Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: pico
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
May 5, 2019 10:34:25   #
terpentijn wrote:
Indeed. Even the most high end cameras can’t capture the dynamic range of the human eye. That’s where bracketing comes in. I mostly use five to seven images for this if I really want the shot. Since I’m not a big fan of HDR I mostly perspective in a way I get a smaller dynamic range.


Thanks. Are your shots "automatic" or do you take each one individually?
Go to
May 5, 2019 10:26:13   #
martinfisherphoto wrote:
Some of You guys are killing me... Take a peek over on 500px or some other High Quality Photo Site.. The pro's on these sites are not capturing a lot of the high dynamic range photographs in One Shot... They are utilizing raw, camera's ability to shot in bracketing modes, their photoshop software and anything else they have in the tool box.....Nothing is necessary, but.......................


Excellent suggestion and thanks for your help and feedback!
Go to
May 5, 2019 10:24:32   #
bleirer wrote:
I think you have to know the limits of your gear and what you are trying to do. My gear is more middlin' for DR. I'm getting in the habit of keeping the histogram visible in the viewfinder, and it is surprising to me how many scenes dribble off the histogram both left and right in the same image. A lot of times you can figure out that what is lost is unimportant, by moving the camera or holding a hand out to block part, but sometimes you can't tell. You can take a shot and turn the blinkies on in the playback, but on my camera that only shows blown highlights. Besides taking time to chimp is more time than bracketing. So why not bracket in some cases? The film is free and you don't have to even keep the ones that are wasted.. I set it to capture normal, darker, lighter in that order. Sometimes you wish you had a shadow or highlight in your back pocket to blend.
I think you have to know the limits of your gear a... (show quote)


Thank you. Very much appreciated. So much to learn! I am now experimenting with my elements software that lets me use three bracketed shots (like yours) to combine into on final photo.
Go to
May 5, 2019 10:21:25   #
Fotoartist wrote:
Bracketing for HDR is a good idea as it keeps the noise at lower levels in the final result.


Thanks. Just discovered my software program lets me use the bracketed photos.
Go to
May 5, 2019 10:20:45   #
Speed that kills wrote:
Ok, the newbie (me) is lost... Take the photo's done by Elia Lacardia, would those be examples of photo's that are bracketed? or something completely different


I'm a newbie too so not the best person to answer that question. I have my camera set to expose three photos for bracketing. At first, I figured it was a waste of time but now I discovered my post processing software lets me combine bracketed exposures.
Go to
May 5, 2019 10:19:00   #
Say Cheese wrote:
When I do an event where there are people of many colors, I always bracket. I then choose which one is best exposed and discard the others. These are not meant to be photographic masterpieces but recording the event with the people attending.


Thank you. I have discovered that my elements software program lets me use bracketed photos (2-10 shots) as overlays. I also discovered that camera shake can cause some problems if not careful.
Go to
May 5, 2019 10:16:41   #
jlg1000 wrote:
Mathematically, each EV stop shifts one bit the sensor readout.

So, in you have a 14 bit sensor, and do +/- 1 EV bracketing, in you will effectively read 16 bit data. If you do +/- 2 EV bracket, you'll end wit 18 bit days and so on.

I've done many sure surveys my line of work, always to find out later that I've missed some important data points. So I've learned the hard way to take as many measurements as possible in the field.

The same applies for photography: get as much data (bracket) as possible, PP later.
Mathematically, each EV stop shifts one bit the se... (show quote)


Thank you!
Go to
May 5, 2019 10:15:38   #
DesRose wrote:
I know alot of people feel offended by Bob's quote. I am not. If people do not know how to use manual exposure, then it IS easier to do exposure bracketing and pick the photo with best exposure/capture. I would also add, "or for lazy people or people in a rush." When only 1 photo is truly needed to capture full dynamic range with minimal noise, it is EASIER/FASTER to just do a 3 bracket exposure instead of putting camera on manual mode and adjusting dials accordingly to get the best exposure from 1 shot. I am often guilty of this myself especially if out shooting with a group and have to move quickly. It's not as if we are shooting film. It's easy to delete any unwanted photos while saving the 'keepers'.
I know alot of people feel offended by Bob's quote... (show quote)


Thanks. I used to use photomatix several years ago but never purchased the software. Yesterday, I discovered my elements software lets me use bracketed photos as overlays. New experimentation for me.
Go to
May 5, 2019 10:13:56   #
olemikey wrote:
Situation dependent tool. I'm not much of a bracket shooter (rarely, but when I want it - I want it) but in a run-n-gun situation, where on the move, focus and lighting challenges, little time for settings, more potentially good captures per click, another tool in the box. One can imagine quite a few situations where it is a useful function, with no shame attached.


Thanks. I am also revisiting my elements software on how to group the photos for bracketing.
Go to
May 5, 2019 10:12:29   #
rmalarz wrote:
As I've seen quoted before, "bracketing in for people who don't know how to expose properly".
--Bob


Thanks!
Go to
May 4, 2019 11:25:29   #
I've experimented with bracketing using three exposures. What is gained in the post-processing as a result of bracketing? Thanks for your thoughts and experiences.
Go to
May 4, 2019 07:57:30   #
Blenheim Orange wrote:
You have been here long enough to know better than to insert politics into discussions. Take it to the Attic.

Mike


"Like!"
Go to
Apr 27, 2019 23:37:16   #
pithydoug wrote:
Find a camera club or even a forum that does reasonable critiques. Without knowledgeable people giving you guidance, it is hard to improve. At least 25% of you time should be .in education


Thank you for your suggestions.
Go to
Apr 27, 2019 23:35:40   #
poppi49 wrote:
There's a huge difference between you and your wife. She just wants pictures. You want PHOTOGRAPHY!!! Get off auto as soon as possible, and be patient while learning. You only learn with experimentation, and lots of failures along the way. But that's not failure -- that's progress. Most importantly, enjoy learning and celebrate all of your new experiences.


So very true! I do enjoy learning and will adjust my expectations and watch my growth. Thanks.
Go to
Apr 27, 2019 23:34:14   #
jcspics wrote:
Hey buddy please don't let that criticism get to you. I know that there is a lot to learn however that camera is the best 'Bang for the buck" DSLR Nikon that you could've bought. I'm here to tell you that I'm on my third D7200 and am putting a link to a website that will help you get a few things setup like back button focus (a must have change).

https://ditchauto.com/top-5-settings-change-nikon-d7200-2/

I'm a sports photographer but in my experience any camera that can shoot in the no-flash and low light that gymnastics photography demands can pretty much take any type of photograph.

The next thing is understanding metering modes and how to setup your camera to get the exposure right.

https://photographylife.com/understanding-metering-modes

I don't want you to give up and just remember that practice is how you get to Carnegie Hall...

Hope you find the linked info and moral support helpful and to answer your question: I'm my own worst critic. I wish I was able to work with you to help speed up the learning process...

-Jim Cameron

JCStudio Photography
Hey buddy please don't let that criticism get to y... (show quote)


Jim,
Thanks so very much for your thoughts and support. I will check out our websites.
Joe
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.