Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: srt101fan
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 372 next>>
Apr 12, 2024 09:44:52   #
SteveR wrote:
The only people on my ignore list were from the Attic. I have no idea if they even post anymore.


Some UHHers lead dual lives, with strong Jekyll- Hyde personas.....🤔
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 08:53:11   #
Lucian wrote:
Although I understand what you are saying here, there is still no point in offering gushing praise on a set of images that are, well, not good photos, in a number of ways. Whether the poster is asking for comments or not.

Now this also may be, because those posting such praise, themselves have no clue as to what makes a good photograph and what does not. Therefore, we effectively have the blind leading the blind and there is no fixing that.


Well, what DOES make a good photograph?

UHH member "User ID" seems to be a professional with more photography knowledge than almost anyonr around here. Are his photographs "good"?
Go to
Apr 11, 2024 14:59:04   #
I think some of you are over-kneading this dough. This idea that the Gallery posters have no interest in improving their game just seems silly to me.

Please look at my Gallery post at
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-637463-1.html#11050983
It's not a great shot - through a dirty window with a lowly lens set at max zoom (300mm) held by old shaky hands. But I thought the subject and resulting photo interesting enough to post. No big deal, no expectations of attaboys, just hoping for a little conversation and some fun. The positive reactions were nice but the most appreciated were comments regarding fox behavior.

So it isn't all about posting photos and seeking advice for improvement!
Go to
Apr 11, 2024 10:13:47   #
BigDaddy wrote:
Fantastic work. Sharp, well focused and I personally love it, even if you don't really care what others think. Acoarst, some improvement could be made if your removed the white fringe from around the fence.

But that's just my unsolicited opinion, which I think I'm allowed to give since we're not in the precious gallery, where people that take pictures for themselves only, could care less what others think, and have no interest in improving either because they're old, or already know everything. (Not too sure why people would bother posting their photo's on a public forum if they're not interested in others opinions?)

I'd like to blow a special raspberry to all those that don't wish to improve, regardless of endeavor.

BTW, you posted your phone pic in the wrong space, there is a forum specifically for phone pics...
Fantastic work. Sharp, well focused and I personal... (show quote)


Ha Ha! (Good post!)
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 11:07:12   #
dennis2146 wrote:
Are you possibly confusing those of us who are NOT in the business of photography with those who are? I submit my photos because this is a photography forum where we enjoy looking at each other's photographs, discussing those photographs and possibly discussions of what equipment was used, how to achieve a similar photo and so on. We offer praise for those people who have submitted their best work while we realize your best work may easily surpass the quality of my best work. Yet we are each proud of our submissions.

When I submit my photos I do want to hear positives but I am acceptable of someone offering a well meant suggestion on how to better my photo next time. I may not agree with something such as composition but will accept the comment from someone who would have composed my photo differently.

Dennis
Are you possibly confusing those of us who are NOT... (show quote)


No, I'm not confusing pros and hobbyists. I just don't believe folks who claim they don't care what other people think of their creative output.
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 10:59:28   #
Longshadow wrote:
Please don't put words in my mouth!
I never said "the hell with the rest of the world", I'm just not worried about their opinion.
There is a difference! A large difference!


I just used that as an expression; maybe not a good choice...
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 10:06:11   #
Longshadow wrote:
It's called self confidence.
I do not worry about what others think.

Nope, I don't.
If they like them, that's great, if they don't that's fine also.
I'm not in the business to sell photographs.
Not everyone's taste matches mine. I'm not shooting for their taste.
And since I shoot for me, well, that's what they get to see.
I simply provide the option.


I guess I understand, sort of.....

But I don't believe for a minute that self confidence in what you like and "the hell with the rest of the world" is enough for a creative person.

Do you really think a writer can happily write books that nobody reads? Or that composers can happily write music that nobody wants to listen to? I don't think so. But I'm going too far off topic...
Go to
Apr 10, 2024 09:31:00   #
Longshadow wrote:
Well, I'm over 70 and not obsessed with improving my photography (for over 50 years), I'm quite satisfied with it.
And if something doesn't work out the way I anticipated it to, oh well.
I shoot for me, not to be "perfect", but to enjoy what I do. It works.
I enjoy photography so much more not worrying about always making things "better".

Yes, my prerogative.


You (and quite a few others) emphasize that you are the only one who needs to like your work, that opinions of others are unimportant. It's almost a badge of honor to not care what other people think.

Yet you sell your photos. Don't you care what your customers like and don't like?
Go to
Apr 9, 2024 19:42:47   #
Longshadow wrote:
Remember, perfection is an asymptote.
But yes, there is always room for improvement.
It just depends on how close to infinity one wants to get.
(Or wants others to get.)


Now, you didn't use "Quote Reply" and the post immediately ahead of yours was from you. Are you talking to yourself? 😁
Go to
Apr 9, 2024 13:25:56   #
MJPerini wrote:
Folks, one of the joys of photography is that it can bee enjoyed at many levels. Everyone starts somewhere.
The gallery is meant to be a "riskless" place to see your photo on the internet, and show it to others.
There is a reason it is structured that way, it encourages people to post regardless of their skill level.
These folks are not looking for your criticism, even if it is well intentioned. They just want to post pictures they are proud of.
There are lots of other places where criticism IS allowed , here and other places.
Having one place free from criticism, where people can feel safe is a very good idea.
Also, try to remember the audience....... This is not some high stakes gallery, I is a cordial meeting place for mostly older photographers to share and talk about Photography. All skill levels are welcome, and we do have lots of accomplished photographers as well as those who just do it for enjoyment.
Unsolicited criticism is generally not welcome anywhere, even if it is meant to be helpful
That should be a pretty easy concept to understand.
Be happy, take Pictures
Folks, one of the joys of photography is that it c... (show quote)


I agree with your well-expressed comments. I think there is another side to the Gallery. And that is to start a discussion around the photo's subject. I once posted a picture of a yawning fox. I got a surprising number of the "nice shot" kind of comments. But I also got a few folks describing their experiences with these interesting animals.
Go to
Apr 7, 2024 10:42:04   #
Wallen wrote:
A comment which is according to a video I saw, just minutes after it happened.
Obviousy, a view of the event based at the information I have then.
How does that initial comment be, and according to your previous post, collate all my discussion as ramblings?


Wallen, I highlighted one of your comments but there are many others that, taken together, constitute ramblings of unsubstantiated innuendos (*) and conjectures. I think you know better and are just playing games.


(*) From Wikipedia: "An innuendo is a hint, insinuation or intimation about a person or thing, especially of a denigrating or derogatory nature. It can also be a remark or question, typically disparaging (also called insinuation), that works obliquely by allusion. In the latter sense, the intention is often to insult or accuse someone in such a way that one's words, taken literally, are innocent."
Go to
Apr 6, 2024 17:01:09   #
Wallen wrote:

Your misreading my posts as well.
I'm not stating this and that is what happened.
Just discussing the event and clarifying why i have such points of view.


"But was heading for the pillar the whole time, maybe a full 10 minutes before impact, and was moving very fast for such a small navigation space at night." -- This is not "stating this and that is what happened"??
Go to
Apr 6, 2024 15:06:04   #
Delderby wrote:
You are evading the issue and going round in circles.


What is the issue I'm evading? 🤔
Go to
Apr 6, 2024 13:32:04   #
Delderby wrote:
Why should there be need to "Go read his original topic" when he is specific in the second topic what his request was in the first topic - quote - "I recently posted a request for advice on printers"


Read his original topic and the replies he got....
Go to
Apr 6, 2024 12:12:21   #
burkphoto wrote:
It is for anyone who uses precise language. The Op used the term ‘Printer.’ ‘Lab’ is what he wanted. Be careful what you ask for. You might just get it.


Go back to his original topic. His respondents understood what he meant. Why didn't you?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 372 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.