Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: J. R. WEEMS
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 19 next>>
Jan 17, 2015 23:33:12   #
Cut my teeth on a box camera and in later years had my own small darkroom -- wish there was some way to copy all those negatives with my D80 or D700 ----
Go to
Jan 16, 2015 01:37:09   #
musthava wrote:
HI.
Just thought I would let you know I have bought another red dot sight for my other camera, this time with the adapter and rail as a set from shop.brando.com The new mount and rail look way superior to the old one. Click below to have a look. Here's hoping. Cheers. Maybe they sell the mount and rail separate, not sure. Happy shooting, with the camera of course.


http://shop.brando.com/Wildlife-Photography-with-Tactical-Four-Reticle-Sight_p12417c1778d138.html


PERFECT!! THANKS!!! :)
Go to
Jan 15, 2015 11:36:00   #
Architect1776 wrote:
Send a photo of the final rig mounted. I am very curious now about it.


Myself as well--
Go to
Jan 15, 2015 11:17:27   #
MT Shooter wrote:
I use a Red Dot sight often when shooting a 600mm or 800mm lens because the FOV is so narrow that it is sometimes hard to acquire your subject quickly. Mine is switchable from red to blue to green with 3 different intensities of each so it works in almost any weather conditions.
I first rigged it up to mount in the hotshoe but quickly found out that was a bad idea as it made using the viewfinder very difficult. I then rigged it up on a Stroboframe flash bracket so it is directly above the viewfinder a few inches and that works a LOT better. It does help in subject acquisition, and I get a lot of funny looks when using it too.
I use a Red Dot sight often when shooting a 600mm ... (show quote)


Yes, I have read this before and think it would be great for my 600 for all the reasons you state. Never herd of one with different color selections-- please list it by brand name and where one can be had. It is NEXT on my to buy list-- THANKS!! :)
Go to
Jan 15, 2015 11:09:35   #
Got it done!! All up to date--- THANKS ALL!!! :)
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 20:06:22   #
Am attempting to update the firmware in D700 -- all goes well, except instructions do no show with the final instructions-- any clue here. Computer is updated to Yosemite-- might THAT be the problem?? At a loss here??
Oh yes, the word UPDATE is not showing on the screen under DONE -- Watched a video on this and that option was listed THANKS!! :)
__________________
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 12:48:17   #
Dngallagher wrote:
FYI:

Good info here on real world testing for read/write speeds of various cards and various cameras...

http://www.cameramemoryspeed.com/


Interesting, but my cameras are not listed, those being a D80 & D700. :)
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 12:43:25   #
camerapapi wrote:
I reviewed some of your portfolios and I saw many excellent photographs there and I have to admit that with your knowledge it surprised me that you are not thoroughly familiar with memory cards.
Cards are slow or fast and that obviously applies to both, CF and SD. If you buy a 32 Gb card for example with a rate of 4 you should not expect speed on downloading or in its performance. Here you have a card with lots of Gbs but limited in speed. On the other hand you could have a 32 Gb card rated 10 which is much faster and the manufacturer usually gives us the rate of speed at which the card reads and write in Gb and an isolated example would be a rate of 40 Gb/sec.
Please, understand that a card that has been labeled by the manufacturer as reading 40 Gb/sec. does not necessarily means that will be the same speed when writing to the card. It is usually slower than that but many times good enough to keep a good speed.
If you are into landscapes, snapshots, portraits or photographs of subjects that are static you do not need a fast card. A slower card could take a few more seconds to download but it will do the job and you will save money.
If you want speed, something necessary for fast downloads and action photography then you have to buy fast cards and you will have to do some research on them.
Each manufacturer has a way to say "speed" and it should not surprise you to find on some of this cards numbers like 400X or 600X.
Lexar, Kingston and SanDisk make excellent speed cards.
I reviewed some of your portfolios and I saw many ... (show quote)




Yes, well I must confess, I have been so busy the last 10 years learning everything else, I simply never gave thought to the cards. In the beginning I just bought what Costco sold and that was it. These being for my D80-- For the D700, I began with Lexar CF cards, and 600x was what was available. A short research after reading your post brought to light cameras are just so fast as well, that being 1066-- Not sure where to find this information for camera model, but have doubts that the D80 is that fast. My reader is a Lexar 3.0 as I said. The transfer from the card in the reader to computer seemed to be the bottleneck -- My mac is up to date, and I have just over hauled everything so we shall see. I just hate falling asleep while transfering photos. :) I reformat my cards in camera as well. I will look for cards faster than I have, and hope for better results.
Would like to THANK!! everyone for your input. I only shoot RAW sowith faster cards, maybe that will help. :)
Go to
Jan 14, 2015 09:20:05   #
Earworms wrote:
Excellent article!

Did you know that SD Cards should be formatted/reformatted with the official SD Card formatter and not the formatting utility of your Mac or PC?


this has thus been unknown to me. I have formatted my SD cards in camera since 2006 when I got my first D80-- doesn't seem to be a problem. Have one Lexar CF card that seems to hve gone bad for some reason. Was able to recover most all the photos, and tried reformatting it but to no avail. Have never got around to sending it back. My cards are mostly 600x, I am not sure how fast is fast??
Go to
Jan 13, 2015 16:49:38   #
[quote=brucewells]The largest card I have is 32GB. My logic says that if my card goes bad, I don't want to lose 64 or 128 GB of images.

But, the size of the card has nothing to do with download speed, other than the obvious that a larger card could contain more images and thus take longer.

I can get right at 600 raw images on a 32GB card. I'd think 3 or 4 of them in my pocket would take me through any shoot I might do.

Well, this is sort of my point-- larger card, more photos, of course--
Point being, download time-- Aperture became REALLY slow-- I mean S L O W -- would LR be faster??
Go to
Jan 13, 2015 16:47:11   #
RJarvis wrote:
I just bought a SanDisk 64GB CF card (for my D800) on eBay but haven't used it yet. What I discovered while browsing eBay is that you pay more for speed a well as capacity. SanDisk sells a "SanDisk Extreme" and an "Extreme PRO." Download time for the PRO is advertised as 160MB/s and for the non-PRO, 120 MB/s. The price difference is $30-40.

The D800 (and its siblings) has slots for both SD and CF cards. I had already bought a 32GB SD card and I set the camera to store both JPG and RAW files. Bad idea. When I went to take the card out of the camera (to insert into the computer) it was stuck. I finally got it out and discovered the plastic housing was melted near the contacts. I filed down the melted plastic and found, to my relief, that the files were still intact and the card still worked. And, then I quickly decided to use the second slot for a CF card, for the RAW files. My Dell laptop has slots for both card types so now, everything is cool (literally).
I just bought a SanDisk 64GB CF card (for my D800)... (show quote)


MELTED?? Wow. now that would gather my interest as to cause etc????????
Go to
Jan 13, 2015 14:45:21   #
Early on, I got to thinking larger cards, mostly CF cards, were the way to go. After finding out they took so long to down load all those RAW files, using Aperture I went with 8GB cards. I am now wondering if it wasn't Aperture that was the problem and now as I have LR, I have to wonder if I can go back to larger cards?? Anyone have experience with this?? Or a suggestion?? THANKS!! :)
Go to
Jan 13, 2015 14:32:55   #
Maybe Davenport/Quad Cities area??? Never saw one when growing up there. Left at 17 for the Marine Corps and never returned. Deer and Eagles seem to be the norm there now. :)
Go to
Jan 5, 2015 22:23:42   #
Yes, they do great work-- here is my FB header photo. :)


Go to
Jan 5, 2015 22:12:40   #
Yes, the Elk in the Smokies are collared-- it can be worked around if you work at it. Nice photo. Wildlife does not for the most part pose for us. We must learn to pick our shots -- for me, hard to do. :) PP is not my thing either, but I am working on it LR is a good place to start. :)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 19 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.