Nothing experience won't cure. You'll do fine.
Eventually, you'll move on and just think about the creative aspects because you'll feel so comfortable with the technical aspects.
Do what works for you. Get another instructor.
a6000 is incredible for the price even if the price was four times as much.
I went back and viewed the link.
This issues is about a "oath" in the fashion industry dealing with body image.
The entire industry needs to change. This has been an issue for a long time and every now and then someone writes about it. Unfortunately, almost nothing has changed.
As a photojournalist, it's unethical for me to photoshop. But when I'm doing my own personal photography, that's a different matter. If I'm doing it as "art" then the skies the limit. If I'm doing a wedding or an event for someone then I'll with do some limited touchups for the client.
The bottom line is that there is no perfect camera. If you like the camera, then use it. I get tired of all of the equipment wars.
Those wonderful supermarket magazines come under news and editorial content. So you can take a picture of a celebrity and sell it to your favorite publication.
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
Profoundly wrong.
celebrities are public figures. However, if you try to use their image for commercial use you can be in probably will be soon.
It depends. There are situations where you could clearly sued and when in their situations or you cannot.
If use for editorial content or art you don't need a release. However if the picture ends up in a commercial endeavor like an advertisement that's a different issue.
PalePictures wrote:
Yes,
I have sold my street portraits commercially. I have been asked for a release when selling my images.
500px requested a copy of the release for several images I have sold there.
Several images were sold in the U.K. commercially where a release was requested.
I have sold many where a release was not requested.
If I was not selling a facial image I would not get a release.
Taking what I call snapshots on the street(Street photography) I would not feel the need to have a release.
Yes, br I have sold my street portraits commercia... (
show quote)
Also, you can't necessarily photograph in any public place. If it's private property they can set the rules. In a public area like streets, you are fine because it's not public property. If you are going to sell photographs it would be wise to get model releases, as well as, property releases if the property is recognizable or has been trademarked. Additionally, you may run into problems if there is a product or poster advertising a brand in the background. For your own private use, you should be ok. But, once again, they may depend on the law of the country you are in.
Could always print your best pictures.
As a journalist you have to be careful in situations like that. If the police are arresting people they are not going to ask for ID. To be safe you need to stand outside the police lines. If you're inside the police lines you're subject to arrest. Then you have to plead your case in front of a judge. In fact, even if you're too close to either side of a police line you could be arrested. That's because police don't know who you are and what your intention is. You could be coming up from their backside to attack them. Also, you have a ton of people who are self-proclaimed journalists. But, like I said, the courts you going to have to figure out what your intent was and why you were there.
Many of these people were anarchists who seize any opportunity for violence. They don't like any type of government and have been known to do similar things in other cities.