The 'and' is kind of important here.
They haven't 'modified and reposted' it.
Without the reposting, the modifying is moot.

Interestingly enough, people at FYC have always asked for permission to repost my pictures showing suggested changes, even when I've asked in advance for suggestions. They are exceedingly polite.

Relevance? They haven't modified and reposted it.

I am a retired software developer.
I understand the Internet.
I also understand rules.

I live in the 'snowbelt' of Indiana.
Fortunately, the last few storms have gone south of us.
Unfortunately, jaymatt lives south of us.

So, your ethics say what you want to do is more important than what UHH rules allow you to do???

You'd have to post one here.

The other take-home lesson here is to delete file / reformat the card only after confirming that all files have indeed been moved.

In reading through this thread again, I noticed it is entirely about abuses of the "ignore" feature - nothing about good use of it .... primarily sidelining someone to keep him/her from pushing a thread off course and right into the Attic.

"Super Zoom" cameras present several challenges to manufacturers, the biggest being design of the lens; I keep hearing users like the Canon SX-50 better than the SX-60 ... I'm guessing lens design is the issue - and that sort of thing could happen to Nikon, especially if they rush it.

You have fewer options with JPEG, just as is true of slide film. I have successfully modified color levels with Kodachrome and I have have successfully modified color levels with JPEG, just as adjusting levels is one of the steps in processing images taken at the Olympics.

Most of the Nikon users who post here say the opposite .... in fact they consider the D750 to be a "high ISO monster". I believe DxOMark agrees with them - but I'll leave you guys to figure that out. As a Pentax user, I know that their latest cameras have the ISO range I want.

You may remove noise in PP, and may even "expand" color depth and dynamic range.

You will not stop motion in post - shutter speed does that.

Most likely, you will not change DOF much in post - aperture does that.

People are so hung up about the "exposure triangle" that they forget that shutter speed and aperture have another function. That is what I'm looking at.

My current interest in high ISO started when I noticed images that had much more DOF than I expected
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-380030-1.html

Part 2:

After dinner I did research on the Internet that would have been much more difficult in 1983. The Railroad Station Historical Society website {rrshs.org} attributes the Kokomo tower to the Lake Erie & Western {LE&W} railroad, and gives a construction date of approximately 1940; this information must have been vetted by someone, because they say this structure is now on the Historical Landmark Register. They attribute the Knox tower to the Nickel Plate {NKP} railroad, but give no date of construction. Doing further research, I discovered that the LE&W was purchased by the NKP in 1922, 18 years before the tower was constructed, so even if they were still running the LE&W as a subsidiary in 1940, the NKP was ultimately responsible for both structures {which would explain why they look so similar to each other}

Part 1:

Today was a lovely, though cool, spring day, so I took myself for a drive. While going through the tiny town of Knox, I saw the object in the first picture. This sort of thing is commonly called a 'gate tender shanty' ... before the advent of automation, this sort of structure would shelter the man who manually controlled the gates that stop traffic from crossing railroad tracks when a train was coming. This picture is SOOC - I may eventually decide to make small modifications ... for example, to increase contrast in the light areas so the individual boards stand out better.

When I got home, I went through my files, and found the second picture. It looks the same at first, but my wife and I played the comparison game and found three differences other than the windows {I'm willing to assume that windows in the one I saw today were replaced recently - but I do not honestly know that}

(1) the smoke jack in the top picture is right at the ridge-line of the roof, while the smoke jack in the second picture is slightly offset - thus the two jacks are of slightly different design.

(2) the one I saw today has some fancy wood-work under the windows; at the moment, I have no way of determining whether that was part of the original design, or whether it was 'cutified' {made cute} when put on display in the park.

(3) boards on the top one are placed vertically, while they were placed horizontally on the lower one.

So I decided the one I saw today is sufficiently different from the one I saw 35 years ago to get its own entry.

2018 - NKP Gate Tender Shanty in park, Knox IN

(Download)

1983 - LE&W Gate Tender Shanty in situ, Kokomo IN

(Download)

Why does this matter?

If I don't like it, I skip on to the next one and don't try it myself.