Re internet trolls

The recommendation to decrease trolling is to decrease the gratification that the troll gets. That is, he enjoys stirring up the hornets’ nest. The more sound and fury he generates, the more he enjoys it. Therefore, the best way to limit trolling is to totally ignore the troll. Let him know that he’s not worth replying to
http://americablog.com/2014/02/dark-psychology-internet-trolls.html

http://www.salon.com/2012/08/01/online_comments_are_toxic_salpart/

Signs that your trolling is unsuccesful:
*Your victim identifying you as a troll.
*Identifying yourself as a troll.
*Your efforts being ignored.
*Being counter-trolled

What bald faced liar you are. You state that the US military is larger than the rest of the world's put together. Where do you get this wild information? Or do you just as usual make stuff up and throw it out there. Once again you have told a lie. Just China's military by itself is three times the size of ours. Three times the size. Here is a list of the world's military by country and their size in man power. Since you are a Marxist I am sure that you were already aware of this. You really do hate our armed forces don't you. You sniveling idiot. What a liar.

Read this, that is if you can read>

Manpower doesnt win conflicts any more. aircraft carriers, tanks, etc.
For example, the US has according to your wiki, over 4000 combate aircraft in comparison to the next on the list which is Russia with only 1510.

I suppose if we still fought wars hand to hand with swords and spears who has the most canon fodder would matter....but this is the 21st century.

According to this article the US spends as much as the rest of the world. So it doesnt spend more, it spends as much as the rest.
http://www.military1.com/army/article/402211-how-much-stronger-is-the-us-military-compared-with-the-next-strongest-power

China has less than 500 Type 99 tanks, that have just been developed, and are not even close to being as good as the Abrams. We have 8,700 Abrams.

We have 10 aircraft carriers. The good kind. Everyone else has 10. Combined. And they are mostly small ships that can launch helicopters.

There are 8,400 attack helicopters in the world. The U.S. has 6,400 of them.

So, as I said before a good place to start cutting spending would be the military budget.

Now go to your room.

ah, here we go again with the 50 mm lenses. the f1:1.8 will deliver better results across the board. less comma and chromatic aberration. as lenses move up in aperture and become "faster", they give up certain properties. the f1:1.8 will provide better edge to edge results. the only high speed 50mm (or thereabouts) lenses really worth owning and using are the nikkor nocto and the leitz noctilux. these are made specifically for making images in low light and are optically corrected accordingly. they are also very, very expensive.

'Ya know Trixie you might be right using the term "whore" was a bit indelicate. Let me see if I can clean it up a bit.

How about this:

Just curious, are you a prostitute and just using this site to solicit business? Just wondering. Most of your posts are so retarded and nonsensical that it cannot be possible that you are on this site to contribute to the conversation.

How is that? Does that suit you better? Now I just had a thought that maybe it was not the term whore that bothered you. Maybe it was retarded that bothered you? So let me try it another way:

Just curious, are you a whore and just using this site to solicit business? Just wondering. Most of your post are so senile and nonsensical that it cannot be possible that you are on this site to contribute to the conversation.

How is that? Better now? Let me know if one works better than the other.

Trixie, report away. Report away. I could care less.