You could also set up a free account in Dropbox. Useful for many things besides photos

Thanks BigD for setting the record straight! (at least for those who are open to your ideas). I challenge anyone to tell the difference between a fine shot with a "quality" filter in front to keep that 2-3 thousand dollar lens protected and without the filter. in my book if you have the extra money to burn, shoot with the "naked" lens and take your lumps in a while when you have to replace the lens instead of the "quality" filter!

The question you always have to ask is, "what am I supposed to be looking at?" My eye keeps seeing the tree trunk in the middle, then the branches to the left, then . . . it just keeps wondering around the picture, never really stopping any place. The leaves are nice and a close-er up of the leaves maybe -- I think the center tree is distracting. Splits the photo in half. If you've ever read about the "rule of thirds," you might want to see if you can add that to your "bag of tricks" in composition. Keep shooting!

Maybe a reflector would have been better than the flash. The flash can be a little "harsh"

I would concure with sinatreman about the sky being blown out. The bright white sky detracts you're eye from focusing on the statue

Great pictures-- wondering if a little hair light would give some definition to their hair. The heads seem to merge into the background