Racmanaz wrote:
How is Rand Paul not totally correct? He said that TikTok is not owned by the Chinese government and he appears go be correct. Even the 2 links you provided doesn’t say that the Chinese government owns TikTok that I could see.
You are splitting hairs, no surprise. If you know anything about corporate finance with 50% of the v****g shares, in a company that has multiple owners, it controls the company. With a lesser spread 51% would be the magic number. Likewise if you own the company, but someone else pulls the overall strings, the owner is really just a surrogate for the puppet-master, in this case the Chinese government.
The Chinese government seems to follow in many ways the Russian model using oligarchs, ownership is divided between those loyal to the regime who are experts in their respective field, but follow the guidelines imposed by the central government. Zhang may "own" the stock, but he's really just a surrogate for the central government. Using this methodology, Zhang can say I own the company not "them," being the Chinese government, but per our US analysis he's just a rich puppet. Like Russia, if the oligarchs step out of line - they should start making funeral plans:
https://www.businessinsider.com/list-of-people-putin-is-suspected-of-assassinating-2016-3
We are entering more and more into the era of AI, corporations like Google know one crapload about who you like, your health issues, what you eat and so on; hence the need for barriers on your browsing, etc. Do you really want the Chinese government to know the same things (btw they already know a lot about you). Also China allows Tic-Toc in their country, but bans Facebook, etc. which is American owned. Why should we allow Tic-Toc to operate here, when they ban our companies?
Should I have awakened your paranoia - it goes deeper. Scientists and engineers are working on quantum computers that are well beyond our current binary machines that will make your conventional security codes, passwords, etc obsolete. And their usage is not far away.
Take it a little further, suppose you subscribe to a data base like 23 and me; if the Chinese has access to your dna, can they, in this era of gene editing, make up a contagion that targets a particular populace? Scary stuff.
Last point, do you think politicians might change there position on issues once they find the people that they opposed start writing big fat checks to the politician's re-e******n fund?