Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Clarence
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Nov 12, 2011 10:22:18   #
cmhjohn wrote:
Here is my entry - picture taken at a slackline competition


What's with the finger?
Go to
Nov 10, 2011 21:12:23   #
I like #1 best. Great photography.
Go to
Nov 10, 2011 20:39:59   #
Good photos. I enjoyed them so much I forgot to look for things to critique! So I guess there was nothing that jumps out at the viewer.
Go to
Oct 24, 2011 17:34:50   #
Many wild animals will allow you to take their photo in fun situations if you are calm, patient, do nothing to scare them and try to give them a treat for posing. One must be ready for the unexpected. Keep up the good work.
Go to
Oct 24, 2011 17:29:38   #
tiger1640 wrote:
You need to convert the WMV file into and AVI file. Depending on your friends DVD player it should play.


Thank you for commenting on this. I use Windows Movie Maker extensively and find that even though the dvd works in most dvd players, there are some that it does not work with. I was told that it is because of the age of the player. I will experiment with the WMV and AVI files and see what happens. Thanks again.
Go to
Oct 21, 2011 13:54:01   #
PhotoArtsLA: I really like the work on your photo. Great effect! Thanks for showing it.
Go to
Oct 12, 2011 14:43:56   #
Sounds Great! I would like to learn how to do that. The couple of times I tried were a disaster and I would love to learn from the pros! Thanks
Go to
Oct 11, 2011 14:53:36   #
If you were shooting roll film, you can try scanning them to digital on your computer then try color correction. I have had considerable good luck scanning many of my old photos and doing this.
Go to
Oct 5, 2011 03:32:06   #
Great color and subject matter. I feel like I am standing in the water with the shore line so high in the photo. Keep up the good work.
So that is what the business end of a bee looks like!
Go to
Oct 5, 2011 03:27:47   #
I did not know Utah had trees!
I enjoyed your photos. Very nice.
Go to
Oct 5, 2011 03:24:24   #
Timarron wrote:
Greetings all! As my first post, I wanted to put up these pictures from a 2011 Fireworks show on the Oregon Coast. I set up the camera on a tripod with an intervalometer set to take 4 second time lapse every 12 seconds. Then I just sat back and hoped I got lucky. The silhouettes are my parents and some of their friends in lawn chairs. I really like that they showed up in the exposures. Of course, any suggestions for improvement are welcome.


My first thought when I read the title was, 'four seconds! a little long!' BUT when I saw your photos I thought "Great Shots!" I think you did some really good shooting and I hope to see more of your work soon. Thanks for sharing.
Go to
Oct 5, 2011 03:08:08   #
great shots, I really like them.
Go to
Oct 5, 2011 03:05:37   #
Frank S wrote:
I'm new to digital photography, but thanks to this forum I'm learning.

While attempting to get a photo of this Civil War canon firing the muzzle flash is just so over exposed that it's washed out of any detail. What camera settings would you suggest to correct on this? Any suggestions would be appreciated.

The attached photo is the original, un-retouched (don't have any photo editing software, yet). It was taken with a Nikon D90 & a Nikkor AF-S 70-300mm VR F/4.5-5.6 G lens. Handheld, 85mm, ISO 200, 1/500s, F/8.
I'm new to digital photography, but thanks to this... (show quote)


Not bad, the blast can be doctored, too bad those cars are in the background also the neatly mowed grass.
Go to
Oct 1, 2011 22:45:03   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Read this post on this forum:

http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-3790-1.html


Thanks, this clears it up for me.
Go to
Sep 30, 2011 21:05:20   #
joec wrote:
The terminology can be confusing (partially due to manufacturers who use macro on their lenses that are not truly macro.) Macro means that it can render an image at life-size on the film or sensor (or more than life size.) Magnifications are expressed as a multiplication factor (1/2 or .5 X would be half life-size (a one-inch object in real life would be on the sensor or film as 1/2 inch before any enlargement for screen or printer. 2 x would be twice life size.) They can also be expressed as ratios 1:1 = life size, 1:5 = 1/5 or .2 X, 3:1 = three times life size.) What most mfg call macro, Nikon calls Micro, for some reason. Some third party lenses will label Macro a lens that can only go to 1/6 - 1/2 life size. Sorry if I'm rambling, but hopefully it'll make some of the articles easier to understand. (Don't even ask about microphotography or photomicrography--or do if you're really interested.)
The terminology can be confusing (partially due to... (show quote)


Thanks, I think you just answered my question before I even posted it. I was going to ask what the difference is between Macro and Micro. I have heard both terms for years and knew the meaning, but did not know the difference.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.