amehta wrote:
Yes, the 1DX suggestion was somewhat in jest. There are reasons to move up from one camera in a line to something several steps up, but I would not say that buffer speed should be one of them, unless you are doing it professionally. Since you know the activity, you can use that to make better shots. Instead of firing continuously, you could watch the movement and take a shot when the moment is right. Then the buffer isn't an issue, but shutter lag definitely is.
If you find that the T3i is getting in the way, the 70D would be a good next step, skipping the T5i. This has excellent AF tracking to keep up with moving subjects. But if you haven't used the best possible technique with the T3i, the results won't be much better with the 70D, especially for action shots. But if you can get the full potential of the equipment, the dancers will love your photos. :-)
Yes, the 1DX suggestion was somewhat in jest. The... (
show quote)
Actually, the dancers do love the photos (but they don't see even half of them!). I am more critical because I know I have so so much to learn. I don't do continuous shots very often--the lights are dimmed and the light distracts many. In exhibitions yes (with judgement), as the lights are up. Lighting is really the problem for me with the dance photos, and when I can formulate the questions I will pose them. I know I have NOT found the best possible techniques with this 3ti yet, but am glad to have the suggestion of 70D. It is hard to find an environment like the dance venue in which to practice. I agree with your point of making the buffer a deciding factor. I am guessing 70D's is faster though. Will check. Thank you so much!!