Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: GPappy
Page: <<prev 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 next>>
Sep 2, 2012 15:29:00   #
Well for me I scanned them all and had to back and really look at 3, 4 and 6. IMHA 3 is not quite sharp enough and the bugs in 6 pushed me away from that one. So I would say 4.
Go to
Sep 1, 2012 12:08:36   #
Personally I would crop out a little more of the sky. Otherwise I like it. Very nice.
Go to
Sep 1, 2012 11:00:12   #
OnDSnap wrote:
If I recall correctly, we used to do a similar process many, many moons ago, soaking the print in a solution of (can't remember) and the image would actually separate from the paper backing, similar to a decal...we would then remove the paper from under the film image and slide a wood plaque under the image, lift the plaque once positioned to your liking, let dry, then it was coated with a clear coat product we used for protecting pencil or pastel drawings or just clear varnish.


Oh wow I remember doing that similar technique with some custom paint jobs on m/c tanks and fenders. I coated the photo or picture from a magazine with a clear medium from the craft store. Several coats were needed to get it built up. Then soaked in water and removed the paper backing. Then laid the remaining "decal" on the tank or fender while a fresh coat clear was still tacky. Then sprayed on several coats of clear until the surface was smooth. It worked great and I know a couple are still around. This was all done about 40 years ago.
Go to
Aug 31, 2012 08:39:51   #
Camper or RV = caravan
and one that still gets me is....
Pissed = drunk
Go to
Aug 31, 2012 08:12:50   #
Go to Serif.com, they also have some good free dowloadable software for pano and post processing.
Go to
Aug 31, 2012 08:02:24   #
It helped me to understand wb by playing around with the custom setting and using different colors for the setting. Take a shot of something that completely fills the frame. Use white, grey, yellow, green whatever color that strikes your fancy. Use that shot and tell the camera "this is white". Then take a shot of anything. Look at the differences it makes. You will be amazed at how it effects the outcome. Just remember to clear the settings when your finished.
Go to
Aug 27, 2012 12:19:09   #
I ran into this link and thought some of you would enjoy looking at these high quality large format shots.

http://pavel-kosenko.livejournal.com/303194.html?thread=22669914
Go to
Aug 21, 2012 10:08:56   #
Well I think you made one hell of a good purchase. You now have the upper hand for trades and resell. Blands and their potential quality are top of line.
Go to
Aug 19, 2012 15:24:10   #
I always wondered about stacking multipliers/converters. Now I know. They look fine to me. I was afraid of vignetting at edges and corners. Thanks and nice job!
Go to
Aug 19, 2012 15:10:03   #
Actually IMHO, both are OK as long as the size is not increased, with #2 being the easier to see in lower light viewing. But neither are acceptable if blown up much at all. This may be from my screen resolution but I see a lot of what I call, digitation confusion, all over them both.
Go to
Aug 19, 2012 10:44:26   #
buckwheat wrote:
I occasionally need some help and I think once I might have given some. My problem is that unless it says Canon or Lightroom I'm too curious to NOT open it. Then I find myself reading a bunch of stuff I'm not interested in, but keep reading anyway. Its a character defect. If the title says Nikon or Photoshop, I'm all over it.


Buckwheat what is that camper mounted on? I used to see a lot of old Caddy hearses converted to campers but that one ain't no Caddilac!
Yeah I also would like to see a little more description but i stll click on them as am wanting to increase my internal memory banks as much info as possible. I have always been one of the curious.
Go to
Aug 19, 2012 10:30:45   #
Those photos are simply fabulous! I have never seen Senior photos of that caliber in any yearbooks. Cliff you are, without a doubt, a real pro! I would certainly be self serving and probably tacky if I was this good.

I love this sight. The stuff you can learn here is amazing to me and I have held a camera in my hands for over 40 years and will always be an amature no matter how good I get.

I also wonder why most the goofy nasty comments seem to be "poeple in hiding?"
Go to
Aug 18, 2012 14:48:40   #
tilde531 wrote:
Gracious!
I didn't know ANYone saw this, actually!! LOL

And I didn't think it'd be such a mystery to the well-experienced among you, either.

I'm working backwards here... as my experience with film and developing film... is extremely limited. So I'm using a digital camera and learning all kinds of fun tricks.

This shot is NOT my original idea... it is actually Ian's.
The composition is mine... the sad result is mine as well.


This is pretty neat... and pretty simple... but still not quite the success I had in mind... so there's more experimenting ahead.

My first attempt with this, had me in tears and belly-aching to Ian about how I "can't" do it... felt like such a failure. But he let me act like the baby and asked me to try again... and this was the result!

It went similarly when he was teaching me night-photography and long exposure ... which this is not, nor is it double exposure for those of you who have guessed that.


This taught me more than how to create a specific effect, though.

It's taught me that, when I think I can't, that should be my signal to try one more time.

And when I think I've got it... it should STILL be the signal to try one more time... taking things one creative step further.

Thanks for the interest and comments, everyone.
I'll share the "HOW" a bit later...
Gracious! br I didn't know ANYone saw this, actual... (show quote)



EXACTLY!! Digital is a whole new adventure over film in a lot of ways. Finding panography, HDR, IR and now you have enlightened us in another direction. Keep it up!
Go to
Aug 18, 2012 11:47:04   #
ianhargraves1066 wrote:
GPappy wrote:
I used to do this with film. Mostly did it looking through an open door. Set up on tripod, snap a shot, cock the camera without advancing the film and not moving camera, then take another shot with the door closed. Viola ghostly pics. You could see everything on the other side of the doorway wth the door being transparent.
And no I haven't figured out (yet) how to do digitally to get what I want.


Ha ha you went to the same school as me! The problem as moct ftil cameras got more complex was the you could not cock the shutter manually, as you wound on the film you cocked the shutter. Mamiyaflex's and Exactas you could do it. Hasselblads you took the magazine off the back, and wound on, replaced the back and away you went .

Ian
quote=GPappy I used to do this with film. Mostly ... (show quote)


I had an old cheap Petri that was all manual with an internal light meter. When I installed the film I would make sure the film was pretty "tight" inside the camera. After I took the first shot, I would press the button to allow the film to be re-wound back into the cassette, then I would re-cock the shutter. This would hold the film in place and not advance it, and would reset the shutter for another exposure on top of the original. You just had to be careful and have the film tight enough not to move around or you would get a lot of fuzzy looking pics. It worked great , I wish I still had that old piece of crap camera.
Go to
Aug 18, 2012 10:56:57   #
Oh I didn't say WAY COOL! Nice job.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.