Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: phcaan
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 955 next>>
Jan 27, 2021 20:12:31   #
travelwp wrote:
There is a rumor that many dead Democrats managed to v**e.


Yup, some of them several times.
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 18:07:09   #
skylane5sp wrote:
Your empty words are meaningless. Back them up with fact.


Our boy park is a liberal, he don't need no stinking facts.
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 17:40:32   #
National Park wrote:
I am well aware of the r****t history of the Democrat party. I am also aware that the remains of the r****t elements of the party moved to the Republican party during the 1960's when Johnson got Civil Rights bills enacted into law.


Sieg heil comrade Park.
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 17:36:48   #
BlackRipleyDog wrote:
January 26th, 2021

U.S.—Google has reported a sudden spike in searches for the term "can you take back your v**e for president" among Biden v**ers.

There were some 70 million searches for the term during Biden's first week in office, sources at Google confirmed Tuesday.

"We, uh, think this must be because people are so happy to have v**ed for him, that they, uh, want to... take back their v**e and then cast it again?" said a Google spokesperson. "Because he's clearly doing such a fantastic job. It can't possibly be because people have regret for v****g for someone who turned out to be pro-war, had no C****-** plan like he promised, and walked back his promises on the $15 minimum wage."

"I mean, the guy was in office for 50 years, so it's hard to say exactly what his positions are and what he might do when he's in office."

At publishing time, Google had manually scrubbed the search trend from its servers and replaced it with "can you v**e for Joe Biden a second time because he's so amazing."
January 26th, 2021 br br U.S.—Google has reported... (show quote)


The way this e******n was run, it wouldn't have made any difference if no one v**ed for Biden, he would have acquired more v**es than there were v**ers----- oh he did that anyway.
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 17:06:43   #
RixPix wrote:
His base will end up in jail.


Another wet dream for you pix?
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 16:40:55   #
DaveO wrote:
LOL, another q-boy-buddy chimes in again.


I may chime, but you ring the bell.
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 16:39:59   #
scooter1 wrote:
He is proven biased with his first v**e to impeach. But in typical politician style he swears on his principle that he will be unbiased. Do politicians ever tell the t***h if they are backed into a corner?


Is it even possible for a democrat to vary from the script? T***h has nothing in common with the democratic agenda.
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 16:33:47   #
scooter1 wrote:
Did you post something that disagreed with my reply? "potential threat isn't o*******wing the government. They are covering their own asses after their failure on the 6th.


Well what the heck? when you steal an e******n you naturally are gonna piss some folks off.
Just an observation, mind you.
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 13:54:57   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
No, I am not sure that is exactly what it says, here is the governing clause....

"The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present."

Clearly it requires a 2/3's majority v**e to convict, what remains unclear to me is what is required to call a quorum for the proceedings to move forward.
No, I am not sure that is exactly what it says, he... (show quote)


Now one of the interesting points of this second impeachment is the fact that Patrick Leahy will preside, rather than the Chief Justice of the supreme court. In lieu of the requirements laid down by the Constitution, I wonder how this will work?
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 13:44:34   #
SteveR wrote:
Now that I've gone back to Article 1 Section 2, I do not see that there are two separate v**es. Another question comes up. It says that two thirds of the senators must be present to v**e. It doesn't say that a two thirds majority is required to convict. I've read elsewhere that a two thirds majority is required to convict. Where did that come from?


Not a problem, the honest Dems will allow mail in v**es, and more than likely find many to convict days or weeks after the trial.
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 07:48:34   #
thom w wrote:
I believe you said it when you said you were willing to accept Trump's faults. There are jobs where gambling that a persons temperament won't cause extreme harm is just too risky. POTUS is one such job.


So you approve of the reclassification of 79 million Americans as d******c t*******ts, and encourage the "reprogramming" of these citizens?
You might rethink just who is implementing f*****t policies in America.
Go to
Jan 27, 2021 07:29:57   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Really Dave? Where did I say that? Did you really have to go off the deep end? For the life of me I don't understand why you would make such an outrageous claim.

My comments had nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with the rising f*****m in this country, the calling for elected officials to be expelled from office for questioning the potential existence of fraud in the e******n, calls for Fox News to be removed from the air, Tech giants banning only conservatives and conservative thought no matter that the left plays every bit as nasty. A media that joins together to openly campaign for a political party. A media that never acknowledged the lies it fed the American public for years, a justice department weaponized against political party with the tacit approval of 1/2 the country.... Now you actually have a media calling for the deprogramming of 1/2 the country and various politicians joining in, you have others calling for no one who worked for the opposition to be allowed to gain future employment in or out of the government....

America is losing its democracy and it has nothing to do with Trump.
Really Dave? Where did I say that? Did you really ... (show quote)


Go to
Jan 25, 2021 22:08:50   #
GeorgeH wrote:
My oh my! Das Kapital, by Karl Marx is NOT a quick read. Why are you shouting with your post in all caps??


Sorry George, I'll call him and tell him to type his caps slower so you can understand him.
Go to
Jan 25, 2021 22:06:58   #
DaveO wrote:
The stench of his followers persist and honesty is not their strong suit.


So you are celebrating your "victory"? Let's just wait and see how happy you will be as a c*******t.
Go to
Jan 25, 2021 18:40:39   #
thom w wrote:
No wonder you are still called scooter and probably don't wear long pants yet.


And this has what to do regarding the post?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 955 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.