georgevedwards wrote:
This is getting interesting. I just switched to Nikon and have a D3200. I shoot Raw+Jpeg and both look the same when I open in Nikon's View NX2. In the two different above pictures, you mean they were taken during the same shutter snap? I can understand if you changed to Jpeg only there might be a difference. Another possibility is that on my Nikon there is a "Portrait" setting among several options in one of the menus: 'shooting menu' under 'picture control'; Portrait mode gives muted color, but good detail in the shadows for post processing; "Landscape" mode gives much more contrast and color. There is also a Neutral and Standard, Vivid and Monochrome in addition to Portrait and Landscape. And even as I type this I have discovered something else as I examine my camera: when I choose Portrait or Landscape, etc. mode and 'right click' on the circular pad with an 'OK' button in the middle, a new window pops up with adjustments for saturation, contrast, sharpening, hue and brightness, that I didn't know about. If your camera has this,( and I haven't heard it mentioned yet), it may offer more options to find the right tones for your washed out photos.
This is getting interesting. I just switched to Ni... (
show quote)
The Nikon D200 does not have a dial on top for these modes but I do have color saturation, sharpness and vividness settings. No matter how I set the camera up the JPEG ALWAYS looks better than the RAW file but Photoshop can easily make the RAW file look as good as the
JPEG and many times it comes out better. I guess this is the advantage of RAW.