Posts for: Marg
Mar 16, 2022 10:10:54 #
nmw1004 wrote:
I don't really notice it. The composition is exellent, nice photo.
Thank you so much, nmw!
Mar 16, 2022 10:10:00 #
StanMac wrote:
Leave the sky, Marg.
Stan
Stan
I think I will, Stan but will darken it just a tad.
Mar 16, 2022 10:08:49 #
Bubbee wrote:
It's outdoors...It fits the scene. Very nice!
Thank you, Bubbee! I appreciate the comment!
Mar 16, 2022 10:08:02 #
Ava'sPapa wrote:
The blue sky is fine Marg. If it were me I would get rid of the two barren twigs up in that corner.
Thanks, Ava’sPapa! I’ll do that! By the way - I just read your post about Brent Harder. So very sorry to hear that. What a wonderful photographer!
Mar 16, 2022 10:04:09 #
randave2001 wrote:
I personally do not find the sky to be an overwhelming distraction, but I suggest you do a crop and compare to the uncropped version. I feel your crop would remove more of the vehicle on the right which might be more desirable than getting rid of the sky. One crop and you can accomplish both. If you are using LR this can be done non-destructively in only moments.
Thanks for your suggestions, Dave! I’ll give it a try.
Mar 16, 2022 10:03:05 #
compilot wrote:
To me that little bit ov sky is NOT distracting at all. The rusting Jeep truck pulls me right to it, then I see the rest of the scene. I'd leave as is. Good luck, Cheers.
Thank you so much, compilot!
Mar 16, 2022 10:02:10 #
cdayton wrote:
I would crop out the sky and the rear end of the tow truck (?) on the right, but that’s just personal preference.
Thanks, Cdayton! Personal preference is really what it ultimately comes down to isn’t it?!
Mar 16, 2022 09:59:04 #
ecobin wrote:
No issue with the sky, Marg.
I appreciate that, Elliott!
Mar 16, 2022 09:58:34 #
jaymatt wrote:
No. The eye goes directly to the old Jeep pickup, so the blue is unobtrusive.
Thank you very much. John! (By the way - the camera club is going great!)
Mar 16, 2022 09:56:58 #
camerapapi wrote:
If it was my image I would crop it without the sky. Another thing I would do is to desaturate the intense red of the truck, easily done with Photoshop or other software using Selective Color and choosing red. A b&w conversion properly done would be nice also.
Just my thoughts.
Just my thoughts.
Thanks for your thoughts, William. Always welcomed! By the way I truly loved your Shark Valley series.
Mar 16, 2022 09:52:26 #
Ollywho wrote:
Great Photo. I did not find the sky distracting.
Thanks very much, Olly! Good to know.
Mar 16, 2022 09:51:23 #
Jimmy T wrote:
The very small section of the sky is not a distraction at all.
In fact, it is a very interesting pic as is.
I do Love the patina of the now-retired jeep.
IMHO I would crop much tighter removing the broad expanse of both the plain side of the building (above) and the wrecker to the right.
Maybe my take would just be different and not any better . . .
Smile,
JimmyT Sends
In fact, it is a very interesting pic as is.
I do Love the patina of the now-retired jeep.
IMHO I would crop much tighter removing the broad expanse of both the plain side of the building (above) and the wrecker to the right.
Maybe my take would just be different and not any better . . .
Smile,
JimmyT Sends
Jimmy thanks for your comments and suggestions. And of course as always, the smile!
Mar 16, 2022 09:49:29 #
sueyeisert wrote:
It is distracting. The eye goes to a light area. Cropping the photo will not hurt the photo and will improve it.
Thank you, Sue. I’ll give that a try.
Mar 16, 2022 09:48:41 #
J-SPEIGHT wrote:
Not distracting at all Marg. I like it as is
Thanks, Jack! Glad you do!
Mar 16, 2022 09:47:56 #
Celtis87 wrote:
In this composition, not an issue at all. Very nice image. Striking!
Thank you. Celtis87. I appreciate your time!