Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Samuraiz
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 113 next>>
Jul 26, 2014 11:01:00   #
bvm wrote:
DemocRATs, without a permit or license, are always shooting their mouth off.

Foot note:
A lot of misfires because they've always got their foot in their in their mouth or their head up their own or each others rear.


The right of Free speech "was" one of the greatest rights we "had" as Americans. We had the right to express our feelings and beliefs with impunity as long as our expressions were not slanderous or could be construed as a threat of harm to another.

Now the left has arbitrarily decided, and with the complete support of the President and AG that, "their rhetoric is the only rhetoric that can be spoken" Any rhetoric that disagrees with their rhetoric will be considered "bigoted, racist and hateful.

America has turned into the Soviet Union that we were taught about in the 60's.

Furthermore:


Go to
Jul 25, 2014 22:45:03   #
RixPix wrote:
You mention several issues...I wonder what percentage of each of these acts of violence include the use of firearms? Now that's a point to ponder.


The vast majority of domestic violence beat downs of woman and children do not involve fire arms. But you knew that Rix.
Go to
Jul 25, 2014 18:13:49   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
The Los Angeles Times is a typical MSM media which parrots the anti-gun propaganda. In an amazing example of blatant chutzpah, it also claims to be "impartial" in gun-related matters! Some years ago the Times ran a seminar to teach gun-ban organizations how to get their anti-gun propaganda most efficiently provided to the Times.


I'm not surprised.
Go to
Jul 25, 2014 17:42:54   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
UNREPORTED HISTORY: The Greatness of Guns

Posted on July 25, 2014
by Michael A. Cummings
Clash Daily Contributor

“[What has] been used to implement both the highest and basest goals of humanity – to put food on the table, to provide personal protection, to enforce or defy the law, to defend or acquire territory and treasure, and to liberate or to enslave.” ? (Source: http://www.nramuseum.org/gun-info-research/a-brief-history-of-firearms.aspx )

Guns, my fellow Americans. Precision engineering and fine art, harmonized as one to empower people around the world — even women.

Yes, Clashmates, I meant that last part for the Left. Tweaking them has become good fun.

A quick history:

The origin of gunpowder is unknown, and may have occurred in China, Turkey, or Europe. The first record describing the combination of charcoal, sulphur, and saltpeter, to produce a rapidly burning or exploding powder is a coded writing by Franciscan monk Roger Bacon shortly before 1250 A.D.
Within 50 years, early cannon had been developed. A large thick metal tube with one closed end (the breech) and an open end (the muzzle) was loaded first with gunpowder and then with a projectile. The powder was ignited with a torch or smoldering ember through a small hole in the rear (the touchhole). The rapidly expanding gases from the exploding gunpowder would throw the projectile from the barrel. This basic principle still applies today.
It took another half-century for this concept to be applied to individual hand-held weapons. The first firearms, ca. 1350, called “hand cannons” or “hand gonnes,” were essentially miniature cannons designed to be held by hand or attached to a pole for use by individual soldiers. They were loaded and fired in the same manner as the full-size cannons.
Seven hundred fifty-eight years later, outside Sadr City, Iraq, Navy SEAL Chris Kyle shot a .338 Lapua bullet (almost half an inch in diameter) out of his McMillan TAC-338 to make his longest shot, 2,100 yards. Almost a mile and half. That record shot saved an entire Army convoy from a rocket-propelled grenade.

What a glorious history. Despite the endurance of the basic science of firearms, we’ve come a long way. Rifling, powders, bullets, auto-loading, scopes, lasers, and so on. Imagine if we had no firearms. What we experience as reality today would be markedly different, and immeasurably more dangerous.

This is why the Left can’t stand firearms. They always hate what empowers the individual. It’s one of the pinnacles of hypocrisy because celebrities and those in government leadership positions have no objection to being protected by guns. But like the SUV which provides fun, function, and freedom, guns are fun, functional, and full of freedom.

Have you fired one? If not, do it. Find your local range here (http://wheretoshoot.org/Find_Range/). Shooting is a blast. Mrs. Cummings didn’t have much experience with guns before she qualified for her conceal carry permit. I wish you could have seen the look on her face shooting even a 22LR pistol, and doing very well at 25 yards (I think she beat me with my 9mm and 45 but let’s not get into that). Ear-to-ear grin, and a sense of power and accomplishment.

The Left claims a monopoly on empowering women but the only tools they clearly want women to have at their immediate disposal are taxpayer-supported contraception and abortions. If they truly wanted to empower women, they would support any and all education and training efforts. Not only would crime rates plummet against women, but you would silence the morons in government who have the unmitigated temerity to advise a woman to vomit, urinate and claim they are menstruating to avoid rape.

You didn’t hear that one? That’s your Democrat party.

Sadly, accidents happen with firearms, and people get hurt and die. Evil people with and without criminal records can and do get their hands on a gun and do harm to others. Since not a single law in this world will eliminate guns, why would anyone disarm ourselves?
The answer is we won’t, ever. In fact, we need more guns in the hands of more people. If good fences make good neighbors, good gun people make us into Mayberry.

Empower yourselves and your families by getting a gun. Get several if your budget allows. Learn how to use, maintain, and store them properly. And never let anyone tell you guns are bad, for as most Americans know: We can’t blame the spoon for making us fat.

Michael-Cummings1Michael A. Cummings has a Bachelors in Business Management from St. John’s University in Collegeville, MN, and a Masters in Rhetoric & Composition from Northern Arizona University. He has worked as a department store Loss Prevention Officer, bank auditor, textbook store manager, Chinese food delivery man, and technology salesman. Cummings wrote position pieces for the 2010 Trevor Drown for US Senate (AR) and 2012 Joe Coors for Congress (CO) campaigns. See more at www.cummingsamerica.com and https://twitter.com/cummingsamerica

Image: http://umfmarcy.wikispaces.com/American+Revolution+Tactics


Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/07/unreported-history-greatness-guns/#ycK3mBIE2gfTGchr.99
UNREPORTED HISTORY: The Greatness of Guns br br P... (show quote)




Thanks. however I think that your education will fall on deaf ears as it relates to the left.

Recently, I tried to watch MSNBC and when their constant audio and visual banner at every commercial break continuously promoted "Stop Gun Violence" for me this was just a bit slanted. After several days and I heard Stop Gun Violence" 100 times and never, ever heard "Stop domestic violence", "Stop violence against Woman", " Stop violence and exploitation of children" etc. I felt in my heart that they are just puppets without any real compassion and only serving their master's wishes.
Go to
Jul 25, 2014 17:35:58   #
gr8five wrote:
but i'm stuck trying to decide between Capture one Pro 7 and Lightroom 5. I have narrowed it down to these two. I shoot with a Nikon DSLR with 35mm, 10/24mm, and 18/270mm lenses. I have some blemishes on a few pics that I want to remove. Does anyone have experience removing blems with either of these programs? The backgrounds are not necessarily one solid color.


If you are not specifically looking for a raw editor or a catalog program then you may consider Photoshop elements or Corel Paintshop Pro X6 ( corel often offers deep discounts )wait for a 40% off promotion.
Go to
Jul 25, 2014 17:24:31   #
Or:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8219582047/raw-converter-showdown-capture-one-pro-7-dxo-optics-pro-8-and-lightroom-4
Go to
Jul 24, 2014 21:05:06   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
I once asked a leading expert on the Middle East (privately) "Is Obama a Muslim?" He hinted that he couldn't answer bluntly, but said, "The answer isn't that important. What matters is that he thinks, acts, and hates like a Muslim, and therefore should be regarded as a Muslim."


:thumbup:
Go to
Jul 14, 2014 23:18:33   #
Jakebrake wrote:
Eric Holder, the US attorney general, has accused some of the Obama administration's conservative opponents of being motivated by “racial animus”, suggesting that both he and President Obama are treated differently because they are black.


In unusually candid terms, Holder said that visceral criticism – including calls for impeachment of both the president and Holder, and Tea Party warnings about the direction of the country – were in part racially motivated. “There’s a certain level of vehemence, it seems to me, that's directed at me [and] directed at the president. You know, people talking about taking their country back.”

He added: “There's a certain racial component to this for some people. I don’t think this is the thing that is a main driver, but for some there's a racial animus.”

Holder made his comments in a wide-ranging interview with ABC News. Though he did not name any particular individual or group for such racially motivated hostility, he did talk about Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential candidate in 2008 and a Tea Party favourite, who has called for Obama to be impeached. “She wasn’t a particularly good vice-presidential candidate. She’s an even worse judge of who ought to be impeached and why,” he said.

In the course of more than five years in office, Obama has tried hard not to be sucked into the debate about any racial component of the opposition to his administration. When he has talked about racial issues, such as his remarks following the acquittal of George Zimmerman, accused of murdering a teenager in Florida last year, he has tended to talk in general terms about the impact of discrimination, rather than make specific allegations about his conservative enemies.

Other prominent African American politicians have been less reserved. Charlie Rangel, the long-standing Democratic Congress member for Harlem, recently said that the Republican stand-off with Obama was entirely motivated by race.

On Holder’s part, this is not the first time that he has allowed himself to comment on how America deals with its racial legacy. Just after he took over the job as the senior official at the department of justice in 2009, he made a much-discussed speech in which he said “though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards.”

Asked by ABC News whether he stood by that speech, he said he did. “I think we are still a nation that is too afraid to confront racial issues,” he said, adding that Americans rarely engaged “one another across the color line [to] talk about racial issues”.

The attorney general was outspoken in his condemnation of Republican-dominated legislatures that have passed new voter ID laws that have been decried as thinly-veiled attempts to restrict black voters’ access to the polls. The Department of Justice is currently suing Texas and North Carolina over their new voter ID legislation, and is expected to do the same in Ohio and Wisconsin.

“I'm attorney general of the United States. I will not stand for – I will not allow people to take away that which people gave their lives to give, and that is the ability for the American people to vote,” he said.

And once again the Administration and their sycophants play the race card. This is getting rather tedious!

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/13/eric-holder-racism-obama-administration-sarah-palin
Eric Holder, the US attorney general, has accused ... (show quote)


Yes I saw holder speak. It's amazing that he thinks that those that do not like his performance as AG ,is entirely because he's black. Can he explain why the same people think that Colin Powell did a great job?
Go to
Jul 13, 2014 15:26:07   #
dennis2146 wrote:
I don't think there any videos that show Zimmerman to be a bigot or rascist. After all he worked as a volunteer to help Black children among other things. As for the idiot, aren't we all idiots from time to time. His being an idiot had nothing to do with his defending himself against Trayvon Martin. If you remember back without drinking the Koolaid, you will see Martin attacked Zimmerman. Even if Zimmerman was following him that is no reason for Travon Martin to attack him. Also remember Travon Martin was shot while he was on top of Zimmerman punching him.

Apparently what you are saying is that NBC has the right to lie and show false narratives or videos about Zimmerman if it fits into their Leftist agenda.

Sorry, I don't think you get it. NBC lied yet the Liberals claim FOX News lies. Apparently you agree it is OK to lie as long as the lie fits in with what you already think. On that point, I have never heard one lie proven true about Fox News when they are giving news. Do their commentators say things to provoke feelings? Of course they do, the same as Bill Mahr, Piers Morgan and many others. Can you spell hypocrisy?

Dennis
I don't think there any videos that show Zimmerman... (show quote)



Very nicely put Dennis.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Jul 13, 2014 00:00:23   #
fbluhm wrote:
No. My argument all along has been... the very same people who are complaining about Obama, never complained about Bush when he was guilty of doing the same things; they simply complaining because a Democrat is in the White House. I, personally feel that the Bush administration did much more damage to this country and its reputation than Obama could ever dream of. I'm not in love with Obama. But saying he's a worse president than Bush is ridiculous. Statistically, even Reagan was worse than Obama has been.
No. My argument all along has been... the very sam... (show quote)


In all due respect. In my opinion this is purely a perception. It would be very difficult to find a group of conservatives in which at least 80% did not approve of the performance of George Bush. As I also mentioned in a previous post his entire last year had a Democrat ruled House with Nancy Pelosi as the speaker. I would ask her why she did not take this opportunity to bring charges.

As I also mentioned , If we can understand and accept that there are many that are vigorously seeking an overturn of the SCOUS decision with Hobby Lobby, then we must also accept that there are many that would like clarification about what is perceived as a cover up of the attack on the US embassy in Benghazi.

The US system is based on Justice for all, yes?
Go to
Jul 12, 2014 17:00:38   #
fbluhm wrote:
So what? That same mindset helped put Bush into office twice... or was it his brother and Justice Scalia during the Florida election, and the mysterious come from behind victory in Ohio that got Bush elected? Who knows. It's not the voters who put politicians into office anyway. It's like Mark Twain said: "If voting really made a difference, they wouldn't let us do it."


So at the very least you are saying that Obama and his people are dirty underhanded liars just like the Bushes. All we hear is that Bush did it too. So then Obama "at the very least" is no better than Bush. Is that what you are saying?
Go to
Jul 12, 2014 16:57:53   #
user47602 wrote:
No, I think we need to concentrate on the beating...

http://rackjite.com/wp-content/uploads/rr5914pp.jpg


What I am trying desperately to understand is that the Left has such a strong aversion to investigations like Lois Lerner when even a federal judge has got involved 100% in the IRS SCANDAL and a stronger aversion to turning over all the stones in Benghazi where folks want to know about the "stand down" order that resulted in the unnecessary loss of life. However they fully support a continued attack on Hobby Lobby because of 4 out of 20 forms of Birth Control that the employee has to now pay for. Funny thing is no Hobby Lobby has come forward and complained, While we still want Benghazi answered for.




You do know that it is completely possible that the Conservatives are taking a page from the Liberal page book. How many times were those that desired equal rights told that they were beating a dead horse. However they persevered and won.

Sing with me! "We shall over come", "We shall over come"
Go to
Jul 12, 2014 00:42:03   #
fbluhm wrote:
Who knows. But that shouldn't have kept the other side from stepping forward. I guess the rule of thumb is you don't call for investigation on your own guy.


Not quite correct in 2007 it was the 110th Congress and Nancy Pelosi and Democrat owned the house.

So the HOR had an entire year to act.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/110th_United_States_Congress
Go to
Jul 12, 2014 00:31:57   #
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/07/156367-outrageously-insane-feminist-expletive-filled-attack-prolife-advocate-caught-tape/
Go to
Jul 12, 2014 00:27:57   #
fbluhm wrote:
And, at the same time, there are also a lot of Americans who have had enough, and can see through the fog that hides the real purpose of these hearings. And I never said I was not interested; I asked why the concern now, when 60 people died on the previous watch and many of these same republicans didn't call for even one hearing or investigation. That's my point.

If that is true, why was there not a Democrat fueled investigation?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 113 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.