Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Mario22
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16 next>>
Jan 7, 2023 15:54:10   #
Wow! I absolutely love the Fort Pulaski photo. Thx for sharing..
Go to
Dec 7, 2022 14:45:53   #
Fitz424 wrote:
1st shot A7ii 1/400 f10 16mm
SAL1635 f2.8 with LEA5 adapter
2nd shot A7ii 1/60 f16 24mm
Sel 24105 oss f4


Love, love the black & white and I’m generally not a b&w person.
Go to
Nov 21, 2022 11:18:09   #
imagemeister wrote:
If it is not a "photography trip" and you are not submitting to NatGeo, GET the RX100VII and/or the RX100V for the faster f1.8 lens and you are DONE.


If I thought I would go again someday, I would. But at 72 this might be my only trip there. I don’t to want wonder, after the trip, why didn’t I bring something bigger. I can always pack the tiny Sony and see what I really end up using.

Thx for your time and thoughts. I guess, I will only really know what’s best for me, until I am there.
Go to
Nov 21, 2022 11:12:45   #
zug55 wrote:
I understand all these dilemmas--I too want to keep my kit small while having the lenses I need. I have settled on the Sony 24-105mm f/4 as my main travel lens. I was on sabbatical for seven months earlier this year; I spent half of it in Europe (Ireland, Spain, Portugal, France, Germany, Switzerland) and the other half in Kenya. I had with me two bodies, Sony A7III (similar specs to your A7C) and A7RIII. Lenses: Sony 24-105mm G, Sony 100-400 GM, Zeiss Batis 18mm, Sony Zeiss 35mm f/2.8, Sony Zeiss 55mm.I used the 24-105 for 90% of the shots, the 100-400 for wildlife and for some landscape shots, the 18mm for when I needed wide (lots of church interiors), and the tiny 35mm for street photography, particularly in Nairobi. I never used the 55mm even though it is a great lens.

I could absolutely trust to get a great image with my Sony 24-105mm under just about any circumstance. I have used it for interior shots in churches and urban night shots. I shoot at f/4 and ISO 6400 which usually lets me shoot at 1/30 of a second, depending on available light. The image stabilization in both body and lens work great in tandem, so I get a good shot to about 1/15 of a second, handheld. On all my travels, shooting at f/4 never kept me from getting the shot, even in poor light. I understand that you have reservations about the lens because of the form factor, and I get that.

Clear Image Zoom (CIZ) works great with all lenses, but it also has limitations. It only works in JPEG. The focus system is not as nimble--you only get zone focusing. For landscape or city shots this generally is not a problem. I get very sharp images. In contrast to cropping, you do not lose pixels, so you still get all the details. I would test it before the trip so you know how to use it. I have it programmed to one of my buttons.

Prime lenses: I think that the Sony 20mm would be a good lens for interiors. It is wide enough to capture interior spaces and fast enough to get shots that are in focus even in dark spaces. The Sony/Zeiss 55mm is a superb lens. I do not shoot much at 55mm, but that is a matter of personal preference. (I never used it on my seven-month trip.) The same with 85mm: I have a nice 85mm prime lens that I never use. I personally think that this is not a useful focal lenght for travel. If you want to take a second prime lens I would take a 35mm lens, or perhaps a 28mm--again, this a personal choice. I use the tiny Sony/Zeiss 35mm f/2.8--it weighs only 120g. Sony also makes a good 35mm lens at f/1.8 that is quite small too. Sony also issued three small primes (24/40/50mm) specifically for the A7C. But the limitation with primes is that you invariably end up changing lenses, which is difficult to do when you are part of a group trip. Taking the Sony 28mm f/2 would be an alternative. I think that 28mm is a useful focal length for travel.

I go through all these questions before each trip. And each time I grab the Sony 24-105mm.The IQ is great across the board, it is extremely versatile, and I can make it work in difficult light situations. If I was on your trip, I would take this lens. I also would take the Sony 20mm (or my Batis 18mm). I also would take a small 28mm or 35mm prime--the Sony 28mm f/2 or 35mm f/1.8 being good options.
I understand all these dilemmas--I too want to kee... (show quote)


Thx you are taking the time to really think about and respond to my lens dilemma based upon your experience. On a perfect trip, a photography trip, I would definitely use the Sony 24-105 most of the time. It is my favorite zoom range. I just don’t want to stand out in the religious minded group as the out of place camera geek. So I’d like to be more inconspicuous.

Thx for the note the CIZ is only jpg. The shots I’m thinking of might benefit from my usual RAW. I have the new, small Sony 24mm f/2.8 but wonder if that 20mm f/1.8 might be more useful for all the dark interiors. I don’t want to carry 2 wide angles. I do like 24-28mm views; 35mm not so much. I have the feeling I might pack extra lenses but only carry a couple and see what works for this trip. I’d rather not, but it’s better to have a 28-75 f/2.8 or 24-105 f/4 packed, than left at home. Everyone has given me much to think about. Maybe it’s time to rent a couple pieces to try out. Thx again
Go to
Nov 20, 2022 19:18:57   #
Burkley wrote:
A camera in the holy land is fun. Plenty of opportunities for great shots. A few of the churches seemed particularly dark, so a higher ISO is often needed. I would take the 24-105 and a 20 prime or 16-35. I love a 70-200 when traveling, but for a third lens I would take a fast 50 mm, like 1.8, for Israel. The people there are as colorful as the sites and are often within Mosques, synagogues or cathedrals.


I thought it might be a lot like street photography, so a wider (20mm 1.8 or 16-35 PZ) and normal faster (55mm 1.8) might be useful. Just debating what to do for something longer. Really don’t want to lug abound the Sony 24-105mm on this non-photography trip; plus it’s f/4. Maybe the Sony RX100 vii for its 200mm plus Clear Image Zoom, in a real pinch? Thx so much for your thoughts. Wish they had a smaller 24-105mm like Canon.
Go to
Nov 20, 2022 19:05:00   #
zug55 wrote:
The dilemma is that there aren't any small zooms to match the form factor of the A7C, with the exception of the 28-60mm kit lens. So you will have to compromise somewhere. The Sony 24-105mm at 663g is a little larger and heavier. I would stay away from the 24-240mm because it is too heavy, the IQ isn't as good, and you don't really need 240mm on a trip like this. You could use the Sony PZ 16-35mm f/4 as your primary lens and use the 28-60 as a back-up for when you need a longer lens. These may not be the fastest lenses, but shooting at f/4 at night or in dark interiors is workable. You also can extend the reach of your lenses by using Clear Image Zoom.
The dilemma is that there aren't any small zooms t... (show quote)


I wondered about Clear Image Zoom. I’ve never used it and haven’t had the A7c long. I usually shoot with a Canon R5, but didn’t want to try the smaller sensor R7. I am tempted to take the Sony 20mm 1.8; Sony 55 1.8 and Sony 85mm 1.8. I am really concerned about dim/dark interiors, so I hesitate on the Sony PZ 16-35mm, tho the size and weight are nice. I’m also concerned by the short reach of the Sony 28-60mm; but I will check it out. Thx so much for all the interesting options for traveling smaller and lighter.
Go to
Nov 20, 2022 15:03:51   #
Basil_O wrote:
I shot a trip there in 2008 with a Sony A100 and 18-70 kit lens. ISO 400 was my max. Don't worry about low light. I would, however, want something wide for interior shots. Pay attention to the little details like oil lamps and candle sticks. Each location is specific to what the church is commemorating.

But I would encourage you to also spend some time in each spot just looking around and being present in the space. It can touch you in deep and profound ways if you let it. It's not your normal tourist junket unless that is all you want it to be.
I shot a trip there in 2008 with a Sony A100 and 1... (show quote)


“Little details” will hopefully remind me to be “present in the moment”, seeing both the large and small views. Maybe a Sony A7C is too big to take and will detract from the experience. Can always take it; don’t have to use it. Maybe something smaller is an good choice. Wish full frame digital cameras were the size of my old Pentax ME w/ fast 50mm f/1.2. We took that all over the Ireland and the United Kingdom in 1978. Perfect size with interchangeable lenses.
Go to
Nov 20, 2022 10:34:45   #
Ltgk20 wrote:
I did a lot of research for the same trip a couple of years ago (unfortunately cancelled due to COVID-19) and what I settled on is this:. The 24-105 for nearly everything and something oh the 18-20mm f1.4 to F1.8 range for indoors shots on low light and tight spaces. My understanding is that many if the indoor sights are small and tight and dark, thus the fast, wide prime.


I wondered about the indoor sites too and thought a faster lens would probably be better there; but there is the lure of a small zoom, though slower, that could double for tight street shots. I’m basically a landscape photographer so shooting tight, low light interiors with a newer, mirrorless sensor, full frame, is not something I’ve done recently. Is a f/4 zoom fast enough. I’m thinking of the Bethlehem “cave” (stable, manger)? Just thinking that’s going to be really dark. Thx for your thoughts.
Go to
Nov 20, 2022 10:23:28   #
Basil_O wrote:
I would like to suggest taking as small of a kit as possible and only pulling it out when you want to take a shot. Otherwise, keep it put away and focus on the trip. There is so much to absorb on the sensory and spiritual levels that a camera can be a distraction.


Yes; that’s why I want to travel small, light and inconspicuous. It’s not a photography trip.
Go to
Nov 20, 2022 10:20:44   #
zug55 wrote:
There is no "Israel lens." Your trip probably will include the standard travel shots: urban shots, ranging from the narrow streets of Jerusalem to the modern Tel Aviv, landscapes, dark interiors.

Since you will not have much time to change lenses, I would choose a lens that gives you the utmost flexibility. Specifically, I would pick standard zoom lens that opens to 24mm, not 28mm. Those 4mm make a big difference. I travel extensively, and my favorite travel lens is the superb Sony 24-105mm f/4 G. I have taken about 30,000 shots with it in the past four years, including in dark church interiors in a number of European countries. You can shoot at 6400 ISO, which gives you the option of shooting handheld at f/4 in interior spaces and at night (I do this all the time). The IBIS in the A7C with the stabilization of the lens allow you to shoot at 1/20 of a second. (I think that a tripod or a monopod will not be practical. Furthermore, many religious places do not allow them.)

I also would take a wider lens for interior shots or for tight architectural shots. My choice is the outstanding Zeiss Batis 18mm f/2.8; this lens and the Sony 24-105mm form my basic travel kit pretty much for any kind of trip. A good alternative would be the fine Sony 20mm f/1.8 G. If you are looking for a zoom, I would pick the new Sony PZ 16-35mm f/4 G lens. You might like this one so much that it stays on your camera most of the time in places like Jerusalem. The Tamron 17-28mm would work too, but it has a more limited range.

Good luck and enjoy your trip.

PS: taking a second body, like the Sony RX100 VII, is a great idea.
There is no "Israel lens." Your trip pro... (show quote)


Yes, I would prefer something like the Sony 24-105 but not as long/heavy for the A7c. I would go with the older Sony 24-70 f/4 but am concerned that I might need an extra reach more often. I am debating a wide Tamron/Sigma zoom or the fine Sony20 1.8. I had wondered about the Sony PZ 16-35mm. I’m not sure how much an f/4 would hamper me inside buildings and at nite. I love fast lenses but not their size and weight while on vacation. Unfortunately, there is no perfect lens. Thx again for sharing.
Go to
Nov 20, 2022 09:55:51   #
wireloose wrote:
A lot of my favorite shots from Jerusalem are low light images, in churches, in the market, and golden hour. An rx100 would be fine for the outdoors during the day. 28-70 is a good choice, would add something like the 17-28 Tamron or a fast ~20mm prime. I lugged a tripod but in a tour group you won’t have time for that. A monopod might be helpful-there are a lot of stairs and before my knee replacement I found it a useful support for my body as well as my camera.


I really hope there aren’t a lot of old stairs. I do have one knee that does not like them. I am debating between the Sony 20 f/1.8 and a fast wide zoom. I have used the 20mm and like it but would love to find something smaller and fast, if possible. Thx for the ideas
Go to
Nov 20, 2022 09:51:44   #
imagemeister wrote:
My first choice would be the RX10/100, going larger, look at the Sony 24-240mm, and the 28mm f2 for interiors.
.


Thx for the suggestion. I will check the specs on the lens. The A7c is a small camera, so I’m not eager to pair it with a long (size) lens. I would like to retain some of the camera’s small form factor, if possible. I don’t mind taking a couple (2-3) lens to stay small while walking around.
Go to
Nov 19, 2022 14:46:37   #
I realize these travel questions get asked a lot but I have not seen one for travel to Israel using a small Sony A7c camera. We chose the A7c for its full frame and small size. We have never been to Israel so aren’t sure whether or not to just bring Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 or add wide angle zoom (which one?), and maybe a faster prime for inside and night shots (which one?).

I would appreciate hearing from those who have been to Israel, perhaps on a religious sites tour and/or those with a Sony system camera. We might bring a small pocketable Sony rx100 vii or something else small. We realize that there will not be a lot of time to prepare shots as these tours move at a set pace; but still wanted to bring something with a bigger sensor.
Go to
Oct 30, 2022 17:14:55   #
What’s your asking price? Does that include insured shipping? What forms of payment do accept?
Go to
Oct 30, 2022 17:13:48   #
Alan rust wrote:
Up for sale is the following (everything is in like new condition):

- Canon EOS R6 (with box and original contents, strap, battery charger, battery pack) less than 3k shutter count.

- Canon CarePAK Plus until January 2025 (warranty that covers accidental damage in addition to normal wear and tear).

- Canon LP-E6NH OEM Battery (second battery with original box).

- Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 Lens

- Canon Lens Hood ES-65B (for RF 50mm Lens).

- Canon Mount Adapter EF - EOS R

All this comes to $3,188.31 if purchased new at B&H Photo/Video.

I have a 100% feedback rating across eBay, Facebook, OfferUp, and Amazon that dates back to 2001. I am the first and only owner of these items, and they all were purchased at Authorized Retailers.


Please let me know if you have any questions.

Alanrust00713@gmail.com
Up for sale is the following (everything is in lik... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.