Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dsmeltz
Page: <<prev 1 ... 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 ... 630 next>>
Sep 5, 2014 08:45:30   #
SharpShooter wrote:
NO camera is overkill for portraits.
SS


I tried this technique. I left my camera home and pushed the SD card in an available port (let's not go into too much detail on that). I would blink quickly when taking the portrait. I even used controlled substances to get a wider aperture (it also helped with the slot issue)! But, when I got home and put the card in my computer, all the files were missing.

SS, what did I do wrong?
Go to
Sep 4, 2014 14:08:56   #
kwbybee wrote:
Are the large files from 36 mp over kill for portrait work?


Depends if you are doing my portrait or my wife's.
Go to
Sep 4, 2014 14:06:59   #
You have to make adjustment so your screen and your printer match.

Two ways to go. One is more accurate than the other. One is less expensive.

1) By equipment that will do that for you. They make devices (like colormonki) you attach to your screen that measures what color is being produced and makes changes through your computer to adjust your display for accuracy.
2) Print something from your printer and play with your display until you think it matches.
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 13:43:50   #
Rongnongno wrote:
Explain that one, please.


I think it starts something like ...

"Oh Ye gods of color and gods of light bless this, your humble servant and his digital sensor...."
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 13:37:20   #
DavidPine wrote:
It might be of service, especially to new members, if the Photography Forum listed "All Sections" at the top of the list rather than the bottom. Even I keep missing some of them forums. What say you?


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 13:33:40   #
The drawback is the apeture. But for most wide angle shots that is not much of a draw back. Combined with the IS stop advantage, it almost makes no difference at all in actual use.

I got mine last week and love it so far, but I have only been playing around to this point.
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 13:20:51   #
jsmangis wrote:
At $27.5K, that's affordable?


I pay more than that to have my Lamborghini Veneno serviced!

... don't wake me up, please.

:wink:
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 13:17:43   #
If you decide to go with a wide-angle and are on a budget, the new Canon 10-18 @ only $299.00 is a very nice lens. I recently got it and have just started playing with it. Lots of fun. And it is built for an APS-C camera like your 70D.
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 13:05:53   #
MtnMan wrote:
I invite you to offer data of the quality of DXOMark. That would be of value.

Anecdotes are not of value. They are what supports false beliefs like Astrology. Nothing sarcastic in that factual statement.


A lot of magazines take new equipment out in the filed and tes...

Oh, forget it. You have made up your mind and just want to avoid all other input.
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 12:44:09   #
MtnMan wrote:
I did indeed equate your statements to Astrology.


And "input regarding behavior in the field" could be from simple anecdotes or from actual experiments or research conducted in the field.

YOU leapt to the assumption that I must be referring to anecdotes rather than actual experiments or research, therefore your sarcastic, antagonistic remark.
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 12:08:36   #
MtnMan wrote:
I didn't say any of those things.

I said I value test results over opinions. DXOMark is clear on what they include in their tests.

The dichomety you raise is false. Have you stopped beating your wife yet?


Stop being absurd of course you did. You attacked my simple statement that DXO was laboratory based with a sarchastic statement comparing my statement to Astrology.

dsmeltz wrote:

There is also the laboratory nature of DXO to consider. If you take all your photos in a studio under controlled conditions, then by all means rely on DXO. If you take shots out in the real world, you need more input regarding behavior in the field.


MtnMan wrote:
Ah, yes. You'll find many anecdotes as to how well Astrology worked as well. It is the common excuse used by those who don't understand.


Own up to your own words.
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 11:19:25   #
MtnMan wrote:
If you mean use data over belief, the answer is yes.

Subject movement matters and is not part of DXOMark testing and should be independent of lens. But once again the camera matters most because that is where the focusing system and shutter are.


OK so now your are basically saying that because DXO is objective on one level it is therefore objective on all levels????!!!!!! YOU MUST BE JOKING!

Lenses focus systems are different and they ARE NOT "independent of lens". The ability to lock focus varies. So either you are saying that DXO’s tests account for this because they account for other variables, or that it does not matter.

Or are you saying that a buyer should not care about the how quickly a lens focuses since DXO does not test for it?
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 11:11:39   #
John_F wrote:
I keep seeing articles talking about Four Thirds. Does this refer to sensor frame size ratio? Need specialty lenses to use effectively. How does it compare to the old film standard of 36 mm by 24 mm image size?


See the Olympus explanation at
http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/dslr_7045.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://web.archive.org/web/20110714235957/http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/dslr_7045.htm

Olympus wrote:
Four Thirds is a reference to the size of the image sensor. The image sensor for Four Thirds cameras is what is commonly referred to as a 4/3 type or 4/3 type sensor. These describe the type of sensor not the actual size of the light sensitive area, which is normally much smaller

The sensor measures approximately 22.3mm diagonally, not four-thirds of an inch, which would be about 33.87mm. Traditionally, the nominal size of image-sensing devices has been based on a method of calculation that was introduced when vacuum image-sensing tubes were first invented.

At the time, the outer diameter of these early 'vidicon' tubes was used to indicate their size. Unfortunately, this convention has remained despite the many advances in imaging technology that have since been made, and so the designation, "a four-thirds-inch sensor," can be a source of confusion. For this reason, many people now prefer to use the word "type" instead of "inch" when discussing the size of digital image sensors.
Four Thirds is a reference to the size of the imag... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 11:03:54   #
MtnMan wrote:
Ah, yes. You'll find many anecdotes as to how well Astrology worked as well. It is the common excuse used by those who don't understand.


You must use it often then.

Or do you think taking a picture of a moving live subject is the same as taking a shot of a stationary object?
Go to
Sep 3, 2014 10:43:22   #
sumo wrote:
I am a big fan of Riedel Glass...
I know a SA answer...but just couldn't help it


Totally appropriate. Always get the best glass for the job! :wink:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 ... 630 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.