Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: skingfong
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 25 next>>
Oct 4, 2017 13:13:28   #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Same with the OIS on my Fuji. It's so good that I can comfortably leave my tripod at home on a planned trip to France. I've done a few at 1/2 second with acceptable results.


1/2 second shutter speed? You just sold me!
Go to
Oct 4, 2017 13:01:31   #
camerapapi wrote:
I cannot speak on behalf of others but my opinion is that IS is much more useful in teles than it is with wide angles.


I had the same thought. Usually when I use a 20mm lens I can get down to 1/30 comfortably. Occasionally in low light, hand holding IS or VR would be handy but how much better would it be? 2 or 3 stops? I love the IS on my other lenses though.
Go to
Oct 4, 2017 02:18:29   #
Is it useful or marketing hype? If the shutter speed should be at least equivalent to the focal length, doesn't it mean you can get by on slow shutter speeds anyway? What do you think?
Go to
Oct 2, 2017 22:20:52   #
Yes. I like the extra battery capacity, balance for heavier lenses and not having to turn your wrist for portrait orientation.
Go to
Sep 29, 2017 17:42:05   #
Feiertag wrote:
When I first got into photography, five years ago, I was told that you can be the best photographer by following these two tips. The first one was, "Read your camera manual!" The second tip, "Read your manual, again!" How many people have you meet that didn't bother turning a page? I have come across many people that haven't.

Plus, I was also told that a bad shot is better than no shot. In the past, I hesitated and lost the shot because I was trying to get things just right.

What are some of the simple tips, that you have been given to others or received?

Cheers!
When I first got into photography, five years ago,... (show quote)


You cant fix out of focus in post.
Out of focus shots get deleted and aren't useable.
Dynamic Range, contrast, color, burst rate, image quality, etc. are all meaningless when a shot is out of focus.
Bottom line: Make sure you're in focus with adequate shutter speed.

This is what I learned from my best teacher, "experience".
Go to
Sep 26, 2017 14:11:15   #
Manual mode with auto ISO is essentially having aperture and shutter priority at the same time. I like the concept. The ISO setting should be monitored so it doesn't get too high.
Go to
Sep 18, 2017 17:43:22   #
Feiertag wrote:
Here is mine. While vacationing last year, in Mahone Bay, Nova Scotia, I was taking shots from the Government Wharf. The passenger in a beat up pickup truck leaned out his window and yells, "Hey buddy, how many watts is your lens?" With a straight face, I told him it was a Nikon 200-400 watts. B^)

Do have a story to share?


I was up in the mountains shooting the Milky Way and Perseid Meteor showers. A young lady probably in her early 20's approached me asking if I could Instagram her the pictures I took. I laughed and told her I don't do Instagram. Instead, I got her email address and sent her a link when I posted a couple of shots on Flickr. My friend who was with me thought is was funny thinking "old guys like us on Instagram?" I guess I need to get with the times. It took me long enough to give into texting. I do Facebook occasionally, but refuse to put that app on my phone.
Go to
Sep 16, 2017 14:47:34   #
burkphoto wrote:
It is ENTIRELY possible to make your RGB monitor and CMYK printer match very, very closely. But for the whole ICC color management SYSTEM to work, you must start with a calibrated AND ICC PROFILED monitor. Wrap your brain around this:

Calibration only LINEARIZES a device. That means, for a given input level, the device produces the same output level.

ICC Profiling DESCRIBES a device's true capability — the boundaries of its color reproduction potential or COLOR GAMUT. It is the profile that matches color to the international standard, then to the printer/ink/paper profile used when you print. The printer driver chooses a stock profile for each paper type, or you can download printer/paper/ink profiles from paper manufacturers if you use third party materials.

Unless your monitor is properly calibrated and CUSTOM profiled, using a colorimeter or spectrophotometer and software, you're wasting time, money, paper, ink, and printer life!

Today, calibration and profiling are easy, painless, simple, quick, and relatively inexpensive. If you print much, you will save enough on lab bills, ink, paper, and labor to pay for the kit.

Get a DataColor Spyder5Pro Plus or an X-RITE Color Munki or an X-Rite i1Display Pro. Install the software, plug in the device, and follow instructions TO THE LETTER.

Keep the monitor brightness between 90 and 120 cd/m^2 (candelas per square meter), as measured by your calibration device.

Be sure you are viewing prints at roughly the same brightness, under 5000K, 91+ CRI fluorescent lighting.

I know $100 to $300 for a calibration/profiling kit seems like a lot, but you can burn through that much paper and ink in a hurry, without one.

I use an iMac, a DataColor Spyder5Pro, and several labs and printers. My office printer is an Epson WF-3640. My prints on photo paper match my monitor very closely.

CMYK and RGB are VERY different color models, with one being additive (RGB add up to white) and the other subtractive (CMYK subtract colors from white light bouncing off of paper). So it is a wonder a monitor and paper can be made to look ANYTHING like each other. But they can, and do, with proper calibration and profiling.
It is ENTIRELY possible to make your RGB monitor a... (show quote)


Glad you mentioned ICC profile. That also crossed my mind as I was reading this thread.
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 14:49:09   #
Grampy Jack wrote:
A friend of mine shoots with a Nikon D610 and a D750 and has noticed a problem with the focus when she uses auto ISO. The ISO is only in the 200 to 640 range so there should not be a noise problem and she would recognize noise. Taking the same shot manually setting ISO does not seem to have a focu problem. I realize I do not know all of the particulars so my question is simply, "Has anyone noticed a focus problem when using auto ISO?"


I'm surprised no one mentioned Auto ISO can also affect the aperture in shutter priority mode. If the aperture is opened all the way because of low light, that can create very shallow DOF depending on the lens. That could also make the picture look out of focus.
Go to
Sep 5, 2017 22:14:15   #
papa wrote:
Depending on what camera he's shooting now, it may be time to upgrade the body, but as the glass is the most limiting factor for the best IQ, I would agree;
buy a Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC and see the difference immediately. He can upgrade the body next and that will be manifest, too. I don't suffer from GAS; I have benefited many times from it. In just the last five years I have stepped up from a Canon T1i with two kit lenses, 50D, 7D, 5D Mark II, and now 5D Mark III. My kit now the 5D Mark III, 7D, Tamrons 24-70 VC, 70-200 VC, 150-600 VC and Tokina 16-28; all excellent 2.8 glass. All other gear I've sold and broke even on as I shopped all used at great deals. You see I let the too rich gotta have the newest best gear guys GAS attack be my harbinger to upgrade, because with the new Canon high end bodies added the last few years there's a flood of 5D Mark IIIs. I bought one in mint condition two years ago with 2,000 clicks for $1,860, when Canon's retail was still at $2,799. This camera is hard to beat. Everything in my kit at present I purchased brand new or mint condition and averaged out it cost me 60% of retail. I must make every dollar count, because as my Pappy used to say to me, "Boy, you've got a champagne taste and a beer income". It's quite inspiring to have such high quality gear. It's motivating to shoot even more with the image quality they produce. So, now I wonder is will it enhance his photography or is he a too rich gotta have the newest best gear guys having a GAS attack? Or as his friend are you giving him encouragement or are you being competitive and envious? No answer needed; just a meditation.
Depending on what camera he's shooting now, it may... (show quote)


He has a 5D Mk III, 6D, D77 T7i and more. The 5D Mk III is no slouch as you well know. He had B&H points or bucks to use so I suggested fast glass. I also kept in mind his level of shooting as he only uses the P Mode. As a friend, I'd rather teach him how to shoot and get more familiar Aperture, Shutter, Manual modes and eventually Bulb mode. There's no competition between us. I truly believe he has more than what he needs at his skill level. I want him to spend his money wisely.
Go to
Sep 5, 2017 19:21:22   #
SharpShooter wrote:
I think I hear that here on the Hog at least once per day, if not a lot more often, and in some posts, A LOT!!!
Technically, with ANY machine, that would be true. Even a lowly shovel cannot dig it's own hole!
And I'll be the first to agree that the true art produced by any camera is dependent on the skill of the operator.
But personally I have NEVER traded up to another camera until the shortcomings of my current equipment were not becoming blatantly apparent!
But plain and simple, different types of photography needs different types/levels of cameras.
Sure a new photographer is happy if their camera just takes a sharp image of a landscape.
But what about if you're shooting with a backlit subject using a dedicated spot focus point in the upper left hand corner with changing light and your exposure just won't be correct if the metering system is not linked to that focus point, and you're shooting fast and furious action??? Sorry folks, but a cell phone won't cut it in that situation no matter HOW good the monkey is!!
So do you really believe that the 12 inches behind the camera is all that's needed, the heck with the camera?
Landscape, sports, BIF's, is it all the same?
Are you the one that gives that advice? If so, I'd like to hear your opinion? And WHAT do YOU shoot and with WHAT that has led you to give that advice???
No blame here, just a friendly philosophical discussion! LoL
SS
I think I hear that here on the Hog at least once ... (show quote)


I think it starts with the 12" behind the camera. Everyones skill set and knowledge is different. The more knowledge and skill one has, the more demanding a shooter becomes with their tools. In this case, cameras and or lenses. A knowledgeable shooter will want things like:

a better focusing system that has accuracy and speed. Wide coverage of focus points for those who don't like to focus and recompose. Good Auto focus tracking for moving objects.
Low light performance
FPS is nice for sports and wildlife.
Maximum shutter speed of of 1/8000 vs 1/4000 for narrow DOF in bright light situations.
Faster Shutter speeds or HSS when using flash.
Custom controls
Custom settings
Dual memory card slots, especially if you're on a gig.
Auto bracketing


The list of requirements gets bigger as your knowledge grows. Each individual will have a different list according to what they know.

As far as lenses go, it's mainly going to be fast focusing, sharpness, wide aperture, color, contrast, distortion, aberration, how quiet it is and sometimes IS or VR.

A cell phone or P&S won't cut it and will limit a skillful shooter. As your skills and knowledge grow, so does the demand on your equipment. A skilled photographer will want to be able to handle a lot of different situations that a lesser camera won't be able to handle.

I started with a 40D which was great when I first bought it. Then I found out it didn't have good low light performance. I went to a FF in a 6D knowing I was going to shoot landscapes most of the time. The focus system wasn't the best but adequate for landscape shooting. I started shooting musical performances and learned I didn't like focusing and recomposing with a wide open aperture.
That's when I learned and wished I had more focus points with wider coverage. I also learned I needed better focus tracking for moving objects. My list of demands grew which led me into buying a 7D MkII. Now I have a much better chance of getting good shots of moving objects, wider coverage of AF points, different AF tracking modes, faster FPS and the appearance of more reach using long lenses. Having the 7DII made me realize the focus system is most important to me. If a shot is out of focus, nothing else will matter. All of the other camera features become irrelevant when a shot is out of focus. The 7D MkII wasn't an upgrade but a supplement to the 6D. I think I'm set for what I want to do with the cameras I have for awhile. That could and will probably change down the road.

I've always been a techie and appreciated new technology. It makes life easier for me. But that doesn't mean everyone else is a techie. What works for me may not work for another person and vice versa. The advice to give a person is going to vary depending on what they like to shoot, their skill, knowledge and budget.
Go to
Sep 5, 2017 03:57:02   #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Houses, cars, tools, cameras, whatever; if one can responsibly afford something better and newer---then buy it and enjoy life.
My first digital camera was a Nikon 8700; a piece of crap next to what is available now--and I still have much to learn about digital photography.


I can't argue with that as I've spent 5 figures on a guitar 20 years ago. I still enjoy it just as much today as I did when I first bought it. It's the best purchase I ever made. It has doubled in value but I bought it to play, not to sell. A few years later I had a custom 7 string built for me. Pick your pleasure. The guitar is my pleasure as well as my cameras, 7D MkII and 6D. I also get paid to play guitar and occasionally take pictures. I'm very lucky to get paid for things I love doing.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Sep 4, 2017 20:32:57   #
PixelStan77 wrote:
Good man Stan. Teach him about GAS ..Gear Acquisition Syndrome...something we can do without.


Knowledge and skill are more important to me. They're priceless. At the same time, when you have more skill and knowledge, your demand for better tools goes up. Everyone has a certain level of skill and knowledge. What works for one person may not work for another.
Go to
Sep 4, 2017 20:00:42   #
SharpShooter wrote:
Stan, what a disservice you paid your friend!
Photography is NOT like buying an overpriced car you'll never need, it's much more than that.
In photography, we will ALL only get one chance to take that shot of a lifetime!!
Photography is not like a flood. The hundred year flood comes every year now, but our shot of a lifetime is ONLY gonna happen once!
Hence, we need to have the BEST GEAR that money can buy, or that at least we can justify.
THE LAST thing you want to happen is to have that once in a lifetime shot present itself...., and we MISSED it because our camera could not focus fast enough, or we just finished another boring snapshot and the lag-time was too long to get the next shot off in time or camera start-up took 2 seconds!!!
You get the idea?!
One should be overprepared rather than underprepared for the shot of a lifetime!
Maybe you were never a Boy Scout!! LoL
Now call your friend and apologize while he'll still let you and advise him to order that 1Dxmkll before we stop trading with China, or he may never get that shot of a lifetime!!!
SS
Stan, what a disservice you paid your friend! br P... (show quote)


I should've mentioned he doesn't shoot in Aperture, Shutter or manual mode. He only shoots in P mode. The latest and greatest is fine if you know how to use it. He's not ready for a 1DX markII. He already has a 5D MarkIII, 6D, T7i 77D, T3, and 5D MarkII. All with very low shutter counts. He asked me about getting the 6D MII and the 5DMK IV. He needs to do more shooting and figure out how to use what he has and what he needs before upgrading. Yeah, it's better to have more camera than not enough but in his case, he already has that. I think he's better off investing in glass.

He went to Oregon with the 5D MKIII, 77D, and T7i without getting any useable shots of the Eclipse. Even if he had a 1DX MKII, I think he still wouldn't have gotten the shots. He told me his wife got the best shots between the two of them with her point and shoot. I could feel his frustration. It was a once in a lifetime situation where no camera would have helped him. I told I would go out with him and give him some one on one guidance to get a better handle on his gear.
Go to
Sep 4, 2017 15:05:07   #
tradio wrote:
Well, you're no fun. Bringing logic and sensibility to the table, how dare you!

Lol!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 25 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.