Posts for: skylane5sp
Apr 15, 2016 16:36:16 #
dirtpusher wrote:
how much you buy a week or month :?: :?: :?: :?:
One gram of "Bubba Kush" since the first of the year. And I still have almost half of that. At 30.5% THC you don't need much. I keep my consumption low because of my job. I'm subject to DOT random testing.
But when I re-tire in a few years I kin git jus as stoopid as YOU!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :oops: :oops: :oops:
Apr 15, 2016 16:25:40 #
I'm not in any "dead cold panic" (wh**ever that's supposed to mean). I have two. One for up close and personal and one to reach out and touch someone. I don't carry. I'm not scared. I AM proficient and if someday SHTF, I'll be able to protect me and mine. What's your point?
"Crackpot jack whistles"? Civil discourse? Have I called you any names? Yet?
Oh, and BTW, the only thing that's picked MY pocket lately is Obamacare.
"Crackpot jack whistles"? Civil discourse? Have I called you any names? Yet?
Oh, and BTW, the only thing that's picked MY pocket lately is Obamacare.
Apr 15, 2016 15:21:23 #
DaveO wrote:
Maybe he's smelling the smoke from some home grown. Getting to him.... :lol: :lol: :roll: :roll:
Don't have to home grow here. It's legal... and there's lots of quality control.
Apr 15, 2016 13:36:04 #
dirtpusher wrote:
would i do that. but then better than getting the ole rudolf nose like yuh'all carrying around, sniffing out next beer hall. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
And now you're making s**t up. Nothing wrong with my facial capillaries. No beer yet this year, maybe a couple of glasses of wine. Try again.
Apr 15, 2016 13:30:37 #
Bazbo wrote:
Are you now the Admin? Tangents is all we do here in the Attic. including you Mr. Holier-Than-Thou.
BTW, the article cited panic-buying which opens up the whole topic, especially Franks original response.
I dont think the general point that people like you are scared s**tless and easily distracted from what the real right wing powers are doing to you is not much of a tangent.
Buy ammo and dont think.
BTW, the article cited panic-buying which opens up the whole topic, especially Franks original response.
I dont think the general point that people like you are scared s**tless and easily distracted from what the real right wing powers are doing to you is not much of a tangent.
Buy ammo and dont think.
WTF are YOU scared s**tless about? And what did t******s have to do with women wanting to protect themselves and their families?
Apr 15, 2016 13:30:07 #
Bazbo wrote:
Are you now the Admin? Tangents is all we do here in the Attic. including you Mr. Holier-Than-Thou.
BTW, the article cited panic-buying which opens up the whole topic, especially Franks original response.
I dont think the general point that people like you are scared s**tless and easily distracted from what the real right wing powers are doing to you is not much of a tangent.
Buy ammo and dont think.
BTW, the article cited panic-buying which opens up the whole topic, especially Franks original response.
I dont think the general point that people like you are scared s**tless and easily distracted from what the real right wing powers are doing to you is not much of a tangent.
Buy ammo and dont think.
WTF are YOU scared s**tless about? And what did t******s have to do with women wanting to protect themselves and their families?
Apr 15, 2016 13:28:35 #
dljen wrote:
I didn't want my reply to appear to be "veiled," I meant it to say (or be understood) the Republican Party was the one wanting to take your SS away.
What's in the article that isn't an everyday occurrence with the GOP. Buy more guns!
What's in the article that isn't an everyday occurrence with the GOP. Buy more guns!
Where in the article was SS mentioned? Where in the article was the GOP mentioned?
Apr 15, 2016 12:27:01 #
Bazbo wrote:
You never asked me, did you?
Yes I read the article. You may now apologize for accusing me of not reading it.
Maybe you should ask questions like that first before you go full tilt knee jerk reaction.
Yes I read the article. You may now apologize for accusing me of not reading it.
Maybe you should ask questions like that first before you go full tilt knee jerk reaction.
Maybe you should stop going off on tangents that would make any reasonable person doubt that you read (or comprehended) the OP. WTF did Obama/Social Security/political parties/t******s have to do with moms wanting to protect themselves and their families?
Apr 15, 2016 12:19:38 #
Apr 15, 2016 12:16:43 #
"the science is settled" has to be the stupidest phrase ever uttered by anyone. Ever.
Apr 15, 2016 12:13:33 #
Apr 15, 2016 12:11:34 #
Apr 15, 2016 12:02:24 #
Bazbo wrote:
There is nothing in anyones response that should lead you to the conclusion that the responders did notread the article. That s**t you just made up. And then you accuse others of knee jerk reactions.
My only point.
BTW, my reference to t***s people was germane to my response in that it was just another example of how right wing paste-eaters get themselves all jazzed up over crap that does not matter while the real right wing powers pick your pocket. Wake up sheeple.
My only point.
BTW, my reference to t***s people was germane to my response in that it was just another example of how right wing paste-eaters get themselves all jazzed up over crap that does not matter while the real right wing powers pick your pocket. Wake up sheeple.
You still have not admitted that you actually read it though.
None of you commented on the article.
Apr 15, 2016 11:31:45 #
Bazbo wrote:
And you are speculating that others did not read the article, something that you cannot know. You appear to guilty of the same thing that you are accusing Frank of.
I think if there is anyone here guilty of a knee-jerk reactions, its you.
I think if there is anyone here guilty of a knee-jerk reactions, its you.
My comment was based strictly on what y'all posted. Period.
Green brought in Obama, whose name is NOT in the OP's article, and did not address the article.
Frank started with "My guess", spewed something about SS and did not address the article.
Donna replied to Frank with a veiled GOP jab, and did not address the article.
You just piled onto Frank's "My guess", brought t******s into the mix, and did not address the article.
How could anyone NOT come to the conclusion that none of you read the article?
Apr 15, 2016 10:56:26 #
Al becomes a tap dancing fool when Meghan Kelly jacks him up about Ferguson this week...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHk0U44wUPk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHk0U44wUPk