Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Nightsky
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 17 next>>
Sep 18, 2014 18:55:54   #
Russ, Thank you for your time and comments. Ambient light was most certainly bleeding into the frame. I'm limited to where and when I can shoot - hoping for an overcast day. I'll try stopping down and going to one light, and changing the head tilt. The expression is something I struggle with, as I cannot see what I look like.
Thanks again for the time you put into this critique.

Bill
Go to
Sep 18, 2014 12:15:55   #
Here is a reshoot with a neutral background.
D800 Nikon with 85mm prime. Shot in front of grey seamless paper I pre focused on a mannequin, then aligned myself on the same plane for the shot. I'm a bit on the heavy side so I chose short light and shot slightly high - lean in - look up - stretch that double chin out...
1/200 sec f/5.6 ISO 100

Lighting: Main light - 45 degrees camera left a PC Buff Einstein with a 22" beauty dish metered at f/5.0 approximately 3 feet from the subject. Fill Light - PC Buff Einstein with a 5' octobox just slightly camera right (just far enough to shoot past it) metered at f/2.2. Background light was a Neewer C180 snooted and metered at f/2.0 placed roughly next to the main.

There was a fair amount of ambient light in the room as well.

C & C welcome


(Download)
Go to
Sep 17, 2014 20:54:46   #
Love it - I would guess this one will be treasured.
Go to
Sep 17, 2014 13:53:09   #
alissaspieces wrote:
And this is why I post in this forum...makes me think about aspects of photography that I didn't even know to think about...so much learning! :)


So true. So much to learn - So many things to think about before the shutter is pressed - then the post... It seems almost overwhelming at first but if we then look back at our progress through practice and critique we move forward. Without the critiquing process we learn nothing.
Go to
Sep 17, 2014 09:13:14   #
The catchlight in here eyes says natural light but the nose shadow is near perfect and there is a fairly hard shadow cast by the apron on her sleeve. I may have added a little more fill light to soften up the shadows but that's an artistic choice.

Was this all natural or strobe supplemented?.
Go to
Sep 16, 2014 08:29:43   #
Unique Photo in Fairfield NJ has free shipping on big ticket items. As far as I know they do not have a store in NY so there should not be any tax either. Their prices are in line with Adorama and B&H.

http://www.uniquephoto.com/
Go to
Sep 16, 2014 08:23:12   #
Don't know about CC - but in CS-6 you can use File . Revert to undo all your changes and restore your original. You should also be able to do this through your 'History' box - pick a point in the current session to go back to. I'm not sure if this function has a limit on how many actions it will store.
Go to
Sep 14, 2014 10:42:23   #
Photoman74 wrote:
On the liter side.
The hair light has blown out the details.
:) :) :)


lol - Don't miss it one bit :thumbup:
Go to
Sep 14, 2014 09:58:19   #
Thanks Jon - appreciate your input. It's tough to critically evaluate your pose and deportment in a 'selfie', but now knowing what to look for I'll be conscious of it.
Go to
Sep 14, 2014 09:18:53   #
PalePictures wrote:
I had you in mind for this shot. Cliff gave some really good advice on your thread for your photo. Rather than me just chiming in with a ditto to him, I thought this might give you a visual alternative to what you did.
Neutral tones that don't compete with your subject can make a big difference in your final image. Simple light can work really well when we keep the other things in check.


That really stands out for me now. The neutral background works really well, and I can see what you mean by competing tones. Thank You!
Go to
Sep 14, 2014 09:14:41   #
bettis1 wrote:
The zygomatic arch is simply the name of an anatomic structure on a mammalian skull. It is not descriptive beyond that. If it is high, prominent, inconspicuous, etc. or has some characteristic that you want to point out, the descriptive adjective has to be added for your audience to know what you mean.

Bob

A term that I think is way overused in photography is "Pop"! What the hell is that???

B.



I would say that a photo has 'Pop' when your eye is instantly drawn to the subject even with just a casual glance.
Go to
Sep 14, 2014 09:04:43   #
The lighting looks great. Without your description you would never know that speedlights were used rather than studio strobes. I agree with Jon on the hand.
Go to
Sep 14, 2014 08:45:26   #
PalePictures wrote:
...

Probably more than you wanted to know. It's early and I just felt like typing I guess.

Regards,
Russ



Thanks Russ! I enjoyed every word. This post is a great learning tool, especially with the included pictures of the setup.

Bill
Go to
Sep 13, 2014 18:47:51   #
CaptainC wrote:
Pretty good - here is what I would do to improve it:
The camera looks too low. For headshots, you want o the AT LEAST eye level, but just above the top to the head seems to work really well. The will raise his chin and tighten the skin - it also eliminates this look he has of looking down at you (or looking at yourself!).

I would shoot higher and actually lean IN toward me a bit.

Now thesis just a taste thing - I would dial down the fill a bit. You have short lit, but a darker shadow side will give the impression of a thinner face and would fit a man like this perfectly.

Now other may disagree, but for this type of image, a red background is not the kindest thing to do for skin tones.

Oh and I would get the main light up where it belongs to get the nose shadow right and then retouch the reflection on the head.
Pretty good - here is what I would do to improve i... (show quote)


Thank you for the input. I'll try and re-shoot this tomorrow morning incorporating those points.

I'm lousy matching colors to skin tones - any suggestions? There's always black of course, and I have white paper and a sand colored roll. If you think it should be something different please don't be constrained by what I presently have - Paper is cheap.
Go to
Sep 13, 2014 11:54:57   #
This was the best overall portrait of perhaps 40 shots that were taken in this session.

Lighting - Two P. C. Buff Einstein monolights. 22" Beauty dish 45 degrees camera left about 3 feet from the subject as the main light, and a 5' octobox just slightly camera right about 4 feet away for fill. Main metered at f/4, fill at f/1.8. The Main light is placed a bit lower than conventional but with it higher I had too much reflection off the top of the head and too much shadow from the brow cast on the top portion of the eyes. The lights were triggered with one PC cord to the fill and the main was fired by flash sensor. The camera was triggered by Pocket Wizards.

The backdrop (Savage Seamless Crimson 53 inch) was 4 feet behind me. I would have liked more distance to make it darker but the constraints of the room were against it.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 17 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.