TriX wrote:
Problem not solved, despite all the rhetoric, Macs are also vulnerable to viruses, malware, ransomware, etc. The primary reason you and others believe they’re invulnerable is because they’re such a small percentage of computers in service compared to windows platforms, that they’re not targeted as often. The fact is that Windows Defender is quite competent IF you keep it updated, and all those warning you were getting was Defender doing its job. Most compromised computers are in fact caused by operator error and poor computing practices such as opening infected attachments, single factor authentication and compromised passwords, and a Mac isn’t going to save you from that.
There was a time in the early days of Windows that an external AV application such as Norton was good practice, but those days are over - Windows now includes most of the tools that 3rd party SW used to provide. While there are useful utilities, Norton is serious bloatware. It’s too big, too expensive, has too many extra components (more $), uses too many resources, interferes with too many applications, is very difficult to remove (by design) and unnecessary. Running Norton on every machine is a habit left over from the last century and past it’s value.
For all the bitching about Windows, the fact is that if you have decent computing skills, install Windows correctly, keep it updated, and don’t bog it down with crap like Norton, and keep multiple copies of your data, you’ll encounter very few if any compute problems. Windows 10 runs perfectly on all my machines, I have never had an update issue and have NEVER had a virus or malware attack and I’ve been running Windows since the beginning - a good 30 years. If you prefer the Mac platform/OS, then God bless and carry on, but don’t present it as the answer to everything bad that happens in the compute world or every dumb thing the operator does.
End of rant.
Problem not solved, despite all the rhetoric, Macs... (
show quote)
TriX, well, you bring out some good points. I really need to re-assess this whole problem. I am glad you posted this post as I need to look at this problem in a different light if that is the right word.