Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Caysnowman
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 29 next>>
Nov 7, 2015 16:54:18   #
I have been experiencing a problem - especially on the UHH site - where the page I am viewing suddenly closes and I get an error message that "There has been a problem with this page and that it will be reopened". The last incident was today while viewing Amyj's White Egret pic in the BIF/BOW Section when I tried to DL the pic. Sometimes the page reloads quickly but usually it hangs. I have an iPad2 with 64Mb ( 30 Mb available); had the same experience on two other IOS devices running something earlier than IOS 9.0. Anyone have an idea of what is causing this?

Thanks, Bill
Go to
Nov 6, 2015 11:33:14   #
sueyeisert wrote:
I used window for over 20+ years several months with Mac OS I decided never to go back. See if you can get One to one lessons, if you live near an Apple store. One to One are private lessons on Mac for a year for $99. The best bargain you'll ever get.


I believe Apple does not offer One to One anymore.

Bill
Go to
Nov 2, 2015 18:09:39   #
MtnMan wrote:
I'd estimate 50-80 yards. I used 500mm on a DX camera and didn't crop.


Thanks. Really nice work.

Bill
Go to
Nov 2, 2015 16:20:42   #
MtnMan wrote:
In Badlands National Park, South Dakota. Please download to view.


One of the best Sheep pics I have seen. Nice job! Any idea how far away he was?

Bill
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 21:17:20   #
Chuck_893 wrote:
I'd be happy to, especially since I just did it over because I decided I didn't like the first version. Please bear in mind that I am very, very new at Lightroom, so it's all part of the learning curve.

The original capture was a Nikon raw (NRW in my Nikon P7800). For illustration I zeroed one out which shows that it was really awful blah. The overcast was pretty heavy. There was just no light. Ick. But sometimes I hafta move on and I like to joke that, "Ya takes yer pitcher wiv' the light ya gots." :mrgreen:

The first rework, which I now think is not as great as I first thought, was tinkered with a bunch of stuff.
--I tried out a bunch of Lightroom's onboard presets, finally settling on "punch."
--I worked the highlights and shadows,
--then used the graduated filter on the sky only and pulled the exposure down to "richen" the sky
--and also adjusted the whites, clarity and saturation
--Then I used the adjustment brush to select the water, pulled the exposure down a little and kicked up the clarity.

I thought it was okay (just okay) :? , but I kept looking at it and not liking---something.

The final one below is where I'm at now.
--I started all the way back from from the zeroed version and adjusted overall exposure and contrast
--adjusted clarity, shadows, highlights, vibrance and saturation.

Once I thought I had the overall picture about right
--applied the linear graduated filter again to the sky only
--once again pulled the sky exposure down
--increased the saturation
--and the vibrancy

Then I pulled another linear graduated filter up from the bottom, which is different from what I did before when I only masked the water
--I pulled the exposure down

The idea was to focus attention on the town across the ship canal.

Hope that helps, Bill. Thanks for asking, but do remember that I am a rank beginner in Lightroom; I'm more accustomed to Photoshop. :-D
I'd be happy to, especially since I just did it ov... (show quote)


Really like your 2nd effort. I'm in the throws of leaving Aperture and have had a couple of false starts with LR; your much more adept than I am. For some reason I just can't get my arms around that program, even after spending time searching the I Net and attending some classes locally. Just have to push on I guess. With all the attention Adobe & LR are getting recently I hope they can reverse course and not follow the Apple / Aperture path and really mess up a program that is liked by many.

Thanks for help. Bill
Go to
Oct 24, 2015 17:57:15   #
O
Chuck_893 wrote:
So this happened.

At the beginning of 2015 I was happily plodding along, shooting 100% jpegs in my tiny-sensored compact camera, processing in a slightly obsolete version of PS-Elements, doin’ pretty good I thought…

Then, for reasons not now entirely well understood, I took a crack at raw capture (which I had not previously because of an inability to process it).

WELL one thing led to another, and in the space of less than a year (what a difference a year makes) I have been fully converted, an ultra-orthodox raw shooter, AND I subscribed to the Creative Cloud for ten bucks a month.

Who knew? :mrgreen:

For all of my old jpeg-only pals, fear not, I will not try to convert you! Y’all keep on keepin’ on. This was just my personal choice to drink the raw kool-aid. I’ve always been a fan of post-processing. I don’t mind hours at a computer one bit. You do. That’s fine.

What I’m doing now is learning as much as I can as fast as I can. I really like Lightroom, but I spent years learning Elements so I’m pretty comfortable with Phull-dress Photoshop CC, and there are things I can do there that I don’t think I can do (or do as well) in Lightroom, and Adobe provides both presumably for a reason, so I use both as needed.

(Incidentally, I love what Lightroom can do with some of my old jpegs. I’ve gone back and reworked some stuff (I have always kept an untouched SOOC jpeg in case I want to start over—I always “save as” edited versions)).
b i color=green So this happened. /color /i ... (show quote)


Chuck: would you mind sharing you LR work flow on the Houghton / Handcock shot?
TIA Bill
Go to
May 19, 2015 14:26:01   #
A recent thread posed - I think in jest - a picture of an old Chevy Truck with what appeared to be a sheepherders trailer on the back that with a bit of fixing could make an ideal camper for photographic exploring - "The search may be over... May hit the road w/camera's"

I have been looking for something that is smaller that would tow behind a mid size SUV but have not found anything that appears to be durable.

Anyone have any suggestions??

Bill
Go to
May 16, 2015 21:52:56   #
Really nice work!

2 & 3 appeal to me especially; 2 because of the virtually perfect spacing between the Falcon's and 3 because of the skill required to do that maneuver. Flew some formation a while back and always needed visual contact so you could align reference points to give the desired position. Don't think these guys used that technique. Wonder what the feelings were the first time they attempted this?

Bill
Go to
May 9, 2015 17:52:08   #
bcheary wrote:
:lol: :lol: Innovation, innovation, innovation. There is always someone coming up with something new. :shock:



Hiller flew a 'copter in the 1950's with Ram jets in the rotor tips but it did not get produced.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiller_YH-32_Hornet

Bill
Go to
May 1, 2015 15:39:48   #
Don Fischer wrote:
I was just looking through my D7000 manual and didn't find the AF fine tune. Could you tell me where it is? Thanks


Here is a link to a YouTube page that explains one way of calibrating the D7000. The menu selections are at the 25% point.

There are other techniques, some require purchase of targets and other use yardsticks. Google should have them all

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4jUXryI8Jk



Bill
Go to
May 1, 2015 14:36:19   #
Caysnowman wrote:
If you are leaning toward a 15in MBP, check out this site on MacRumors - http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#Retina_MacBook_Pro.

The 13in model has been upgraded recently but the 15in was not because of INTEL processor delivery problems.

If you browse the OWC site - http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/Apple_MacBook_MacBook_Pro/Upgrade, they will tell you if you can add more memory to your computer and for that matter, add a SSD. There are videos explaining the upgrade process that are very clear. I have done three memory upgrades to my MBP's and found the process simple and the results satisfying.

Bill
If you are leaning toward a 15in MBP, check out th... (show quote)


Sorry for the double post.
Go to
May 1, 2015 14:33:56   #
suntouched wrote:
Thanks to everyone for their input. I will take my laptop to Apple and check out the cost and efficiency of adding SS drive to my current computer as compared to just buying a new one with 16 G Ram and SS drive. I will post later on for anyone interested.


If you are leaning toward a 15in MBP, check out this site on MacRumors - http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#Retina_MacBook_Pro.

The 13in model has been upgraded recently but the 15in was not because of INTEL processor delivery problems.

If you browse the OWC site - http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/Apple_MacBook_MacBook_Pro/Upgrade, they will tell you if you can add more memory to your computer and for that matter, add a SSD. There are videos explaining the upgrade process that are very clear. I have done three memory upgrades to my MBP's and found the process simple and the results satisfying.

Bill
Go to
Apr 28, 2015 17:55:42   #
sye wrote:
With summer vacations starting to kick in, it would be nice to find out about the quality of water overseas. Could the same thing be said about tap water in Europe, Asia or South America ?


Way back when Viet Nam was not a vacation destination, we would go into Saigon for overnights before flying out the next day. We were STRONGLY cautioned to drink only the water that was in the room that was stored in "thermos" containers because it had been purified.

One morning we were leaving the hotel at Oh - Dark - Thirty and while walking down the hall we saw the bus boy filling up a bunch of thermos bottles from the tap in the wall that was used to provide water for washing the floor, sidewalk and many other things.

All the times I had stayed in Saigon, I never experienced anyone on our crew or knew of any other crew's that suffered any ill effects.

Lucky or ?? :shock:

Bill
Go to
Apr 24, 2015 15:47:38   #
Mac wrote:
Thanks Steve
I was considering that new 300mm f/4 lens, especially because it is so light and compact. Someone (I forget her name :oops: ) posted some pics taken with that new lens and and a 1.4 TC that were very sharp and detailed. However when looking about that lens online there were comments about problems with the VR and I decided to go with the 80-400mm I have no doubt that Nikon will correct the VR problems on the 300mm in short order, but I didn't want to wait.


IIRC Photography Life did a short review on the 300/F4 VR and felt that performance of the lenses varied from sample to sample; thinking was that this may be due to the samples being from very early production units.

Bill
Go to
Apr 24, 2015 15:31:46   #
Didereaux wrote:
That is really a nice shot. The water shows movement without looking like shaving cream, and the water highlights on the red rock is really good. kudos


:thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 29 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.