Posts for: PrairieSeasons
Jun 28, 2016 10:02:26 #
mwalsh wrote:
I think you just inspired the solution....we should outlaw mass shootings!! And throw in terrorist acts as well.
Make America Great Again !!!
Make America Great Again !!!
But then only criminals will commit mass shootings and acts of terrorism.
Jun 28, 2016 08:56:15 #
Jun 27, 2016 08:49:33 #
[quote=Keenan]"...
Trump and the right wing nuts of the Attic are made for each other. A perfect match. It is not hard to understand from where someone like Trump draws his support.
Trump and the right wing nuts of the Attic may be made for each other; but Trump's real support is coming from the disaffected, and their numbers seem to be growing daily. Will and the rest of the increasingly irrelevant political elite will continue to publicly abandon Trump as their voice and influence diminish.
Trump and the right wing nuts of the Attic are made for each other. A perfect match. It is not hard to understand from where someone like Trump draws his support.
Trump and the right wing nuts of the Attic may be made for each other; but Trump's real support is coming from the disaffected, and their numbers seem to be growing daily. Will and the rest of the increasingly irrelevant political elite will continue to publicly abandon Trump as their voice and influence diminish.
Jun 26, 2016 11:50:21 #
That same Henry Paulson also advocates a g*******t policy which would inevitably continue the loss of US wages compared to the rest of the world. Anyone with that philosophy would support Hillary rather than Trump. The real question is how intense will the anti-establishment feeling be in November, not how the authoritarian government types feel.
Jun 25, 2016 11:50:17 #
kd7eir wrote:
Still too ignorant to understand that regulating guns is not the same as being against guns, I see. I'm an FFL holder since the days of Reagan, and I believe in regulating the sale of firearms. In fact, the words WELL REGULATED are part of the 2nd Amendment. If you try and insist that well regulated meant working properly back then, as opposed to it's meaning today, then we can presume that the 2nd Amendment only applies to firearms as they were known back then as well.
Maybe you'd get better responses if you tried enlightening other posters without the arrogant condescension.
Jun 23, 2016 18:57:11 #
bull drink water wrote:
from my standpoint you and your ilk live in a fog that's screwed up our country big time. i'm still not going to resort to name calling.
Except for the occasional "repuke"?
Jun 23, 2016 16:48:19 #
RixPix wrote:
"The Second Amendment has a preamble about th... (show quote)
That quote is from that right winger Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Maybe you can quote some of the other current and recent justices on this topic.
Jun 23, 2016 12:09:04 #
dljen wrote:
It is an act of civil disobedience, it's how our country progressed through the years. It's made the GOP look like petulant children, showing they don't stand up for the majority of the people in this country including sane gun users.
It's a matter of perspective as to which group looks like petulant children in this case.
Jun 21, 2016 22:39:18 #
pounder35 wrote:
If you don't read my posts then why do you judge me? I post on many threads and usually add links to back up my arguments. I don't give a s**t what you think about me. I'll sleep just fine. Just don't "assume" you know somebody's position on issues without doing some homework. I'll just leave it at that.
If I thought your posts were worth reading, I would certainly do so. As it is, I wouldn't have noticed your posts until you decided to respond to my question to Green.
Jun 21, 2016 22:27:43 #
pounder35 wrote:
Me a lib? You are way off. You obviously have never read any of my posts in The Attic. I'm as far from a liberal as you could ever imagine. 
No, I don't read your posts. I just assume that the i***ts who go for the ad hominem attack rather than facts and rational argument are libs.
Jun 21, 2016 21:41:25 #
pounder35 wrote:
img src="https://static.uglyhedgehog.com/images/s... (show quote)
No, it's libs like you who go for hominem attacks rather than facts.
Jun 21, 2016 21:13:17 #
pounder35 wrote:
Yes. You failed. Next question. 
bite my shiny metal ass, loser
Jun 21, 2016 21:02:40 #
green wrote:
which is worse? ...the person who posts the thread and ignores or the person who is ignored and whining about it in public?
Is this a quiz?
Jun 21, 2016 14:25:54 #
green wrote:
you passed up a chance to say "B-M-S-M-A" 
...don't waste double posts!
...don't waste double posts!Naah - I'm saving that for the coffee cup guy in the Orlando terrorist thread.
Jun 21, 2016 14:23:27 #
kd7eir wrote:
EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE NAMES I LISTED are conservative anti-government individuals that committed and/or planned acts of terrorism against the USA.
Stuff your IGNORANCE up your ass. I am not responsible for YOUR inability to accept the FACTS.
Stuff your IGNORANCE up your ass. I am not responsible for YOUR inability to accept the FACTS.
I don't recognize half of the names you posted, but will accept that they are likely all shooters/terrorists etc. because you posted them. The names I do recognize aren't conservatives - at least by any commonly accepted definition of that term. Some are w***e s*********ts, most are lone wolfs, some are rapists and some are neo-N**is. You seem to be foaming at the mouth and falling over backwards like John Cleese in a bad Monty Python movie trying to label them as conservatives. Maybe it's just myopia and maybe you're really a sick as you're trying to portray - I don't know.