Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: wdross
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 439 next>>
Mar 20, 2024 20:00:01   #
UTMike wrote:
Our old dog walks until he gets tired and then he gets a ride.

Comments and suggestions are welcome.


I am glad he likes to walk as far as he can before wanting to ride. He is going to live a while longer with your help.
Go to
Mar 18, 2024 18:24:32   #
Rongnongno wrote:
The progress is in the sensor, nowhere else.

The idea of using a display instead of through the lens is reverting to old time when folks were looking from above to focus...

Issues with the display...
- LIGHT!!! If too bright, good luck using the display.
- Eyes issue If one needs glasses all bets are off, there is no way to adjust for that but use the tiny in camera display in the 'view finder'. Go check for accuracy on that since the display is made of tiny pixels vs 'a normal light' (analog)
- Weight unbalance. (Light body, heavy lens)

That is one of the few reasons why I will not upgrade to mirrorless, even if I do appreciate the new sensors.
The progress is in the sensor, nowhere else. br b... (show quote)


It is interesting to hear this. Even at 74 years of age and increasing eyeglass problems, I have none of the problems you have mentioned with my mirrorless camera. I can see why you have your point of view, but I wonder why I don't have the same problems.
Go to
Mar 16, 2024 18:28:18   #
jozee wrote:
Thank you so much for the detailed info. That will be very helpful. Since the camera is not mirrorless, would that change anything?


Do not look through the viewfinder without a filter that blocks UV rays! With a filter that allows UV rays, the UV rays will be concentrated and blindness will occur after the totality when the sunburn sets in. During totality, yes, one can view the chromesphere without the filter on the camera. But some people forget to remove their eye from the viewfinder before the end of totality! And some that were not quick enough paid with damaged eyesight. I cannot emphasize enough that sunlight concentrated by a telephoto lens is very, very dangerous. And the camera will be exposed to unfiltered sunlight at the end of totality also. But the camera is much, much more rugged than one's eye and repairable. One's eye that has been damaged as such is more than likely permanent.
Go to
Mar 16, 2024 16:07:37   #
bsprague wrote:
I didn't know either so I asked my computer:

"Copilot...........

Photographing a solar eclipse with a mirrorless camera involves several steps to ensure safety and capture stunning images.

Here’s a concise guide:

Use a Solar Filter: Protect your camera’s sensor and your eyes by attaching a solar filter to your lens. Keep it on until totality.

Camera Settings:
Set your ISO to the lowest value, like ISO 100.
Switch to Manual mode.
Choose a fast shutter speed, such as 1/4000 or 1/8000.

Adjust the aperture to the lens’s sweet spot, usually between f/5.6 and f/81.

Choose the Right Lens: A telephoto lens with a focal length of at least 300mm on a full-frame camera is recommended for detailed shots.

Stabilize Your Camera: Use a tripod to keep your camera steady during the shoot.

Plan Your Shots: Decide if you want to capture the entire event or focus on specific phases.

Practice: Test your setup before the eclipse to ensure you’re ready for the event.

Remember, never look directly at the sun without proper eye protection, and always use a solar filter on your camera lens during the partial phases of the eclipse. For more detailed information, you can refer to comprehensive guides available online.

Happy shooting!"
I didn't know either so I asked my computer: br b... (show quote)


Good advice. It cannot be said enough: Be sure you have the adequate and proper filters for both your eyes (to prevent blindness) and camera (to prevent costly camera damage). For your eyes, make sure what you buy cuts off the UV rays. Some camera filters do not cut off UV rays (sunburned eyes = blindness). So be very careful about using camera filters for your naked eye viewing of the sun. As far as other exposure data, try the NASA eclipse website. And there are lots of other sites to gain more info too. And the suggestion of practicing is important. Three or four minutes goes so fast it is almost unbelievable. And be sure to observe the shadow coming and going. Watch the horizon's color change as the shadow comes. Feel the temperature drop 10° to 15°. If you are near animals or birds, watch their behavior change and their confusion after totality. And during totality, be sure to see the chromesphere and stars without any filters and just your naked eyes (all while shooting of course; remember: practice, practice, practice, practice, practice).
Go to
Mar 13, 2024 18:49:09   #
Bill 45 wrote:
This afternoon I tested my camera for the solar eclipse in April. The camera is a Fujifilm's Finepix S and a KT Industries Welding Plate Shade 10. Put the weld plate in front of the camera lens and the camera would not work. The weld plate cut off ALL light to the camera. I had the camera aim at the sun. Clear afternoon here in Northern New York. I remove the weld plate and the camera was working fine. Have read that some people have said use a weld plate at shade 13 or 14. 13 or 14? Ok, people what should be done?
This afternoon I tested my camera for the solar ec... (show quote)


The welders glass should be an ND 17, ND 18, and ND 19. You can safely use the welders glass to view the sun through it. I have never heard of welders plate. I do know if you cannot see the sun through the welders glass, the glass you have is too protective and blocking. One should be able to view the sun through the welders glass as long as they want if it is the right darkness. And if it is the right darkness for one's eyes, it is the right darkness for one's camera.
Go to
Mar 11, 2024 21:32:55   #
PipeTobacco wrote:
Hello Everyone:

As I really have not been focused (hah, unintended pun) on new "point & shoot" cameras of late, as I tend to only use my old DSLR for my photography, I have a question I would like to hear opinions on:

I have a daughter who is going on an extended overseas trip to two different continents (South America and Asia), and I am hoping to get her a camera for that trip. A few caveats:

1. She is not a photographer by inclination.
2. She does take some occasional photos with her iPhone.
3. She needs to travel "light" so a basic, rectangular "point & shoot" would be her best bet to fit easily into a pocket to carry with her through her travels.

I would like her camera to be reasonably "durable" so that is she accidentally drops it, it may likely survive.
I would like it to be as functional as possible in low light situations.
I would like it to be reasonably fast to record images to whatever media it uses.

I tend to likely prefer Nikon, Canon, Panasonic, or Sony, but am open to other options.

I would like to spend somewhere in the $100 - $300 range.

What would you think would be good choices to look into?

Thank you for considering my request for guidance!

Pipe
Hello Everyone: br br As I really have not been f... (show quote)


They are relatively hard to find, but if I were you, I would try to find a used TG-5 (Olympus label), TG-6 (Olympus label), and TG-7 (OM System label). Waterproof, 7' drop proof, available ring flash accessory, 11X macro ability, sequence shooting, RAW and JPEG, etc. B&H Photo used, Adorama used, Ken Camera, and OMDS's reconditioned would be good areas to search. Just a reminder, the new TG-7 is on sale for $499.99 (normally $549.99). It is worth considering even if it becomes yours when she gets home.
Go to
Mar 10, 2024 17:48:48   #
capmike wrote:
Hello all. My wife and I are taking a 2 week trip to the Falklands in November. We will be staying for at least 4 days in remote cabins with no A/C. How to charge cameras and devices? Why a power bank was made just for this purpose, right? I’ve spent the better part of the last 2 weeks researching these devices. There are a lot to choose from, and when I think I’ve found just the item, I read the negative reviews. Don’t last, customer service non existent, not actually delivering the promised watts, and on and on.

Then I thought, wouldn’t it be nice if the battery we had in our camera could be used to power another device. I have lots of camera batteries, but alas, Nikon apparently didn’t think of that.

Would appreciate any first hand experience any of you may have with this conundrum.

Thanks,

CM
Hello all. My wife and I are taking a 2 week trip ... (show quote)


Take a solar charger. There are any number of them with different outputs. Just a suggestion.
Go to
Mar 10, 2024 17:41:55   #
Pappio wrote:
Any advice on photographing the solar eclipse? I have a Nikon D3200 camera.


You will need proper a filter to prevent camera damage and eye blindness. The only time that a filter will not be needed would be during the time of totality. If you are not on the path of totality, you will need a filter 100% of the time. The best places for information are the NASA eclipse website and Thousand Oaks Optical website. And remember, if the filter does not have the right spec cited for UV cutoff, the UV coming through the filter will be able to blind someone. One other filter source is welders glass. It will cut both intense sunlight and UV rays the same way it does for welding. ND 17, ND 18, or ND19 in welders glass should be sufficient. Of course, it is not as optically flat as a proper lens filter, but I have found it to be more than flat enough for solar photography. Have fun with this one since I am going to miss it because of my granddaughter's wedding.
Go to
Mar 10, 2024 11:40:57   #
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
I have the TG 6. Use it kayaking and boating



Ideally made for wet environments!
Go to
Mar 10, 2024 11:38:45   #
RetCapt wrote:
I'll second your vote on the TG series. I consider these water/shock/compression proof cameras to be a photographic necessity because I am so often in environments adverse to conventional cameras.

This one was taken with a distant predecessor to the TG series, an Olympus 1030SW, which was my first ever digital camera. I still have it, and it works just fine. I have two other more recent such cameras, but I chose this image to show what this 10mp camera can do. While this was a very calm day (as shown by the surf), I was still standing in sand, and of course this was in salt air. Peace of mind while taking photographs is of great value to me. I want to be able to enjoy the experience of being there and getting the photograph, not just the end product, which is the print I make.

While able to be carried in a pocket, that is not how I carry mine, but that is an individual decision.
I'll second your vote on the TG series. I consid... (show quote)


Go to
Mar 9, 2024 12:52:33   #
bobforman wrote:
There hasn't been much discussion lately about true pocket cameras. (Ones you can actually slip into a front pocket or cargo pants side pocket.) I know cell phones have encroached in this domain, but I curious if hoggers have a preference as to currently offered models and which one is the best.


On my "wish list" is the TG-6 or TG-7. Waterproof, 7' drop proof, 11X macro, ring flash attachment, etc. And will easily fit in one's pocket. Not as sophisticated as larger cameras but offers more than a smartphone as far as I am concerned.
Go to
Mar 6, 2024 18:48:44   #
Mainridge wrote:
As a wildlife shooter, one is always instructed to fill the frame. When the distance is such that the frame cannot be filled using a full-frame camera, is there a hard and fast rule as to the best alternative method to fill the frame? In other words, should I switch over to Aps-c, add a teleconverter or crop in post. I am usually shooting with a 45 mp camera if that helps.


As Linda From Maine, Longshadow, CHG_CANON, and some others have stated, "fill the frame" is a relative term. I always fill the frame, but as Linda has pointed out, it is the photographic composition that must fill the frame. As Jimmy T points out, for a full-frame or APS-C image most will be a "non-standard" print unless one crops for 5X7, 8X10, 11X14, etc. And if shooting for a "standard" size print, one cannot necessarily shoot to "fill the frame". As CHG_CANON pointed out though, 45mp should allow one to crop very heavily while retaining image quality easily up to and including 20X24. If you are still having trouble obtaining the image size for your composition, then a good teleconverter would be your best option in my opinion. Since I shoot 4/3rds and have less megapixels, it becomes more important that I shoot the best I can to fill the frame so my cropping is minimal. Also, my sensor shape requires less cropping for most standard print sizes than full-frame or APS-C. But at 45mp and additional room for your composition than my sensor, you should not have any worries about filling the frame unless you are printing 30X40 or larger.
Go to
Mar 3, 2024 20:59:02   #
JimBart wrote:
Currently I possess a Nikon 7100 with Nikon lens of 18-140 and 55-300 plus a Sigma 150-300 and enjoy it. I shoot mainly wildlife and landscapes
I am however ThINKING of purchasing a OM 1 or a Mark ll but it seems like no one can tell me the difference between the 2 systems. I like the clarity/sharpness of the OM system and know I’ll need a new lens but nothing more. Is it worth a change?
HELP!!


First, no desperation. You already have a good system. You can take your time. You can spend time at the camera store and maybe even rent to see how various cameras and lenses fit your needs.

Second, the main differences between 4/3rds and full frame and APS-C is size, weight, cost, depth of field, ISO, and occasionally megapixels (20mp and 25mp is max for 4/3rds at this time). Size and weight of the camera bodies tend to be similar for just about any format. But the size, weight, and cost of the 4/3rds lenses tend to be less, especially for the larger telephoto lenses. Because of the sensor size difference, the smaller 4/3rds sensor results in a relatively larger depth of field than full frame or APS-C for the same aperture. If you do a lot of heavy cropping, that is when the higher megapixel sensors (30+) are a savior. Because of the shape of the 4/3rds sensor, most standard print formats require less image (megapixels) loss than full frame or APS-C. And ISO tends to be noisier at higher ISOs as the sensor gets smaller. ISOs less than 3200 tends to be more than acceptable in 4/3rds.These are the very basic differences in the formats. And as far as image quality goes, there are a lot of UHHers that love the image quality of their Sony RX10s and RX100s which has an even smaller sensor than 4/3rds. Image quality is really one of least important concerns between all formats at this digital point in time.

Third, many UHHers have both a full frame camera and a 4/3rds camera. And there are photographers
on even other photo sites that have both a full frame and a 4/3rds camera. Some photographers have even given up their full frame cameras after spending time with their 4/3rds camera. And as a travel camera, especially international travel, 4/3rds is one of the favorites because of the 4/3rds size and weight.

And fourth and last, all 4/3rds is interchangeable for all basic functions. An OM body or Panasonic body can use an OM lens or Panasonic lens. This allows for a lot more choices in bodies and lens. OM specializes in still shooting with good video. Panasonic now shoots very good stills and specializes in some of the very best camera video.

How have fun taking a look at 4/3rds. And if you want less shoulder weight when walking around, definitely consider buying something like an OM-1 mkII with a 12-40 or 12-100 lens.
Go to
Mar 3, 2024 18:25:18   #
Peteso wrote:
My Oly E-M1X displays a symbol that I can't identify in the camera's user manual (600+ pages). The documentation I have even have separate "symbols" sections, but this symbol is not included. The symbol in question is in the attached screen shots (circled in red). Do any of you know what this symbol represents? I don't think it is an error or warning message, because those are usually displayed as orange triangles, so I suspect this symbol is provided for informational purposes...but I'm actually not sure. Thank you in advance for your assistance.
My Oly E-M1X displays a symbol that I can't identi... (show quote)


The satellite will give you all the GPS you want for your photographs - if you want or need that GPS. It is at least an option available to you that a lot of other photographers do not have an option to.
Go to
Feb 29, 2024 12:27:53   #
tjmoore wrote:
What kind of fliter do I need?


Go to the NASA eclipse web site and the Thousand Oaks web site. These sites will educate you. Thousand Oaks Optical will sell you film that can stop both intense sunlight and UV rays. If you are not using a DSLR and only a mirrorless, they can sell you film that cuts the intense sunlight. Do not make the mistake of getting the wrong type filter for your camera. Blindness is a possibility if you use a DSLR with the wrong filter. UV "sunburned" eyes rarely see again. Both B&H Photo and Adorama will sell you filters too. Most will not stop UV rays unless the paperwork with the filters cite the correct spec for UV cutoff. Welders glass will also work because it will cut both the intense light and UV of welding. ND18 or ND19 welders glass will do fine. You should be able to use a piece to watch the sun if you do not buy Thousand Oaks sun shades.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 439 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.