Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: tdekany
Page: <<prev 1 ... 517 518 519 520
Dec 2, 2012 16:24:58   #
You can get this M4/3 UWA lens - no adapter needed

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8346/8232149942_dba8c6a23c.jpg
_B300006 by savingspaces33, on Flickr

The adapter is pretty cheap on ebay for om mount.

Cdouthitt wrote:
FYI, the Olympus 45mm f1.8 is a keeper. My next lens will be panasonic 20mm, 25mm or the new Olympus 17mm. I need to get an adapter to use my 7-14, 12-60, and 50-200.
Go to
Dec 2, 2012 16:01:04   #
Totally forgot about the 2 other new offerings from Olympus. The EPL5 and EPM2. Same price as the G5 or close to it, but they don't come with a viewfinder. However those 2 have the same sensor as the OM-D You can purchase a VF2 or VF3 as well.

DavidT wrote:
SirLan wrote:
Hi DavidT
Most micro 4/3 are bought for the same reason you mentioned and I think that the makers of all the 4/3 rd's should remember that when designing the newer models. That would help win more favour with DSLR owners, instead of competing with DSLR's make pocket rockets :) I also liked the Olympus OM-D E-M5. Love the retro shape too. Looks like my old Om10 slr. The only thing that put me off your new E-PL5 is the fixed screen on the back. Supposed to take excellent photo's which is the main thing in all camera's. Love to know how you get on with it and your view's on it when you get it. I am still really deciding which model to buy even though I have short listed to two, Panni G5 or Gh2(Not Gh3 unless it drops a little on price). I am open to finding out which is better before I buy one...lol
Hi DavidT br Most micro 4/3 are bought for the sam... (show quote)


The E-PL5 has a tilting screen. The E-PM3 does not.
quote=SirLan Hi DavidT br Most micro 4/3 are boug... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 2, 2012 15:29:36   #
Sirlan - If you can go for the OM-D or the new GH3, they both have Sony sensors and are as good as the APS-C DSLRs available.

Here is dpreviews conclusion of the OMD and the GH3 shouldn't fair any less. Hope this helps.


I am a zoom kind of guy, so for landscapes I'd suggest the 7-14 or the 12 as it was already suggested. Portrait, I'd say get the 60mm Macro, and kill 2 birds with one lens. Or the 75mm and the 60mm macro.

Good luck with your purchases. I love the format.


Quote:
The E-M5 sets a new benchmark for Micro Four Thirds images, thanks to a modern sensor and Olympus' excellent JPEG engine. It continues to produce good results in lower light than was previously practical and produces attractive output in all but the most challenging of situations. The combination of its small body and the small lenses available for it (specifically the Panasonic 20mm F1.7 and Olympus 45mm F1.8) mean it's a camera we found ourselves taking everywhere, without any concerns that we were having to make undue compromises on image quality.

The E-M5 can't completely overcome the light capture disadvantage brought by its smaller sensor, compared to APS-C, but it reduces it to the point that it's irrelevant for almost all practical purposes. At which point we think its size advantage, in terms of both body and lenses, will outweigh that difference for most uses. If you're absolutely unwilling to compromise on image quality then spending twice the money and moving up to the bulk of full-frame is the only way of gaining a significant step up from the E-M5.

This capability, combined with an increasingly useful range of comparatively affordable fast lenses (the largest of any mirrorless system), makes it easy to get good results from a variety of shooting situations, even when the light gets challenging. The camera's default noise reduction and sharpening settings aren't entirely to our taste but they're not overly destructive and are easily changed for the better. That minor gripe aside, we've been impressed with the E-M5's output, whether in Raw or JPEG.
The E-M5 sets a new benchmark for Micro Four Third... (show quote)


MT Shooter wrote:
I bought an Olympus 4/3's 2-lens DSLR system for the size and weight savings primarily. After viewing some 16x20 prints from it, I gave it to my 10 year old daughter, they just don't compare at all to the 16x20 prints from my Nikons, and that was when I was shooting the D7000.
Go to
Nov 19, 2012 15:28:42   #
To the top
Go to
Nov 15, 2012 11:47:09   #
Price reduced
Go to
Nov 13, 2012 23:07:54   #
Seanfitz0 wrote:
Yes it's a fine lens as you were on eBay you saw the average selling price yourself naturally your link is to the highest some go for as little as $35 average is 179.88 look up last 30 sales


Are you bidding on the lens or just being helpful?
Go to
Nov 13, 2012 22:12:11   #
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Tokina-AT-X-90mm-f2-5-Macro-for-Nikon-Excellent-/281012510131?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item416da69db3

Thank you for your kind wishes.

My ad says or best offer. The lens is tip top.

What is your exact offer?

Thanks

Seanfitz0 wrote:
The average for this lens sold on eBay is a minimum of $100 less than your asking price and sometimes up to $250 less but good luck with your sale
Go to
Nov 12, 2012 21:10:41   #
This lens is in excellent condition as far as I can tell. Nikon AI mount. The lens is very sharp with beautiful bokeh.

Asking price is $395 or best offer. Shipping is $10.00 for fast USPS priority shipping.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask.










Go to
Nov 12, 2012 20:58:55   #
Also look on mu-43.com
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 517 518 519 520
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.