Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: nikonkelly
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12 next>>
Jan 29, 2018 22:05:38   #
Ariel wrote:
I don't believe anyone one here is demeaned concerning their work ,values etc .


Ariel, you win. I am just an old idiot. I am very sorry for wasting everyone's time trying to explain to you what is so obnoxious in your tone... have fun, I am out of here.
Go to
Jan 29, 2018 15:42:36   #
You know, it is a very funny thing here Ariel, no one is talking about agreeing on everything... just being nice about things when we discuss them. What would be so hard as to speak nicely? that is all that I am saying... maybe that is just too much for a web based group that does not have to face each other, but I sure hope that it is not.
Go to
Jan 29, 2018 10:51:31   #
Rab-Eye wrote:
On the last supermoon of 2017, I dropped my D500 on concrete, although I suppose that has nothing to do with this post, other than now that I have it back, I really want to nail some images of the upcoming supermoon, so I have done some practicing. These were shot with my D300s, but I do not see any way that would be causing my problems.

I want images that show detail in the supermoon and also some foreground detail. Without the foreground, you have no perspective showing the special look of the supermoon.

Please take the following into account:
1. These were shot at ISO 1600 and ISO 800. I will use a lower ISO for the actual event, but I was shooting handheld in these practice shotes, and I d not think my issues were caused by the high ISO settings, because I never maxed out my shutter speed.

2. These images are not sharp. I will be using a tripod for the actual supermoon.

3. These are raw images, but I did not process them at all. I only exported them to JPEG to post here.

My problem is any image with even a trace of foreground has the moon blown out, and anything that shows any detail in the moon is otherwise black. How can I achieve my goal of getting the detail in the moon without losing all of the foreground? I would greatly appreciate advice!

So here is what I have:
On the last supermoon of 2017, I dropped my D500 o... (show quote)




Please remember that the moon is 100% reflected light from the sun... so it is approximately 50% as bright as the sun. So the Moony 11 rule is a very good starting point... F11, ISO 100 and 1/100th second as a starting point. when you set your ISO to 800 of 1600, you are actually blowing out your shot. If you use your meter it will see all of the black in the view finder and average that into the calculation... and it will always blow out your image... just try the above settings and you will be within 1 stop at most from a great image.
Kelly
Go to
Jan 29, 2018 10:10:45   #
then let me reword my statement... When you crush the egg, then you have a bunch of shells in your now useless egg. Look, the entire point is this is... dont start arguments at every opportunity. most of us can be very civil... a few have to spoil a good thing for others. Please dont spoil what could be a great group... for others as not everyone wants a fight.
Go to
Jan 28, 2018 23:58:05   #
Thank you Dossile.
Go to
Jan 28, 2018 23:56:13   #
But if you crush the egg, then you have a bunch of shells in your now useless omelette.
Go to
Jan 28, 2018 20:54:52   #
Ariel wrote:
I have not found anyone one to be arrogant without cause but have found many to be ignorant to the history of photography and
art in general . But perhaps this is the place for many to exchange not ideas but prejudices . Like a chicken coop , they
get all loud and excited when disturbed then settle down to the usual mundane once the threat of an idea has passed .


As I read the OP, this is the exact type of comment that they were speaking to... it starts like this and then blows up in our faces. For many years now, we have been a society of "man are they nuts..." and then we lambaste them with both barrels of a double barrel shotgun. This is place where we are to be always right... but rather always civil. And if we cant be civil, then maybe we are in the wrong place. We are all guilty of being rude at some point, but let us apologize, and then move on rather than ignoring our mistakes and and continuing to belittle others. Just my unpopular take on a group that has to seemingly always be right. Now go ahead and be head me... I am asking for it from anyone who thinks that I am wrong... not right... but wrong.
Go to
Jan 28, 2018 18:36:04   #
Larryshuman wrote:
We were there Jan 18 thru Jan 21.


Thank you Larry, we were supposed to go then but had issues with the weather and could not make it... I am afraid that it is too late now to go.
Kelly
Go to
Jan 28, 2018 08:59:36   #
Nicely done Larry, when were you there?
Go to
Jan 28, 2018 08:57:08   #
wkocken wrote:
We will be taking a tour for 7 days in Costa Rica. Sights include River boat ride and the cloud forest. I will be bringing my Canon 7d Mark 2 and a 15-85 lens as my primary lens. I need to pick one additional lens. Either a 70-300 f4-.6 zoom or a 90mm f2.8 macro. I enjoy shooting landscape as well as wildlife the most but still enjoy taking some flower photos. Which lens shall I choose?


having been to CR a few years ago, I would without hesitation take my longest lens as the wildlife is everywhere especially since you have the wide side already covered.
Go to
Jan 27, 2018 09:43:39   #
very well said! I left UHH for a couple of years because I was fed up over the fighting... I was just about to leave again and then I saw this. maybe there is hope yet.
Go to
Jan 25, 2018 13:14:14   #
mas24 wrote:
Your quote. "The D850 was a piece of crap, until it went back." Your story is interesting. I've heard of photographers sending back lenses, as many as two times, until they got the one that satisfied them. You had the patience to send your D850 back, until it came back right. Here's hoping your experience is quite minimal. $3300 is a lot of money for a body only camera. Perhaps Nikon's QC was an issue on your camera. Hopefully, not many others, except for a future firmware fix for all D850s, to correct any other upcoming problems. Enjoy your D850.
Your quote. "The D850 was a piece of crap, un... (show quote)


As I was going through my ordeal and even now with a friend, I only know of three cameras that exhibit issues of this sort... on the other hand, I dont know everyone who got a D850 so there are some cameras that have had some issues, but it seems to be very limited from what I hear... those who have problems are likely to let others know so... since we have not heard much, it has to be limited.
Go to
Jan 25, 2018 08:08:27   #
GalaxyCat wrote:
I don't want the D850 any more because I've read that there is too much noise. Maybe the pixels are just too many, or too small so that the limit of the technology is reached in this design. Plus, the camera has to be even more sensitive to vibration/shake/etc... due to the smaller pixels, which is required if the sensor is the same size as other dslrs, which is the 35mm size.

Comments?


I will come at this in a different way. I bought my D850 on the second of November and was pleased as plum when I got it... only to discover about 3 days later that it would not follow birds in flight... I set it up just as my D500 and it still was not right, I played with it for 5000 shots... and I took it back to get my money back... it was a no go. They told me that they found nothing wrong with it, to which I said bull crap. So I got got it on my tripod, and I shot moving cars (grills) yes a hard subject, but then so are birds, and after about 100 shots with it I called Nikon. They asked for three images, and I did not hand pick them, rather I sent 3 consecutive images. upon taking a look at the first image the Nikon Person said... Send it in, there is something wrong with your camera. I sent it in on Wednesday, had it back the next Wednesday. I went out and shot moving cars with it ten minutes after I got it back. Lo and behold, they were sharp and less noise than I had seen in any image in the past.

Sure there was a problem. The D850 was a piece of crap... until it went back in. true, QC should have caught it, but they did not. A dear friend of mine is to get her D850 back from Nikon tomorrow for very similar issues. I expect it to be fixed as well. But out of the thousands of D850's out there... only a couple have had issues... and they are correctable... that does not sound like there is too much noise. I think that you need to read and look at the images that are out there and really judge for yourself rather than letting someone else tell you what you need or dont need. and if you cant afford it... by all means... dont buy it. get something else or use what you have... just dont be a nay sayer because someone else's best friend's third cousin thought that it was not good.
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 19:06:13   #
you are very welcome, just sorry that roberts was out of stock.
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 09:42:59   #
I have ordered 1 xqd card three separate times from Roberts in indianapolis indiana and have gotten each about two days later... they have always been in stock. the one' that i have ordered are the Lexar 128 2933 speed and these have all been ordered since thanksgiving (usa). ask for Ed and he will help you out.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.