Retired CPO wrote:
No, the current administration has not "gutted" the endangered species act. Some Grizzly populations have grown to the point that they no longer need as stringent protection as they once did. How many remote desert areas that very few people will ever visit need to be kept off limits when National security matters dictate that resource exploration in a safe and sane manner should be allowed. How many salmon fisheries should be kept in a "pristine condition" when gold mines can, "hopefully" be operated in a safe and sane manner and protect the salmon and allow gold extraction at the same time?
I'm a wildlife and landscape photographer. I love these places as much as anyone. But a balance has to be struck between living in the real world and protecting and nurturing the places we all love. Very nice photos of very important species in very important places.
No, the current administration has not "gutte... (
show quote)
As was pointed out by sb, the changes will have nothing to do with reducing protections on the grizzly, alligator or any other species that have shown that recovery is occurring or has occurred. Remember, the bald eagle, a species that primarily generated the passage of ESA was recovered AND de-listed in 2007 under the existing Act. The current changes allow those with wealth and political clout to determine the application and enforcement of species protection. It provides that economic costs to be a primary factor to determine protection as the federal government weighs protecting a species, whether currently listed or not. Such a change would allow the logging industry with its money and lobbyists to push to block protections for a forest-dwelling animal on economic grounds; the oil and gas industry to block protections on species affected by the increase in exploration and production through political means and inaccurate economic projections.
True, the Act has its faults and the environmental community has in some cases overplayed their hand using it for other purposes than simply species protection but, all-in-all it has worked in many cases. The recovery of the grizzly in the Yellowstone ecosystem (that you apparently refer to) is a good example. In the early 1980s, when I was a member of the Border Grizzly Technical Committee, the grizzly population there was significantly less than 200. Today there are over 600. There are currently 312 wild California condors and a total population of 488. There was less than 50 when I was on the Recovery Team in 1980; and there are now over 3,000 sea otters on the California coast, up from the remaining 50 found in the 1930’s.
As the effects of global warming continue to alter environments, more and more protection of wildlife species world-wide will be necessary. This is not a time to reduce elements of an act that has been successful in so many cases. You might check out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNrg4tXPWCA
Into the 2nd half. I hope everyone sees how important these refuges are, especially since the current administration has just gutted the Endangered Species Act.
Hooded merganser
Peregrine falcon
European wigeon
Song sparrow
Green heron
Snow goose
Burrowing owl
Green-winged teal
Western grebe
Eared grebe
#3 in a series of 6. Responses on the past series discussed NWR policies regarding access for photography. As I have been photographing in these areas for the past three decades there has never been a time when it was allowed to be pedestrian access except on designated walking trails (which most have). All have auto tour routes and along them specific areas where you can stop and get out to stretch. Recently a number of refuges have installed very nice photo blinds that are available by drawing prior to the winter season. ALL of my images were either taken from my vehicle or from within these blinds.
Belted kingfisher
Red-winged blackbird
American wigeon
Sora rail
Killdeer
Northern shoveler
Tundra swan
Tree swallow
Common goldeneye
Snowy egret
rich1hart wrote:
Good set, downloads would be nice.
RE. Downloading
I don’t sell my images. If someone wants one I’m more than happy to provide a JPG file to them at their request, just send me an e-mail. But, after noting one of my wapiti images on a sweatshirt a tourist in Yellowstone was wearing several years ago (he said he paid $35 for it) I’ve since been a bit cautious about just opening the door to easy access (I didn’t even get a credit line on the shirt). Probably with all the ways to copy images now I should just quit worrying.
Moving along with more of the rich birdlife of California's National Wildlife Refuges
Bufflehead
American coot
Great blue heron
Black phoebe
Double-crested cormrant
Yellow-billed magpie
White pelican
Pied-billed grebe
Barn swallow
Common merganser
Predominantly managed for wetlands and waterfowl values, the National Wildlife Refuge system has 32 refuges in California. Many of these are within the Central Valley and were less than an hour from where I lived for the past 18 years. These areas are rich in wildlife species and I visited them regularly in my photography efforts. So many species, so many images, I’ll cover them in six posts over the next week or two. Here is the first:
Northern Pintail
Blue-winged teal
American avocet
Great egret
Ruddy duck
Black-crowned night heron
Canada goose
Wood duck
Yellow-headed blackbird
Lesser scaup
prg wrote:
Lovely. I have a question. Did you use a flash???
No flash. I rarely use it and then only for shots of owls at night. I had been getting poor DOF results plus not stopping movement so I upped my ISO to 1600 and shot this at f8 at 1/400.
Moving from Paradise where after 20 years I had an established cadre of birds using my feeders, things here on the northcoast have been slow. After 4 months I finally have a few using the feeders, especially a family of chickadees that show no fear of my presence. Here's an image I took yesterday.
eagle80 wrote:
Did you go on a photo tour?
Yes, with Tropical Birding.
All I can say is THANK YOU to all for the encouraging comments and support. Now I have an answer when my wife asks me, "So what are you going to do with all those photographs?"
Red-headed barbet (female)
Blacvk flowerpiercer
Black-cheeked woodpecker
White-winged brush finch
Speckled whitestart
Stout-billed cincloides
Black-collared jay
Cinnamon flycatcher
Slaty-backed chat-tyrant
Moustached antpitta
Retired CPO wrote:
Really nice! Do you use guides or go it alone?
I'm too old, too tired to go it alone anymore. Guides/photo tours take the pressure off of transportation, accommodations and meals so the focus is on the photography.
Moving from Central to South America along the Pacific Coast into Ecuador. Due to it's being bisected by the Andes Mountains one could surmise the word "flat" wasn't invented when Ecuador was assembled. But, that makes for a very diverse birdlife. In addition to the hummingbirds (published earlier) here are some of the other birds:
Pale-billed acari
Red-headed barbet
Torrent duck
Masked flower-piercer
Chestnut-collared sparrow
Toucan barbet
Carnaculated caracara
Crimson-rumped toucanette
Yellow-breasted antpitta
Masked trogon
Wish I could come across a deal like this for my grand-daughter. Your lighthouse is outstanding.