are more typical of variable focal-length zoom lens, not a prime lens (aka a fixed focal length). One would not typically identify a prime lens as also having a 'fixed aperture', as that's how a prime lens operates; the focal length doesn't change, and the aperture changes under the control of the photographer or camera, not because the focal length changes.
So, you understand the responses so far, right? br... (show quote)


LOL. I was questioning why they gave the "impression" that it might be JUST 2.8. I saw other ads for it that said just what you said. (f2.8 to f32) But they didn't mention "fixed f 2.8". If they had mentioned the aperture range I would have bought it. Like I said, I have the EF L version of this lens. I was wondering if this might be something different. Well as it turns out the lens has been sold. I'm out of luck for now. I put my name on a waiting list. Thanks Paul.....and everyone else who helped out.
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 11:07:50   #
lamiaceae wrote:
It is a poorly written sales listing. Seems to have a few errors and ambiguities and possibly unintentional non-sense. But it seems like an interesting and nice lens at what seems to me like a good price. You should buy it if it will serve your needs.


I have the EF 100mm 2.8L but it uses the adapter on my R5. I have yet to buy an RF lens and thought this would be an opportunity to do so. I'm pretty sure I can sell the EF since it too is an excellent lens.
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 10:10:56   #
https://www.usa.canon.com/shop/p/refurbished-rf100mm-f2-8-l-macro-is-usm
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 09:52:08   #
To me it means that you get 2.8 and 2.8 only. who the hell would want that? LOL
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 09:51:13   #
It's on Canon's site. Part of their special pricing sale going on
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 09:38:18   #
Oh that's an "L" lens
Go to
Nov 26, 2023 09:35:59   #
Canon has a refurb RF 100MM fixed 2.8 macro lens for sale. What do they mean my fixed? Maybe I'm not up on new terminology. It wouldn't be the first time

Harry
Go to
Nov 23, 2023 12:04:35   #
JohnSwanda wrote:
I wonder if the spider would hold its pose long enough to do focus stacking.


LOL. another thing you MIGHT try is to focus on a part of the body that is more towards the "center" of the subject. "perhaps" you gave up some focus area in front of the subject. Did you use spot metering? Or step back a touch.
Go to
Nov 18, 2023 12:40:30   #
DavidM wrote:
Here's an excellent video explaining ISO and it's use..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOdlDyolhr0


Watch some of his other stuff too. He's good
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 357 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.