Shot and manipulated on the iPhone
Thanks all. I am going to go with number 2. Good insight from everyone. Nice being able to throw out a photo question and not receive mean criticism. Constructive criticism is what this site is about.
Regardless of whether or not you like these photos, if you had to pick one over the other for a wall print, which would you pick? (These are copies of copies of screenshots of screenshots.) Thanks much. I really appreciate your input.
It was just before kickoff
What can I say. I like over cooked. Iphone shot at Woodstock Vermont during the Super Bowl
Right out of the iPhone 6. Shots from my daughters rooftop in Brooklyn.
All things considered not very bad. The original was a fully exposed outdoor photo.
My grandson and my dog are often palling around together and they were both looking out the window waiting for my daughter-in-law to come home. Quick shot with an iPhone and it is really over cooked, overprocessed over everythingâs but itâs still representative of the moment. An overprocessed photo is better than no photo.
I may have posted this earlier. iPhone photo, a bit overcooked but I like it.
Go with the highest ISO you need to get the shutter speed you need with the aperture wide open. No high school basketball player, in the history of the sport ever said, "boy I wish it was blurrier without as much noise". NO ONE WILL CARE ABOUT THE NOISE, ESPECIALLY ON SCREEN. They will love the sharp photo and could care less about the technical aspects. If you are shooting for "Sports Illustrated", different story. If you are shooting for your daughter and family and friends just crank up the iso and get the shot.
A year old but not a lot changes
Otesaga Hotel, Cooperstown, NY
Sorry for the second posting. I think the last one was too large, 11 mb.
Check out this video. It's worth the few minutes watching it
https://youtu.be/dNVtMmLlnoE
Murphy the dog playing "Sorry". He's not as good as he thinks he is.
Great photo. I have never gone birding and I think I need some longer lenses but I would like to get into it. Question though, if I might. Why do you shoot it at f10, 1/400 and ISO 500. What would be wrong with F5 .6 or F8 and a faster shutter speed or a lower ISO? At that distance is depth of field a concern? Though I don't see how it could've gotten it much better