Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: billnikon
Page: <<prev 1 ... 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 ... 1185 next>>
Oct 24, 2019 08:38:56   #
repleo wrote:
If I take a shot with my phone camera and process it on the phone with the Lightroom app, is it SOOC ? (Straight Out Of Camera). What if I use one of the Scene modes on my regular camera and the camera does the processing? My Sony has an app that allows me to set up three areas with different exposures and color temperatures in the same shot and blends them in-camera. Is that SOOC? Is it really any different to letting the camera process an Auto jpeg? What about in-camera lens correction or HDR?
Is letting some engineer in Japan determine how my image is supposed to look any more purist than me deciding how I want it to look?
If I take a shot with my phone camera and process ... (show quote)


Really? Sorry, this thread will do nothing to improve my knowledge and skill level. I will leave it to the uninformed to continue this tripe.
Go to
Oct 24, 2019 08:34:42   #
MrBob wrote:
This thought arose after reading a post on a user checking the LCD screen in bright light. Someone mentioned Chimping and I am just curious how many of you Chimp or not Chimp. Is there some sort of unwritten stigma attached to chimping that would flag you as a deplorable and not worthy of being recognized as a serious photographer or is it a useless endeavor that is just a waste of time ? Personally I like to Chimp and look at my capture; I make adjustments and move on. I fully understand the concept of " Getting it right the first time " and fully endorse that as it makes you a better photographer. Just curious as to WHY or WHY NOT you personally choose either approach. Maybe we can get a few humorous pages out of this.... Bob
This thought arose after reading a post on a user ... (show quote)


I always CHECK my exposures when my environment changes throughout my shooting sessions. It is not only logical but imperative to getting images correctly exposed. If time permits, why not?
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 17:27:13   #
aellman wrote:
Getting members to do that is about as easy as getting Putin to stop his meddling with our country.
This advice has been given here countless times, and it doesn't seem to affect posters one bit. >Alan.


Putin is doing nothing more than what we have been doing in other countries for years and years and years.
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 09:39:26   #
AndyH wrote:
But what about us old men who lust for older gear?


I know what YOUNG gear this old man could use.
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 09:34:16   #
Leo_B wrote:
Doesn't 300 x 1.4 = 420? Where are the other numbers coming from?


Crop factor for lenses on the D7000 is 1.5, so 300mm X 1.5 = 450mm X 1.4E II teleconverter (1.5 actual increase) (so +225mm) = total of 675mm.
Hope this helps
If you want to stay consistent, you could use the 1.4 on the teleconverter so, 450 X1.4 = 630mm or an angle of view of 630mm on the D7000 with the Nikon 300mm f4 lens with the Nikon TC 1.4E II or III teleconverter
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 09:10:30   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Seems people aren't accounting for the OP's budgetary concerns still by suggesting gear, that while great, is likely over their budget. What we need is for the OP to let us know their budget....


He has stated his budget, and I quote him here "Budgetary reasons have me considering a 300mm F4 Nikkor." So, his budget is $2000.00 because that is what the 300 f4 costs.
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 09:02:14   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
One point to note is that most all zooms fall short at the extremes of their ranges...Unless they are optimized for that and that usually means $$$$.


Have not noticed that on the Nikon 200-500. In fact, it really seems better at the 500mm extreme. And the 14-24 is sharp at all settings, same with the latest Nikon 70-200 2.8.
So, it appears that not all zooms fall short at the extremes of their ranges.
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 08:59:36   #
Overthehill1 wrote:
With the season for hummingbirds and butterflies around here over and flowers and fall colors fading I'll soon be looking for new subjects. I have been amazed at the many outstanding bird photos posted on this forum and would like to try my hand at it. I'm using a Nikon D7000 and my 80-200 F 2.8 with a 1.4X converter. That will probably handle most of the shots at the feeders we'll put up soon, but a few trips into the woods have me thinking I need more reach there. Budgetary reasons have me considering a 300mm F4 Nikkor. If my math is correct, that will give me the equivalent of 570mm at F 5.6. Or would I be better off with a manual focus older lens, like a 400mm. Thoughts?
With the season for hummingbirds and butterflies a... (show quote)


The 300 f4 is a great lens. I use it on a FF camera, but I have shot it off the D500. On the D500 that lens would have an angle of view of 450 mm f4 without the converter. If you put the 1.4 converter (something I do not like to do) your angle of view goes to 675 mm at f5.6 on the D7000. That should be more than enough for you. According to the Nikon charts, they they recommend the TC-14E II or TC-14E III version for that lens.
https://cdn-5.nikon-cdn.com/Assets/Common-Assets/Images/Teleconverter-Compatibility/EN_Comp_chart.html
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 08:46:02   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
If I was a betting man, I'd lay my money on mirrorless cameras being more susceptible to sensor dust ... The sensor is just there, waiting for whatever wants to jump / fall into the body when the lens is off. I struggled with an afternoon of cleaning spots yesterday in images from a Sony a7II. For whatever reason, Sony makes the shake process a manual action rather than auto when the camera is turned off or on, where I'd prefer auto for both.

I feared I'd have to get to a wet clean where I don't have full-sized wipes. I started with a sensor in this situation:



For the long pieces rather than circular spots, I could see these on the sensor with good light and a magnifying glass.

My first tool was a Giotto Rocket-Air and running the camera's sensor clean a few times.



The strips are gone. Maybe hair? I don't know what they are. The next tool is a Sensor Brush. It would seem this could add more than it removes. I blew the brush vigorously with the Rocket-Air, both to remove any dust in the brush as well as to build a static charge before touching the sensor.

Much improved, lots of spots gone, some new stuff arrived.



Another round of brushing and blowing and cleaning cycle and the final result after 20-minutes effort:



Good enough to get out and shoot and better, it seems, than the entire time I've had this body since purchasing used. Most of the images were f/16 at the nearest wall to my computer so I could click the SD card out quickly back n forth between the camera and computer / monitor.
If I was a betting man, I'd lay my money on mirror... (show quote)


What sensor brush do you use?
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 08:39:13   #
OneShotOne18 wrote:
OK, I'm way slow on learning. So, I need a relatively EASY but good photo editing software. Been looking at a few but just have cold feet to make a plunge into something I'm not sure about. Perhaps y'all can help. Has anyone used Topaz AI? Others - please....THX!!!


Elements is a good starting point. And, utube is full of good tutorials no matter what program you decide to go with.
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 08:37:19   #
bbradford wrote:
This may sound stupid as I am new to all of this. I have read and read about aperture settings but am still confused on one thing. If your lens says it has a maximum aperture of 5.5 how can the camera take it up to f.22? Is the lens really going to f.22 as the camera says or is max. at 5.5. Hope this doesn't sound to stupid but it's giving me a headache.


I call aperture a "Reversal Thing". What do I mean by that? Easy, under normal conditions you would think that the lens opens wider as the numbers get larger, right? WRONG.
For aperture settings, the larger the number, the smaller the opening. I know, it doesn't make sense. But, that is the way it is.
So, f5.5 is the largest opening for that particular lens, and F22, is the smallest opening for that lens. So, lots more light can enter your lens at f5.5 and a lot less light can enter into your lens at f.22.
Got it, GOOD. Knowledge is good grasshopper.
Go to
Oct 23, 2019 08:31:06   #
Paint By Light wrote:
Hello:
First off I am a (new) photographer. I bought my t7i about a year and a half or maybe 2 years ago now. I have a few good lenses now and also upgraded to a 7d mkII body and a few other semi-expensive "toys". I am doing all spending and my learning is ramping up but started off pretty slow however I know I can always do more :) but the problem lies I am not making a single dime from it. I guess I am worried i'm not good enough because of all the ignorance you read around social media sites when people ask for CC. It's rarely if ever useful it seems to me. You get a few "that's awesome-s" or "nice shots" but then again CC is I guess pretty vague. Plus it seems to me photography is more art than much anything else and I should be the main or only critic of my work perhaps. Then if you like ME then you can buy from ME or hire ME (??) Anyway I am interested in getting my work out there and scoping out options for a website. I have a FB page and sometimes wonder if that is all I need for now ?? But eventually I'll need a website I think. Long story longer lol what are your thoughts on starting off with this part or becoming a photographer 101? I don't want to spend a bunch of money on a lot of options I won't need for a long while (such as I sort of have already been doing with my equipment purchases HAHA) but maybe something semi-reliable. In searching i was thinking about the starter package on zenfolio ($5 a month)?? I read a lot of bad reviews about them though. Anything better out there I may not know about? WW You Do? Thanks for your thoughts... Jonathan aka Paint By Light Photography
Hello: br First off I am a (new) photographer. I b... (show quote)


Welcome. For me, it used to be a job. NOW, in retirement, I finally get to do what I love the most, wildlife photography.
Go to
Oct 22, 2019 16:56:49   #
bkyser wrote:
One thing to consider before pulling the trigger is to check the serial number closely, and see if it's been registered to that person, or maybe stolen???

Just because he said he bought it for a girlfriend to shoot weddings, then they broke up, doesn't mean that's what happened. I know of a person duped by someone, because he told her that he was a good Christian. I had to explain to her that a bad person, would lie about that, just like anything else.

Trust.... but verify. In God we trust, but all others pay cash... etc!
One thing to consider before pulling the trigger i... (show quote)


Please tell us how to match the serial number on a camera to a person. I have never been able to do that.
Go to
Oct 22, 2019 09:10:11   #
Bigmike1 wrote:
We’re talking about good olé days in photography, not everything else.


Who are you taking to Willis. Please use the quote reply in the future.
Go to
Oct 22, 2019 09:08:56   #
denis.fr wrote:
Bonjour, je vais au Carnaval depuis une quinzaine d'années, voici mes conseils:
1/ si possible, logez près de San Marco ou pont du Rialto, entre les deux est parfait.
2/ peu d'utilisation de longues focales, sauf du haut du Campanile ou de Dan Giorgio.
3/ pied pour photos de nuit
4/ beaucoup d'intérieurs avec des lumières diverses (attention à la balance des blancs)
5/ mon objectif favori : Nikon 24/70 2,8 ou Sigma Art 24/105 bien réglé il est top !
6/ J'ai acheté un 1.4 Sigma 20 mm l'an dernier pour limiter mes isos et augmenter ma dynamique : ce que j'ai gagné par rapport au 24/105, je l'ai perdu en recadrant assez sévèrement car l'angle de champ est vraiment large ! je ne fais que peu de paysages, plutôt des portraits et costumes + les canaux, églises, etc... et puis si mon 24 ne couvre pas le sujet, je fais l'assemblage de plusieurs photos avec Image Composite Editor qui est offert avec Windows 10 et qui fonctionne très bien.
7/ pour info, je tire environ 1300 photos lors du Carnaval, et je fais un tirage papier des 300 à 350 meilleures en 13x19 (pour bien en profiter), que je mets en album (fait chez un artisan Vénitien)
8/ etc... c'est le paradis des photographes, on se croisera peut-être au Florian, c'est le lieu de rencontre des costumés pour un chocolat chaud et le soir avant le départ pour les soirées...
Pour me reconnaître : Nikon D 850 et 24/105 sigma art, ou Z 6 ou 7 avec 24/70 2.8 S si mes finances me le permettent ! Amicalement, Denis
Bonjour, je vais au Carnaval depuis une quinzaine ... (show quote)


OH, where is my translator software when I need it.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 ... 1185 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.