Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: mwsilvers
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1066 next>>
Jan 19, 2024 13:27:50   #
User ID wrote:
Yes ... sort of.

Its not really a behavior, in the sense that magnified MF does not cancel peaking but peaking is often barely effective with the magnifier enabled. Take aim at some very contrasty hard edged details and you will rather likely detect a bit of peaking.

----------------------------------------------

Im quite pleased with that situation. I have some cameras that show plenty of peaking when magnifying for MF, and I hafta cancel peaking if I am relying mainly on magnified MF. Heavy magnified peaking obscures fine details as it comes ALMOST into focus, such that you cannot see to finalize EXACT focus.

IOW, peaking is best for a quick focus thaz sufficient with smaller apertures, but its a liability during the really critical magnified focus thaz needed with wider apertures.
Yes ... sort of. br br Its not really a I behavi... (show quote)


I mostly use peaking and magnification together on my Nikon Z fc and find the combination very useful. The peaking sensitivity I use does not obscure fine detail. I can set peaking to one of four colors, white, red, yellow, and blue. There are also three levels of sensitivity settings. While I will occasionally change the color and strength of the peaking, depending on circumstances, I find using blue at the standard sensitivity setting works best for me in most situations.
Go to
Jan 17, 2024 13:45:01   #
Longshadow wrote:
The question was prompted by a comment in another thread.

INSTRUCTIONS: Post only ONE WORD: "RAW"; "JPEG"; or "BOTH".
No dissertations, no explanations as to why, no opinions, no recommendations,...
no matter how badly you feel you have to.

ANY response other than ONE of the three words will not be tallied.


Both
Go to
Jan 17, 2024 08:28:56   #
Picture Taker wrote:
I would take your 18 to 400 and the extender maybe.


None of the Canon extenders will work with that lens. I believe the Tamron teleconverters are also not compatible with the Tamron 18-400. The 18-400 superzoom is intended as a casual vacation walk around lens, and while it can provide pleasing results for many people it is not a high quality optic and may not meet the needs of most discerning photographers. I had one for a over a year and it was a lot of fun to use because of it extreme focal range but in the end I wanted better results from my images and sold it.
Go to
Jan 17, 2024 08:04:46   #
gwilliams6 wrote:
Latest Top Ten Cameras in sales at Yodobashi Camera stores in Japan. How did your fav brand fair?

1) Sony A7CII
2) Sony A7IV Kit
3) Sony A7CII Kit
4) Sony A7RV
5) Sony A7IV
6) Nikon Z8
7) Canon EOS R6II
8) Nikon Zfc
9) Fujifilm X-T5
10) Canon EOS R50 kit


It looks like my 2 -1/2 year old Nikon Z fc is still in the top 10. Nice to see that it is still very popular. This retro camera body certainly is not everyone's cup of tea. As I've mentioned before, I use it almost entirely with prime lenses, most of which are manual focus only. It is the most enjoyable shooting experience I have ever had with a digital camera and I am very satisfied with the images I get with it.
Go to
Jan 12, 2024 11:15:02   #
ChrisKet wrote:
I’ve taken this approach for a very long time. My outgoing voicemail even says as much…”Leave me a message, unless you’re trying to sell me something; in which case I’ll block your number.”

I have had many legitimate people who start their message to me laughing and saying it’s the best message they’ve heard!

~Chris

Scams and most unrequested sales calls use spoofy numbers so that the caller ID you see is not the actual number of the person calling. Those numbers belong to people who have nothing to do with the person calling you.

While the odds of it happening were extremely small, I once even got a scam sales call on my cell phone from my own cell phone number.

As a result of the wide spread use of spoofied phone numbers, threatening to block these phone numbers is a useless exercise. Scammers and unexpected sales calls from people who use spoofied phone numbers can't be blocked and really don't care is that you block the phone number coming up on your caller ID. They constantly use different spoofied phone numbers as part of their scams and to call you back 5 minutes later using a different stolen phone number.
Go to
Jan 12, 2024 09:23:27   #
Stan Fayer wrote:
Is it worth shooting Film if all your going to do is scan and digitalize your negatives, or is it self defeating.


If you need to ask the question you probably should not be shooting film. Dedicated film shooters should know why they ae shooting film, and how they plan to process it to get the results they want.
Go to
Jan 9, 2024 11:44:34   #
Delderby wrote:
The pic included in your reply is, I think, very pleasant and well exposed, however it is quite soft. I would not expect anything else from a 30x zoom, and personally I wouldn't go there. Having said that, I achieved a sharper and much more acceptable result in 30 seconds after using Easy Photo Unblur - but that's not the point - I am sure that with my M4/3 Leica, 14mp, 3x zoom, cropped to same view I wouldn't need EPU.
My conclusion is - larger sensor and don't crowd the pixels.
The pic included in your reply is, I think, very p... (show quote)


It's hard to say how sharp it is because what's presented is only a lower resolution thumbnail. It's more than likely that if he had attached a higher resolution downloadable version It would have been much sharper.
Go to
Jan 4, 2024 16:36:26   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Philosophical? He’s a flat out conspiracy theorist.


That is true, but he has posted thousands of videos over the years and many seem more philosophical to me even though I usually don't agree with him.
Go to
Jan 4, 2024 13:54:15   #
Urnst wrote:
what happened to him?


Apparently, nothing happened to him. Here is the link to his active YouTube page with 4 videos from the last week alone. It just appears that he has not been doing any lens reviews for quite some time. His current videos are mostly philosophical.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVcxJ9k14bi__-uA1cGkEcA
Go to
Jan 2, 2024 21:52:42   #
Ruraldi wrote:
Liberty state park in NJ. You can get the back of the Statue of Liberty in the photo if you want.
Also the teardrop memorial in Jersey City, NJ - the container ship port across from the teardrop memorial works great too.


There are actually two different skylines in NYC. One is in lower Manhattan and is accessible from Liberty State Park. The much larger and more iconic skyline, is in midtown Manhattan. You can't get good shots of it from Liberty State Park. For that, Weehawken is the best place to go. A very wide angle lens or the ability to capture multiple images for panoramas should be considered.
Go to
Jan 2, 2024 21:46:48   #
User ID wrote:
I already asked my sister in midtown. Appparently, you cant see NYC from NYC.

I guess its like the forest and the trees.


Well, it depends on the perspective you want. You can see a lot from the 86th floor observatory of the Empire State building located at 5th Avenue and 34th Street.
Go to
Jan 1, 2024 04:34:40   #
btbg wrote:
What you say here is very interesting to me. Like you I have changed my gear requirements over time. The difference is we have gone the opposite direction.

Sometimes I am envious of people who have been able to go lightweight. It gets tiresome lugging around heavy gear all the time, but that's kind of the life of a sports photographer. Instead of going light I now have a Nikon Z9, A Nikon D85070-200 and a Nikon D5 that I carry around all the time. Two 70-200 f2.8 lens a Sigma sport 150-600, a Nikon Z400f2.8, three flash, Two full size tripods, remote control equipment for all three cameras, and then assorted small zooms like the 12-24 and the 24-70 f2.8 lenses. It takes two bags to carry all the stuff and when shooting baseball it also requires a ladder. Sometimes it takes three trips from the parking lot to the photo shoot.

I'm thinking about going smaller when I retire. Do you ever miss having a big zoom lens for the photography that you do?
What you say here is very interesting to me. Like ... (show quote)


"Do you ever miss having a big zoom lens for the photography that you do?"

Not at all. When I was a Canon shooter, (7D Mark II), I owned a Canon 70-200 F/2.8 L with a Canon 2X Extender. I rarely used the lens, with or without the extender. The two lenses I used the most were the Canon 15-85mm F/3.5-5.6 IS USM zoom lens and the Canon 35mm f/2 IS USM prime. Even with the 15-85 the majority of my images were at 50mm or wider. I shoot only static images, many in low natural light.

My preferred lenses these days are my three Voigtlander fast manual focus prime lenses designed specifically for the Nikon Z mount, the DX D23mm f/1.2 Nokton, the DX D35mm f/1.2 Nokton, and the FX 40mm f/1.2 Nokton. The two DX lenses are tiny and weigh a bit less than 8oz each. the 40mm FX lens is not much bigger weighing in at a bit over 11oz. All these Voigtlanders have electrical contracts and pass metadata and aperture to the body like an AF lens The only AF prime I use is the DX TTArtisan 28mm f/2.8 which, like the Voigtlanders, has a metal barrel and is quite tiny weighing a bit over 3 oz. I also have a few other TTArtisan MF primes. I really enjoy using manual focus primes on my retro Nikon Z fc body.
Go to
Dec 31, 2023 15:21:52   #
bsprague wrote:
So far, most of the responses are about favorite full sized tripods.

My thought was a possible exchange about small to tiny tripods.


A couple of us mentioned the very compact Peak Design tripods. I forgot to mention I also have a much smaller, much lighter and even more compact Benro tripod which is occasionally useful but it is much shorter and much less stable than the Peak Design when fully extended. I don't tend to use it much because of its limitations, but my very light kit will work on it. Even though it is aluminum, I believe it weighs less than 2 lbs.
Go to
Dec 31, 2023 12:29:00   #
Even though I have an excellent Vanguard carbon fiber tripod and Vanguard head, it is too big, bulky, and heavy for me to travel with. I only use it very rarely these days. My tripod of choice is the very compact and light weight Peak Design carbon fiber travel tripod. Unfortunately it's also quite expensive

Over time my gear requirements have changed significantly and I've selected gear that specifically meets my photographic interests. My current camera is the small and light weight Nikon Z fc. I use prime lenses with it almost exclusively and the majority of them are very small manual focus lenses. I realized some time ago that the focal length of the overwhelming majority of the images I've captured were wider than longer and that fast wider angle prime lenses suited my photography goals.

This combination of a compact and lightweight camera, with compact and lightweight lenses, mounted on a compact and lightweight tripod is perfect for me and I am enjoying my photography much more than I have in the many years of lugging around large and heavy gear.
Go to
Dec 31, 2023 03:48:07   #
globetrekker wrote:
Not sure what's wrong with letting Lightroom delete files from the card?

I don't want to accumulate photos that I've already determined I don't want. So my process is to cull, develop, make final sections, and delete the rest.


As a general rule it is best to import all your files into Lightroom and then back them up before deleting them from your original source. It is the safest way to ensure you don't lose anything.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1066 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.