Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Jim Bob
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 721 next>>
Mar 6, 2018 10:07:11   #
Gianfranco47 wrote:
this is a nice squirrel eating in front of my kitchen , photo is taken behind the glass the window with my Nikkor 80/400 camera D700


Gallery.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 10:05:25   #
cameraf4 wrote:
A few years back I planned a trip to do the Great Southwest, you know the place. Never been there. Always wanted to go. A week before we were to fly out, my MIL who lives with us fell and broke her pelvis. Insert long, hard-luck story here. We couldn't go. (She's OK now, BTW)

Has taken us all this time to get it together for another try, same trip (Zion, Bryce, Capitol Reef, Arches, Monument Valley, Page, Grand Canyon). All reservations made. All "I"s dotted, "T"s crossed. Scheduled to fly out early tomorrow. Now a big-ass storm (snow, wind, rain, yadda, yadda) is forecast to start tonight with major airport disruptions at Philly Airport tomorrow. Airline has already sent me e-mail warning that flight may be cancelled.

I know that you folks don't really know me but is the Cosmos trying to tell me to just "Punt" this trip idea? I mean, seriously!!
A few years back I planned a trip to do the Great ... (show quote)


What does this have to do with photography?
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 09:27:14   #
Psdunner wrote:
Thank you for your informative sarcastic answer.


Happy to oblige.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 09:24:46   #
Tracht3 wrote:
It's the 70-200 2.8 vr2 my best telephoto zoom and tack clean https://1drv.ms/f/s!Agtyc8xm6pDT73WNmyLg606bfNyM here are some samples. Love love love this lens. A workhorse and if you add a 14 tele you have your additional length.


I don't believe that is the lens the OP is inquiring about.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 09:21:10   #
tredway wrote:
Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 E FL ED VR


In terms of image quality there is really no comparison here. The 70-200E is really without peer in this range for image AND build quality. However, there are some very comprehensive reviews indicating the Tamron 70-200 G2 may be as sharp. And it costs a LOT less. Only you can determine if it..."is worth the switch". You realize, of course, that comparing the two lenses you mention is not an apple to apple comparison.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 09:18:10   #
Psdunner wrote:
Sorry Jim, didn't understand the reply. Is that requesting a gallery of images?


No. There is a photo gallery on this site designed for submitting photos...imagine that.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 09:17:02   #
PeggySue58 wrote:
Glad to give you something to grump about Jim Bob! How boring it would be if when we bought new stuff we didn’t post it! Hope you have a great day!


You call that a "grump"? What would you call this: Nobody wants to hear about your conspicuous consumption and braggadocio. Guess that would be a compliment.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 09:12:44   #
tredway wrote:
I have D7200/28-300 lense.not happy with sharpness of photos. Considering 70-200 (2.8) would it be worth the switch??


Which 70-200?
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 09:11:36   #
Booker wrote:
I don't think you're whining at all; simply gathering info prior to making a major cost decision. I use both Nikon & Tamron lenses of various focal lengths, but if I were doing commercial work, I'd stick with Nikon. Remember, you will have the lens a long time.


"So, I'm still torn. The price difference is quite significant. What to do? One thing the Nikon has above the Tamron is the resale value, but I don't ever plan to sell it."

You call that "...simply gathering info...". Geesus. Amazing what some of you posters will think and say...or at least say. Thought might not be a part of the equation.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 09:07:02   #
Psdunner wrote:
I dropped of the radar here for a while but decided to come back and post some of my works.Decided to start with something non-controversial, North Korea (:=)). Was there a few years back and am getting some material ready for a talk, so I will be posting some from time to time. This is Paekdusan, an extinct volcano/caldera on the north on the Chinese border. It is sacred to all Koreans, north and south.


Gallery.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 07:38:48   #
PeggySue58 wrote:
And will soon be the proud owner of the Nikon 85mm 1.8 G lens and a Yongnuo YN685 speedlight for my D7200. Was looking at the Nikon SB 700, but the Yongnuo was 1/3 of the price of the Nikon. Hoping I made good choices! Can’t wait to see that Adorama box!!


OK. Thanks for letting us know that you bought new stuff. Absolutely titillating.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 07:36:34   #
jackm1943 wrote:
I'd like to share something with you that really made my day yesterday. I've mentioned before on UHH that my granddaughter is studying photography and that I had given her my old E3 Rolleiflex 2.8 Planar and other stuff. Yesterday she sent me this text: "I'm at a photo conference in Philly called SPE and I've been wearing your rollei all around. Everyone's so in love with it - lol - and it's been an easy way to start conversations and get a bunch of free stuff, so thank you."'

I reminded her that it is now her camera, not mine, and that most "old timers" would recognize it. She went on to say: "Yeah and even young kids are all into it and have asked questions about it. I tell everyone how it was yours and how it's my baby now. Also, the dudes at Ilford gave me 11 rolls of free film and Kodak gave me one as well so that was really cool of them."

She is very creative and has made some very nice images with this old camera.

Proud Grandpa.
I'd like to share something with you that really m... (show quote)

Isn't this a thread for the attic?
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 07:33:09   #
rmm0605 wrote:
We planted these azaleas four years ago and, now, they are rewarding us with nice Spring blooms.


Gallery.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 07:32:27   #
BIGRO wrote:
Shooting retirement party this Wednesday in a hall sort of dimly lit at times.. 40 people minimum so will be group shots. Thinking about using 24-70 on tripod for group shots and 70-200 handheld for everything else. Canon, both L lens. Question is, is a expensive diffuser worth it or should I go with el cheapo. Please give recommendations so I can shoot down to B&H. Not doing a DIY as it looks tacky. Bouncing the flash might still give me harsh lighting. Before I get the impatient short comments, I looked into the search portion and reviewed numerous vids on the tube, techradar, etc... first paying gig so please be helpful or refrain from commenting. Much appreciated
Shooting retirement party this Wednesday in a hall... (show quote)


Skip the 70-200. You don't mention whether the camera is full frame or crop sensor. Might make a difference with a group of 40 or more.
Go to
Mar 6, 2018 07:28:11   #
Ji Li wrote:
Thank you (everyone) for the comments and feedback. I definitely need the F2.8 since my primary purpose will be to take real estate pictures for realtors, although I definitely intend to use the lens for architectural and landscape photography as well as night time photography.

Looking at the DP Review of the Nikon 14-24 vs Tamron 15-30 shows the Tamron as the "clearer" choice. However, reading the Ken Rockwell review, he seems to like the Nikon 14-24 F2.8 as the most clear of any ultra-wide angle lens he has ever shot and he is well respected for his reviews of lenses. So, I'm still torn. The price difference is quite significant. What to do? One thing the Nikon has above the Tamron is the resale value, but I don't ever plan to sell it.

Ref: https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4651324149/tamron-15-30-f2-8-vs-nikon-14-24-f2-8-shootout

Ref: http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/14-24mm.htm
Thank you (everyone) for the comments and feedback... (show quote)

Stop whining. Get the Tamron and save money without compromising performance.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 721 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.