Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bangee5
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 957 next>>
Feb 25, 2016 07:38:21   #
dirtpusher wrote:
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/02/24/obama-outsmarting-republicans-winning-supreme-court-nominee-fight.html


Oh, politicususa.com. Never mind...
Go to
Feb 25, 2016 07:35:35   #
dirtpusher wrote:
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/24/obama-weighs-republican-for-us-supreme-court.html


Republican is not the same as a conservative just as being a Democrat is not the same as being a liberal. We need a Conservative Justice.
Go to
Feb 25, 2016 07:16:04   #
Keenan wrote:
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

OK, Bangee, wh**ever. Problem is you haven't shown the least bit of familiarity with the concept of "reasoning" from what I've seen so far. You cling to a several thousand year old superstitious invisible man in the sky religion, remember? Beyond that silliness, if you think that rejecting grade school level scientific literacy in order to stubbornly cling to your right wing partison ideological lunacy of denying the entire science of c*****e c****e makes you one to even attempt to have any credibility on the issue of who is or is not reasonable, then you a walking joke.

Thanks for playing. Bye now...
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: br br OK,... (show quote)


How old are you Keenan? Point proven.


cli·mate.


[&#712;kl&#299;mit]

NOUN

1.the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period:

C*****e c****e is the change in the weather Patten.
Go to
Feb 25, 2016 07:07:46   #
slocumeddie wrote:
`


Wow! Eddie. You sure got Rac with that 1.2% remark. I mean, who can argue with that kind of low intelligent argument. 1.2% says it all.
Go to
Feb 25, 2016 07:03:34   #
Keenan wrote:
Oops! Sounds like someone has poopy diapers again. Now Skylane baby, go on back over to the playpen and leave us grownups alone! I'll send an assistant over there to change your diaper for you. Run along, now!


Grownups? Keenan, you do not sound like a grownup... grownups don't depend on insults and innuendoes. No one can even reason with you except your fellow socialist.
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 23:33:04   #
thom w wrote:
OK, I wasn't saying he's a better christian than you are. How would I know that. He seems like he is at least as serious about you are. He seems like someone who doesn't compromise but I have never seen him get personal here. He doesn't seem offended that some (probably many) don't agree with him. He certainly gives his opinion and frequently gives the verse it comes from, But I haven't seen him dwell on religion when no one is asking. I would have no idea if he is a better christian than you and I really wouldn't know what that means. Republican has nothing to do with religion (well, OK some sure seem to think so) Either you read it weird or I may not have used punctuation properly. I'm a lot more interested in what Republicans think than I am about what religious people think. I've had a pretty poor impression of Republicans for a while now. I was hoping Republicans (and people who think Republicans are liberal.) on this site would change that some. Actually what I've seen here so far is rather frightening.
I wasn't trying to dis you or bangee or a couple of others here. I'm thinking my first post offended you. It wasn't intended to.
OK, I wasn't saying he's a better christian than y... (show quote)


Thom, I wasn't asking if you thought that Steve40 was a better person or Christian then me. As a Christian it does not work that way. There is no competition between Christians. At least, there should not be. Why should there be. We are each of the same body, each given different gifts for different jobs through the same Spirit. We all have our own lives to live but the life we live, we live for Christ.

Did you notice the topic of this thread. This is not my thread but I do have a right to speak my mind on the topic.

I am not offended if someone does not agree with me. Are you offended when others do not agree with you? Have I insult you in any way? What does offend me is when some jerk comes along who does not know the Bible, who h**es Jesus, curses God and blasphemy the Holy Spirit with some off the wall slurred such a Mary the mother of Jesus was raped by alien spirit... such a person deserves to go to hell. If that offends you, then judge me as you will. I am sure that Steve40 also agrees with me even though he will not say so openly. I respect Steve40's opinions and his thoughtful replies but, I am not Steve40. I am not SteveR or Pepper.

And, you have not offended me by any your post. When you do, I will let you know.
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 18:02:40   #
Keenan wrote:
But hey, at least you are an improvement from Banjee, in that you are at least talking about the climate. Banjee just wants to talk about the weather
:roll: :roll: :roll:


And how YOU can do nothing about it... just talk. Talk about pollution... you can do nothing about it... just talk. Talk about the sea levels.... nothing you can do about it... just talk. Carbon monoxide, the only thing you can do is to stop driving and start walking... not going to do that either... just talk.
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 17:33:21   #
thom w wrote:
If they weren't kept for sex why were only virgin girls allowed to live?


1. for s***es, a custom every where practised in former times, as to captives.

2. or handmaids, for marriage with such was not forbidden.

3. they had done no wrong themselves so why k**l them.

As a man, to ask such a question, if you had the opportunity is that what you would do, take young virgin girls for sex s***es? Of course not. If a Jew, and Hebrew Israelite you would raise them as such, Jewish - Hebrew - Israelites.

Adam Clarke's Commentary

Numbers 31:17

K**l every male among the little ones—For this action I account simply on the principle that God, who is the author and supporter of life, has a right to dispose of it when and how he thinks proper; and the Judge of all the earth can do nothing but what is right. Of the women k**led on this occasion it may be safely said, their lives were forfeited by their personal t***sgressions; and yet even in this case there can be little doubt that God showed mercy to their souls. The little ones were safely lodged; they were taken to heaven and saved from the evil to come.
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 16:37:21   #
thom w wrote:
I'm not in a position to say it is or isn't wrong. I know that your back and forth has history behind it. Having said that I would hope to not put things that way but I don't always live up to my expectations. I h**e to see anything here get personal but most things seem to. I started out reading and posting here with the hope of learning about people with views different than my own. I don't think I've learned much. I've learned that some people are so angry that logic totally eludes them. I've learned that some people are just here to stir up s**t. I hope I don't know anymore about the average Republican than before I came here as I really wish to believe that much of what I see here is total aberration. If I felt I could prove that Christianity is based on fact or prove that it isn't I would post such proof here but that isn't going to happen and if such proof did exist many here would still refuse to believe it no matter which the proof proved. I do think Christians shouldn't just throw out things based on there belief as fact and expect that persons who do not share their beliefs should accept it as fact. I think of Christians here Steve40 is the one I most respect. He sounds like an ornery old cuss and I'd bet growing up in his house was no picnic but I know just where he stands and he doesn't get personal (that I have seen) and he doesn't take it personal that I don't believe as he does.
I'm not in a position to say it is or isn't wrong.... (show quote)


When you compare one Christian against another, what do you base your comparison on? You mention 'Republican'. What does a Republican have to do with religion?
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 16:35:01   #
thom w wrote:
They were called Plymouth Brethren. They said that was just because for tax purposes they had to be something. There was no pastor. There was no Church membership. The ones I was associated with were called Bible Chapel or Gospel Chapel. If you wanted to break bread with them you had to talk with a couple of elders who would decide if you could or not. If you came from somewhere else you should have a letter of introduction from your assembly. There were no musical instruments during the worship service. They called themselves meeting as the saints did during the first century. If you had divorced and remarried after being saved you would not break bread with them. If it occurred before you were saved they were OK with it. I could go on if you wish but I doubt if you do.
They were called Plymouth Brethren. They said that... (show quote)


Please, I would like to know more? When did you break away from this religion and why not sooner? And no, it is not at all like the Baptist.
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 15:59:08   #
thom w wrote:
I was given my own New Testament for memorizing the twenty third psalm at about age three and it just got worse from there. Where I went to Church they believe a lot like Baptists but feel Baptists are way too liberal. You won't see a woman without her head covered at the worship service (you may call it communion). Women do not pray in front of men or teach men. I was named after a tract writer (Tom M. Olsen) whom my parents new quite well. The Bible was a major part of our daily life. I'd have to guess that at one time I probably knew the bible quite a bit better than you do. I'm not so up on it now as I have spent a lot of time on things I consider more important.
I was given my own New Testament for memorizing th... (show quote)


What type religion were you brought up in? As for me, I had to seek God on my own. My parents did not talk about religion in our home.
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 15:57:00   #
thom w wrote:
Why are no Christians commenting on the original post quoting the bible concerning having sex with female children as long as they were spoils of war?


Here Thom... for your eyes only, an explanation on the original post.

Numbers 31:12-18 (NKJV)
12 Then they brought the captives, the booty, and the spoil to Moses, to Eleazar the priest, and to the congregation of the children of Israel, to the camp in the plains of Moab by the Jordan, across from Jericho.
13 And Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the congregation, went to meet them outside the camp.
14 But Moses was angry with the officers of the army, with the captains over thousands and captains over hundreds, who had come from the battle.
15 And Moses said to them: "Have you kept all the women alive?
16 Look, these women caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to trespass against the LORD in the incident of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD.

17 Now therefore, k**l every male among the little ones, and k**l every woman who has known a man intimately.
18 But keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not known a man intimately.

Bible Knowledge Commentary

31:13-18. When Moses met the returning army he was angry when he saw the Midianite survivors. The Midianite women, he said, should have died because they were directly culpable in Israel's sin at Baal of Peor. All the women except the virgins were then sentenced to death along with all the boys. This insured the extermination of the Midianites and thus prevented them from ever again seducing Israel to sin. Reference to Midianites in later history (e.g., Judges 6:1-6) no doubt implies either a different clan or family from those in Numbers or the possibility that some escaped God's vengeance. The virgins were spared because they obviously had had no role in the Baal of Peor incident nor could they by themselves perpetuate the Midianite peoples. Nonetheless, strict application of the rules of holy war dictated that they too should have been k**led (Deut. 20:16), so it was only a concession by Moses that allowed them to live.

Matthew Henry Concise

Those Slain Who Caused Sin (31:13-18)

The sword of war should spare women and children; but the sword of justice should know no distinction, but that of guilty or not guilty. This war was the execution of a righteous sentence upon a guilty nation, in which the women were the worst criminals. The female children were spared, who, being brought up among the Israelites, would not tempt them to idolatry. The whole history shows the h**efulness of sin, and the guilt of tempting others; it teaches us to avoid all occasions of evil, and to give no quarter to inward lusts. The women and children were not kept for sinful purposes, but for s***es, a custom every where practised in former times, as to captives. In the course of providence, when famine and plagues visit a nation for sin, children suffer in the common calamity. In this case parents are punished in their children; and for children dying before actual sin, full provision is made as to their eternal happiness, by the mercy of God in Christ.
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 15:30:01   #
thom w wrote:
I probably will. I'm sure I have before (I've read the whole book more than once but it's been about 100 years ago". What you just stated sounded a lot like what James said. I actually get a bit tired of all the Religious arguing here from both sides. Sometimes you state things that I fell I have to comment on. I'm sure I don't have to but it's hard to fight the feeling.


If you feel that you must comment on things that I have said then please do... just make sure that I am the one who said it.
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 15:27:38   #
thom w wrote:
I believe that were the story true the power ine******y is such that informed consent could not have been given.


Mary was no stranger to God or the Scripture. She consented so as to please God whom she also worshipped. God did not just pick anyone to be the mother of Jesus. She had to be in the family of King David to fulfill prophecy that Jesus would be born of a virgin. David had also prophesied that the one to come (Jesus) would sat on his throne forever.

Tell me Thom, how much do you know about the Bible?
Go to
Feb 24, 2016 15:13:42   #
thom w wrote:
Why are no Christians commenting on the original post quoting the bible concerning having sex with female children as long as they were spoils of war?


Because it did not happen. If you knew Old Testament Laws and the attitude of the Jews toward their enemies and why God had ordered all pagans k**led, saved the young virgins, then you would have a better understanding. As it is, you rather listen to the wisdom of a fool who likes to twist Bible scripture to suit his own twisted mind. Read it for yourself from the Bible.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 957 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.