Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: EyeSawYou
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 1167 next>>
Apr 19, 2020 17:25:11   #
tramsey wrote:
He's busy talking to God. "Why me?"


LOL Who is going to ask "why me" when you are in paradise with God?
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 17:24:21   #
RixPix wrote:
Well, someone got called home.


If he was called home to heaven to be with God, then death had no power over him and therefore God is bigger.
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 17:22:33   #
Kraken wrote:
The battle for the Senate majority is tightening as the c****av***s threatens to plunge the economy into a severe recession and as President Trump’s handling of the crisis comes under increased scrutiny.

With E******n Day just over six months away, some Senate Democratic candidates are starting to outraise vulnerable Republican incumbents in states where Trump’s approval rating has taken a hit.

Senate Republicans, who control 53 seats, are still the favorite to retain control of the chamber, but Democrats are narrowing the gap.

“Broadly, over the last several months the Senate has overall gotten more competitive to the point where I don’t know if it’s quite 50-50 in terms of the battle for control — maybe you’d slightly rather be the Republicans — but I think it’s become very competitive,” said Kyle Kondik, managing editor at Sabato’s Crystal Ball at the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics.

“States like North Carolina and Maine have gotten better and better for Democrats throughout the cycle,” he added.

The Cook Political Report, another nonpartisan forecasting group, says “the chances of Democrats taking back the Senate are rising and [are] now close to 50-50 odds” with “several plausible paths” for Democrats to win a majority.

Democratic challengers have outraised GOP incumbents in Arizona, Colorado, Kentucky, Maine, Montana, North Carolina and South Carolina. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) had its best ever first-quarter fundraising haul, at $28 million.

The DSCC raised $11 million in March compared to the $9.1 million for the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC).

The Senate Republican fundraising arm still outraised the DSCC during the first three months of the year. The NRSC raised $30.3 million in the first quarter, doubling its previous first-quarter record of $16.4 million. And it has $32.4 million in cash on hand, shattering the previous first-quarter record of an e******n year, which was $20 million.

Some of the most eye-opening fundraising figures were in Kentucky, where veteran Marine Corps fighter pilot Amy McGrath reported raising $12.8 million in the first three months of 2020 in her bid to deny Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) a seventh term.

McConnell raised $7.5 million in the second quarter. They have about the same amount of cash on hand, with McGrath reporting $14.7 million to McConnell’s $14.9 million.

The GOP leader is still the favorite to win ree******n, but the fundraising numbers are significant because they mean he will have to spend more time and money playing defense at home, offering fewer opportunities to raise money for vulnerable Republicans in battleground states.

Jesse Hunt, the NRSC’s communications director, argued that a wave of donations from Democrats on the coasts won’t be enough to overcome what he called lack of support for liberal policies.

“Democrat candidates are relying on the same liberal donors that have been fueling the dark money groups spending big against Republican incumbents,” he said. “Money can’t erase their embrace of a socialist agenda deeply unpopular with mainstream v**ers.”

Meanwhile, Trump’s approval rating has taken a dive during the p******c after initial gains.

A Gallup poll published Thursday showed the president’s approval rating at 43 percent, falling 6 percentage points from mid-March, the sharpest drop since he took office.

Gallup warned “the current health and economic crisis is undoubtedly the greatest challenge of his presidency so far — and could imperil his standing in the final year of his first term as he seeks re-e******n.”

The polling outfit found that only 30 percent of Americans were satisfied with the way things are going, a 12-point drop since early March.

“I think the Democrats definitely look like they’re in a better position. I think it’s due primarily that middle-of-the-road Americans are probably not too happy with the president’s performance during this crisis,” said Steven S. Smith, a professor of political science at Washington University in St. Louis.

“The biggest problem for Republicans is the president. Money comes with that,” he added.

Smith said Democrats’ anger with Trump is fueling their fundraising advantage because “anger is usually a stronger motivator than having positive views of what’s gone on.”

Trump’s drop in the Gallup poll, Smith said, is a “reversion to the mean” since his approval rating has generally been in the low 40s and can be attributed to “the perception he has not handled the crisis properly and that’s certainly something the Democrats are going to emphasize.”

Trump has come under withering criticism for his administration’s slow response to the rapid spread of the deadly c****av***s.

Anthony F***i, the federal government’s top infectious disease expert, gave critics some ammo last week when he said more lives could have been saved if the country had shut down earlier. F***i later walked back the remarks, saying it was the “wrong choice of words” after the president shared a tweet that included the hashtag #FireF***i.

One of the biggest problems for Trump is the lack of c****av***s testing kits, which made it tougher to contain the v***s’s spread at the start of the p******c and could make it even harder to reopen the economy.

That’s also a problem for Senate Republicans, says Kondik, who predicted that Senate races will largely track Trump’s performance. While he said that Sen. Susan Collins (R) is likely to outperform the president in Maine, candidates like Sens. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and Steve Daines (R-Mont.) could conceivably underperform the top of the b****t.

Daines’s ree******n bid got more competitive last month when Montana Gov. Steve Bullock (D) announced he would challenge the incumbent, after refusing for months entreaties by Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.).

“Ultimately, when you hold the presidency you’re responsible for what goes on. Certainly the president has taken a ton of credit when things are going well. So it’s natural that if in fact there’s a backlash, it will be more against Republicans than Democrats,” Kondik said.

Kondik said Bullock’s decision to enter the race may be seen as a turning point in the battle for the Senate when historians look back at 2020.

A lot will depend on how smoothly the country endures the p******c and whether the economy can get back on solid footing by November. If it does, Trump will undoubtedly declare victory. In the meantime, he has been using the daily c****av***s briefings to tout his administration’s performance in dealing with the crisis.

But even with all of the challenges facing GOP incumbents, the math is still in their favor.

Republicans are favored to win back the Alabama Senate seat held by Sen. Doug Jones (D). While Jones has raised more money than the Republican field combined, T***p w*n the state by 28 points in 2016.

That means Democrats will have to capture four GOP-held seats and the White House to win back the Senate majority, which they lost in 2014.

Their most likely pickups are in Arizona and Colorado, where the Democratic candidates Mark Kelly and former Gov. John Hickenlooper have raised substantially more money than their Republican opponents, Sens. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.) and Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), respectively.

The Cook Report’s Jessica Taylor wrote on Friday that the fundraising “disparity is only further evidence that political momentum is largely on the side of Democrats as they continue to expand the battlefield of competitive races.”

Earlier in the cycle, Collins and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) were the favorites to win ree******n, but now their races are rated toss-ups.

Polls show Kelly solidly ahead of McSally in Arizona.

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who seemed to have her ree******n well in hand only a few months ago, now looks more vulnerable.

Democrats, sensing Ernst’s vulnerability, are putting more money into the race, and the Cook Report has downgraded the seat from “likely Republican” to “lean Republican.”

Democratic strategists say fundraising is only part of the story and point to record v**er turnout in Democratic p**********l primary contests before the p******c struck as evidence of high party enthusiasm heading into the general e******n.

“As Democratic candidates focus on serving their states and communities at this time, unprecedented grassroots support is fueling their campaigns and our path to flipping the Senate continues to expand,” said DSCC spokesman Stewart Boss.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/493441-democrats-gain-new-momentum-in-fight-for-senate-majority
The battle for the Senate majority is tightening a... (show quote)


Demcorats will not take control of the Senate this coming e******n. I do think that Kelly will probably defeat Martha McDoNothing.
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 14:05:13   #
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
The problem with your theory is that trump DIDN'T learn from his mistakes when he ended up bankrupting THREE casinos in a short period of time, within 2 calendar years in 1991 and 1992!

The cause of last one was because trump kept changing the interior design and upgrading the furniture and fixtures to luxury priced items so he could have a status symbol "palace" at the time when Atlantic City was no longer drawing in the high rollers, or the large crowds he needed just to make ends meet.

Also in 1992, trump Plaza Hotel declared bankruptcy!

trump Hotels and Casino Resorts filed for bankruptcy again in 2004.

And trump Entertainment and Resorts filed for bankruptcy in 2009!
The problem with your theory is that trump DIDN'T ... (show quote)


Again for illiterate h**e mongers such as yourself who h**e t***h and context. Trump has/had about 515 businesses/investments and around 7-12 of those business had to file Chapter 11 bankruptcy, that t***slates to an astonishing 98% success rate over all.
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 14:00:53   #
photosbytw wrote:
Sorry........went for quick bite...........who's winning?


T***h is winning and has already won, which means the OP lost.
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 13:23:56   #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Funny!

You wouldn't know FACTS if they slapped your mother.
Fox News can set you straight!


LOL That's hilarious, I debunked your lies with facts yet you reject those facts.
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 13:22:50   #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Before sending it to the United States Senate Clinton added two side agreements, the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) and the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), to protect workers and the environment, and to also allay the concerns of many House members. The U.S. required its partners to adhere to environmental practices and regulations similar to its own.[citation needed] After much consideration and emotional discussion, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act on November 17, 1993, 234–200. The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993, 61–38.[21] Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; the agreement went into effect on January 1, 1994.[22][23] Clinton, while signing the NAFTA bill, stated that "NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement."[24] NAFTA then replaced the previous Canada-US FTA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement
Before sending it to the United States Senate Clin... (show quote)


LOL Why are you posting what I already posted and supports my argument against yours 2-3 times???
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 13:21:46   #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Braindead!

SENATE supporters were 34 R and 27 D
HOUSE supporters were 132 R and 102 D

Would NEVER have gotten to Clinton's desk if 164 Republicans hadn't supported it!


Brain-dead??? LOL You implied that the NAFTA bill was supported by Republicans but omitted the fact that NAFTA was also supported by Democrats and Bill Clinton. LOL You even submitted the numbers as I did that support my conclusion.
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 13:11:53   #
Allie wrote:
Tell us, what publications do you subscribe to, and what are your sources, besides Fox News and Rush Limbaugh?


What does it matter what publications I may or may not financially subscribe to? I'm assuming you meant paid subscriptions.
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 13:10:38   #
Allie wrote:
The Washington Post usually backs up it’s sources. Please tell us, who do you consider real journalists—those whose remarks agree with your pre-conceived notions?


The Washington Post was a purveyor of the Russia/Trump f**e news conspiracy for 3 years, what sources did they use to back that conspiracy?
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 12:36:37   #
photosbytw wrote:
This is as bad as watching a tennis match.................


That boring ha? Lol Well, unless you're watching women's tennis.
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 12:34:09   #
You said in part; Guess what! The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993. IT WAS PASSED BY REPUBLICANS!



The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993, 61–38. Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; the agreement went into effect on January 1, 1994. Clinton, while signing the NAFTA bill, stated that "NAFTA means jobs.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki
North American Free Trade Agreement - Wikipedia
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 12:28:54   #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Unreal!

NAFTA was a Republican idea (actually it was more than just an idea) - the FACTS are in front of you yet, you still blame Clinton for it!!?? That's totally, utterly crazy! Was he supposed to say, "This is a Republican idea so I'm not going to sign it"?

Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1990, the leaders of the three nations signed the agreement in their respective capitals on December 17, 1992. The signed agreement then needed to be ratified by each nation's legislative or parliamentary branch. Clinton RATIFIED the bill!

You then go on to say that NAFTA was supported by Democrats.... that sure sounds like pointing the finger as to why it passed!

Guess what! The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993. IT WAS PASSED BY REPUBLICANS!

I'd really like to put this argument to bed but, before I do, here is a somewhat unbiased article you might want to read by theGuardian. They are a British newspaper and not affiliated to the US - either side.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/30/nafta-what-is-it-why-is-trump-trying-to-renegotiate
Unreal! br br NAFTA was a Republican idea (actual... (show quote)



"Perot ultimately lost the e******n, and the winner, Bill Clinton, supported NAFTA, which went into effect on January 1, 1994.:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 12:25:28   #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Unreal!

NAFTA was a Republican idea (actually it was more than just an idea) - the FACTS are in front of you yet, you still blame Clinton for it!!?? That's totally, utterly crazy! Was he supposed to say, "This is a Republican idea so I'm not going to sign it"?

Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1990, the leaders of the three nations signed the agreement in their respective capitals on December 17, 1992. The signed agreement then needed to be ratified by each nation's legislative or parliamentary branch. Clinton RATIFIED the bill!

You then go on to say that NAFTA was supported by Democrats.... that sure sounds like pointing the finger as to why it passed!

Guess what! The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993. IT WAS PASSED BY REPUBLICANS!

I'd really like to put this argument to bed but, before I do, here is a somewhat unbiased article you might want to read by theGuardian. They are a British newspaper and not affiliated to the US - either side.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/30/nafta-what-is-it-why-is-trump-trying-to-renegotiate
Unreal! br br NAFTA was a Republican idea (actual... (show quote)


What exactly was"UNREAL" in my statement?

"I agreed with you that NAFTA was a Republican idea, that again wasn't my argument. I also didn't initially blame Clinton for that idea, yet he did sign the bill so it's on his head as well. Again, it was a Republican idea supported by many Democrats and signed into law by President Clinton."
Go to
Apr 19, 2020 12:23:09   #
BooIsMyCat wrote:
Unreal!

NAFTA was a Republican idea (actually it was more than just an idea) - the FACTS are in front of you yet, you still blame Clinton for it!!?? That's totally, utterly crazy! Was he supposed to say, "This is a Republican idea so I'm not going to sign it"?

Following diplomatic negotiations dating back to 1990, the leaders of the three nations signed the agreement in their respective capitals on December 17, 1992. The signed agreement then needed to be ratified by each nation's legislative or parliamentary branch. Clinton RATIFIED the bill!

You then go on to say that NAFTA was supported by Democrats.... that sure sounds like pointing the finger as to why it passed!

Guess what! The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993. IT WAS PASSED BY REPUBLICANS!

I'd really like to put this argument to bed but, before I do, here is a somewhat unbiased article you might want to read by theGuardian. They are a British newspaper and not affiliated to the US - either side.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/30/nafta-what-is-it-why-is-trump-trying-to-renegotiate
Unreal! br br NAFTA was a Republican idea (actual... (show quote)


Lol you really can't be this illiterate can you be?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 1167 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.