Stephan G wrote:
Without making it sound like a pun, there is a difference between the types of photographs. It is what intent the focus is placed. The similarity is in the processing of the image. That is the same whether you are doing Still Life, Architectural, Glamor, Nudes, Street, and so on....photography. It is in the result where the distinctions arise.
Street photography does have a cousin in stagecraft. More precisely, "Staging" or "Blocking". We try to work the environs to move the eye to the "subject". It is done by vignetting a story. Every bit of photography rules are applied, and even broken, to have the 'subject' of the story to be limned.
In my high school English class, I had a teacher who would assign us books to read. The school provided the paperbacks. He would place them on our desks just prior the class arrival. When we got seated, we were required to read the first two paragraphs in the book. The rest of the period, we had to write what the rest of the book was about. After a while, it was awesome as to how close we would get. The point is that if are observant, we pick up a lot more clues than we might think.
My personal difficulty is that there too many stories going on when I am shooting on the street.
Without making it sound like a pun, there is a dif... (
show quote)
Wonderful, except this article also does not support what you previously stated, and tends to suggest you may not understand Street Photography.
"Shooting on the street" is not what produces Street Photography, at least not if by "street" you mean a road.
Notice how BW is more common than color, and that is no accident. In Street shots we hardly ever see a detailed view of a person's face and often see obscured profiles or just a person's back side. Again, not an accident.
Those objects just are not the subject.
It is exactly the opposite effect of the staging you described.