Not familiar with the intervalometer settings on the D500, but I assume its the same as on my D610 and D5300. That said, I just tried to set up my D610 with the settings you describe, and it wouldn't work. Which didn't surprise me. Looked at the Nikon manual, and as you experienced, it was no help, so I looked the manual for my Vello II Shutterboss, and it stated: "Choose an interval time that is longer than your exposure time." Makes sense, doesn't it? A 20 second exposure would require a 21 second interval setting to achieve the one second lapse between images.
The relationship --or interaction-- of elements in an image are what create 'the story.' You've told a story. Nice shot!
As Adams wrote: 'the negative is the score; the print is the performance.'
As Weegee said: "f8 and be there."
fantom wrote:
Last year I went to Monument Valley to take pix from Ford Point. This is an overlook in the park where John Ford would go and scope out the valley in order to decide where to shoot scenes in the many movies he shot here.
I had recently seen his great movie "Stagecoach" that he shot parts of here and wanted to find some of his locations.
Something attracted my attention and i turned around just in time to see a band of Indians chasing a stagecoach. I quickly took the shot with whatever settings were on the camera at the time before they were gone. But, this is what I found when I got home and downloaded them a few days later.
Also, when I enlarge to 100% I can see fine white lines around the tops and sides of some of the buttes. This does not appear to be chromatic aberration. I've encountered this from time to time in the past and have removed it in Photoshop but I cannot remember how I did it. I've tried several methods and none do the job. Can anyone help me out and suggest a way to remove these white lines? You should download to see the chase and the white lines.
Thanks
Last year I went to Monument Valley to take pix fr... (
show quote)
I get this 'halo' from time to time as well (largely due to post-processing), and its really a PITA, isn't it! While there are several ways of dealing with it, the most effective way I've found of eliminating it is, in Photoshop, select the sky tones (or the rock tones, whichever is most convenient, then invert the selection), then Select> Modify >Expand (usually 2 pixels is sufficient, but results tend to vary), and using a clone brush, go in and eliminate the halo as needed.
Don't know where you live, but if you're from way far away, Welcome to Canyon Country. Monument Valley is (just) one of the sublime places around here. No idea what was being filmed while you were there, but I've worked on a few shoots in the area. They were a lot of fun.
jederick wrote:
You're in the heart of great country!
Yeah. I've noticed. When you next get down this way, gimme a holler. (Don't let us both being named 'Jim' cause us any confusion, though.)
Fun stuff. Love the Swell, and maybe moreso, the Reef. ('Lone Warrior' is on the south of I-70, though, a couple miles away from your shot of the 'Head of Sinbad' panel.) Greetings from a fellow Utahn.
I like these sorts of shots, so: Nice! Post-processed in Topaz Impressions (or something similar)? Kinda wish the close-ups were crisper, but that's just me. Well done!
South of the Windows Section, Arches National Park.
A genuinely fine set of images. Good to see work that shows what post can do. Kudos! Big time!
Linda2 wrote:
Gorgeous! I am just wondering what you and others would think about cropping a bit off the bottom-maybe showing about half of the rock formation or is the mass good? Whatever, it is fascinating!
No disagreement here wrt possibly cropping a bit out of the bottom, did so while exploring a number of possible crops in post, but compositionally settled on the pictured result. Nevertheless, anything can be improved, right?
First post here. Looking forward to discussions.