Thanks Gene51, Great images, I don't think I'd be happy with only 300mm reach, reckon I'm going to have to comprimise and look at the Tamron.
Gene51 wrote:
Doesn't work with a TC - sharpness is pretty bad at 300mm, it is F5.6 at 300, and to get usable sharpness you need to stop down to F8, so effectively you will be shooting at F11 and the quality will be pretty bad.
If you are set on using a TC, the 300 F2.8 will be a first choice, and if you use an F4 version, then at least your image quality will still be excellent. The 28-300 is an all-around superzoom that does nothing exceptional - ok for snapshots, but there are better lenses with less reach that are really pretty good. I have used 3 different copies, a friend's and two out of Nikon's NPS program - I am not a fan - though I had high hopes that it would be at least as good as my 18-200 was on my cropped cameras. It isn't even close. And it you are looking for quality at 300mm, then you should be looking elsewhere. If you don't mind buying used and third party, I am sure you can find a Sigma 100-300 F4, which does satisfy my quality standard, and can be found in great shape for $500-$600. I paid $550 for mine a year ago. Images taken with it rival my 600 F4, except for the bokeh, which can be a little "nervous" sometimes.
The first three attached images were all taken with the Sigma 100-300 and a D800 and cropped considerably.
The last one was with a 600mm F4
As you can see, the image quality is comparable.
Doesn't work with a TC - sharpness is pretty bad a... (
show quote)